Simulation of Natural Frequencies of Orange Fruit Using Finite Element Method

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• V. Kahrizi ¹
• E. Ahmadi ¹
• A. R. Shoshtari ²

¹ Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

² Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2023.80039.1137

Abstract

Introduction
The growing consumer demand for high-quality products has led to the development of new technologies for assessing the quality of agricultural products. Iran is the 9th largest orange producer in the world. Every year, large quantities of agricultural products lose their optimal quality due to mechanical and physical damage during various operations such as harvesting, packaging, transportation, sorting, processing, and storage. This study is performed to identify the natural frequencies and vibration modes of the Thomson orange fruit using finite element modal analysis by ANSYS software. In addition, physical properties including mass, volume, density, and principal dimensions were measured, and mechanical properties were determined using Instron Texture Profile Analysis. The dynamic behavior of the orange fruit was simulated using the pendulum impact test. Afterward, the obtained impact was applied to the orange fruit by force gauge and three-axis accelerometer sensors in both polar and equatorial directions. The three-dimensional geometric model of the orange fruit was drawn in the ANSYS software. After meshing and applying the boundary conditions, the first 20 modes and corresponding natural frequencies were obtained. Since the objective of this study was to identify the natural frequencies of the orange fruit, it was considered to have free movement and rotation in space. The results showed that the natural frequencies of orange fruit are in the range of 0 to 248.41 Hz. Knowledge of the texture characteristics and dynamic behavior of horticultural products is essential for the design and development of agricultural machinery. Furthermore, the design and development of agricultural machinery are directly related to the biological properties of agricultural products.
Materials and Methods
The Thomson orange variety was used in the present study. The oranges used for the experiments were harvested from the Citrus and Subtropical Fruits Research Institute in Ramsar, Iran, located at coordinates 50° 40′ E and 36° 52′ N. The oranges were subsequently divided into two groups: large (average diameter 82 mm) and small (average diameter 66 mm). Conducting the finite element analysis requires knowledge of the physical and mechanical properties of the flesh and skin of the orange fruit. The physical and mechanical properties of the tested samples include geometric dimensions, modulus of elasticity, Poisson’s ratio, and density. In the present study, the dynamic behavior of the orange fruit under dynamic loads was investigated by performing an impact test using a pendulum. The orange fruit was hung from the ceiling using a thin thread to perform experimental tests and extract the modal parameters. The orange samples were subjected to impact at three angles: 7° (below the yield point), 10° (at the dynamic yield point), and 20° (above the dynamic yield point).
Results and Discussion
The comparison of the experimental (laboratory) natural frequencies and simulation validates the simulation results. The experimental natural frequencies of the first, second, and third modes in the large-group oranges are 125.4, 146.9, and 180.4 Hz, respectively. Additionally, the simulation (modal) frequencies are 133.80, 146.16, and 196.66 Hz for the first three modes, respectively. The lowest and the highest differences were observed in the second (0.5%) and third (9.01%) modes, respectively. In the small-group oranges, the first, second, and third modes have experimental natural frequencies of 152.2, 188.8, and 242.2 Hz, respectively, and simulation frequencies are 167.79, 187.50, and 248.30 Hz. The second and first modes exhibited the smallest and largest disparities between experimental and simulated natural frequencies, respectively, at 0.68% and 10.24%.
Conclusion
While there are certain limitations, it is undeniable that Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) applications are advantageous for predicting the natural frequencies and vibration modes of spherical fruits such as oranges. Utilizing the obtained frequencies, especially the resonance frequency and the vibrational mode shape, enables us to avoid the resonance frequency in the actual transportation of oranges. This is possible through the implementation of suitable packaging and transportation methods, thereby mitigating the deterioration of fruit quality and ensuring an accurate prediction of its shelf life.

Keywords

• Dynamic Behavior Modeling
• Modal Analysis
• Vibration modes

Main Subjects

• Post-harvest technologies

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

1. Abbaszadeh, R., Rajabipour, A., Sadrnia, H., Mahjoob, M. J., Delshad, M., & Ahmadi, H. )2014(. Application of modal analysis to the watermelon through finite element modeling for use in ripeness assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 127, 80- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.020
2. Ahmadi, E., & Barikloo, H. )2016a .(Viscoelastic finite element analysis of the dynamic behavior of apple under impact loading with regard to its different layers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 121, 1-11. https://doi.org/1016/j.compag.2015.11.017
3. Ahmadi, E., & Barikloo, H. )2016b(. Mechanical property evaluation of apricot fruits under quasi-static and dynamic loading. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 6(1), 139-152. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v6i1.29489
4. Celik, H. K. )2017(. Determination of bruise susceptibility of pears (Ankara variety) to impact load by means of FEM-based explicit dynamics simulation. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 128, 83- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.01.015
5. Celik, H. K., Rennie, A. E. W., & Akinci, I. )2011(. Deformation behaviour simulation of an apple under drop case by finite element method. Journal of Food Engineering, 104, 293- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.020
6. Chen, L., &Opara, U. L. )2013(. Texture measurement approaches in fresh and processed foods - A review. Food Research International, 51, 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.01.046
7. Coelho, A. L. F., Santos, F. L., Queiroz, D. M., & Pinto, F. A. C. )2016(. Dynamic behavior of the fruit-stem-branch system using stochastic finite element method. Coffee Science, 11(1), 1-10. http://www.sbicafe.ufv.br:80/handle/123456789/8167
8. Couck, , Ketelaere, B. De., & Baerdemaeker, J. De. )2003(. Experimental analysis of the dynamic, mechanical behavior of a chicken egg. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 266, 711-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00596-0
9. Entwistle, K. )2001(. Basic Principles of the Finite Element Method. IOM Communications.
10. Fadiji, T., Coetzee, C. J., Berry, T. M., & Opara, U. L. )2019(. Investigating the role of geometrical configurations of ventilated fresh produce packaging to improve the mechanical strength– experimental and numerical approaches. Food Packaging and Shelf, 20, 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100312
11. Gao, Y., Song, C., & Rao, X. (2018). Image processing-aided fea for monitoring dynamic response of potato tubers to impact loading. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, 21- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.027
12. Gyasi, S., Fridley, R. B., & Chen, P. (1981). Elastic and viscoelastic Poisson's ratio determination for selected citrus fruits. Transactions of the ASAE, 24(3), 747-0750. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34332
13. Gyeong-Won, K., Gab-Soo, Y., & Yasuyuki, S. )2008(. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Whole Apple Using Finite Element Method Based on Three-Dimensional Real Geometry. Food Science and Technology Research, 14(4), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.14.329
14. He, J., & Fu, Z. F. (2001). Modal Analysis: Butterworth-Heinemann. Hoffman, J. D., & Frankel, S. (2001). Numerical methods for engineers and scientists: CRC press.
15. Kabas, O., Celik, H. K., Ozmerzi, A., & Akinci, İ. (2008). Drop test simulation of a sample tomato with finite element method. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88, 1537-1541. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3246
16. Láng, Z. (2006). Dynamic modelling structure of a fruit tree for inertial shaker system design. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.09.003
17. Lu, R., Srivastava, A. K., & Ababneh, H. A. A. )2006(. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation of bio yield probes for measuring apple fruit firmness. Transactions of the ASAE, 49, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20220
18. Mirzaei, R., Minaei, S., Khoshtaghaza, M., & Borghei, M. )2013(. Evaluation of natural frequencies apple using finite element modal analysis. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 3, 48-57. (in Persian).
19. Mizrach, A. )2007(. Nondestructive ultrasonic monitoring of tomato quality during shelf-life storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46, 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.05.012
20. Mohsenin, N. )1986(. Physical properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Sci.publ, New York, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19870310724
21. Namdari Gharaghani, B., Maghsoudi, H., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Ripeness detection of orange fruit using experimental and finite element modal analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 261, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108958
22. Salarikia, A., Miraei Ashtiani, S. H., Golzarian, M. R., & Mohammadinezhad, H. )2017(. Finite element analysis of the dynamic behavior of pear under impact loading. Information Processing in Agriculture, 4, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.12.003
23. Santos, F. L., Queiroz, D. M., Valente, D. S. M., & Coelho, A. L. F. )2015(. Simulation of the dynamic behavior of the coffee fruit-stem system using finite element method. Acta Scientiarum Technol, 37, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v37i1.19814
24. Seyedabadi, E., Khojastehpour, M., & Sadrnia, H. )2015(. Predicting Cantaloupe Bruising Using Non-Linear Finite Element Method. International Journal of Food Properties, 18(9), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.951892
25. Song, H. Z., Wang, J., & Li, Y. H. )2006(. Studies on vibration characteristics of a pear using finite element method. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 7, 491-496. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.b0491
26. Tinoco, H. A., Ocampo, D. A., Pena, F. M., & Sanz-Uribe, J. R. )2014(. Finite element modal analysis of the fruit-peduncle of Coffee arabica L. var. Colombia estimating its geometrical and mechanical properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 108, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.06.011
27. Tinoco, H. A., & Peña, F. M. (2018). Harmonic stress analysis on Coffeaar´abica Var. Colombia fruits in order to simulate the selective detachment. A Finite Element Analysis, 94(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549717738068
28. Villibor, G. P., Santos, F. L., Queiroz, D. M., Khoury Junior, J. K., & Pinto, F. A. C. )2019(. Dynamic behavior of coffee fruit-stem system using modelling of flexible bodies. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 166, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105009
29. Wang, F., Ma, S., Wei, W., Zhang, Y., & Z. )2017(. Frequency sweep test and modal analysis of watermelon during transportation. International Journal of Food Engineering, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2016-0362
30. Yousefi, S., Farsi, H., & Kheiralipour, K. )2016(. Drop test of pear fruit: Experimental measurement and finite element modelling. Biosystems Engineering, 147, 17- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.03.004
31. Zhang, H., Wu, J., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. )2018(. Nondestructive firmness measurement of differently shaped pears with a dual-frequency index based on acoustic vibration. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 138, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.12.002