Precision Farming
M. Safaeinejad; M. Ghasemi-Nejad Raeini; M. Taki
Abstract
IntroductionOne of the key structural factors in agricultural mechanization is the selection of appropriate technology. Today, examining the effects of technology application and development on agricultural production remains of highly importance. Innovative technologies, such as spraying drones, play ...
Read More
IntroductionOne of the key structural factors in agricultural mechanization is the selection of appropriate technology. Today, examining the effects of technology application and development on agricultural production remains of highly importance. Innovative technologies, such as spraying drones, play a critical role in advancing agriculture and ensuring food security. Without these technologies and proper input management, environmental impacts are likely to intensify. Achieving sustainable production and ensuring food security is a major challenge for researchers and global policymakers. This study evaluates and compares the performance of spraying drones and boom sprayers in controlling weeds and yellow rust disease in wheat fields. The aim of this study is to optimize pesticide use and achieve sustainable agriculture.Materials and MethodsThis research was conducted to evaluate the field performance and economic feasibility of using spraying drones compared to boom sprayers for controlling weeds and yellow rust disease in wheat fields. Experiments were carried out in regional Khorramabad, Iran, using a DJI Agras MG-1P spraying drone and a 400-liter 400B8 TF boom sprayer. The aim was to investigate the impact of modern technology, specifically spraying drones, compared to traditional methods, such as boom sprayers, for managing weeds and yellow rust disease. Additionally, the study assessed the profitability of these technologies. The experiments followed a randomized complete block design with three treatments: boom sprayer, spraying drone, and control. They were conducted in two separate, independent fields to examine treatment effects on weeds and yellow rust in wheat. For weeds control, 2-4-D herbicide was applied at 1.5 L ha-1, and for yellow rust control, Tilt fungicide was used at 0.5 L ha-1.Results and DiscussionResults showed that the deposition rate of pesticides in boom sprayers (82.8%) was higher than with drone spraying (69.9%). Furthermore, the average dry weight of weeds in boom sprayer was 172 g m-2, and in drone spraying, it was 163 g m-2, which was not statistically significant. Additionally, the average weed density was 25 plants per square meter for boom sprayers and 29.3 plants per square meter for drone spraying, with no statistically significant difference. The average harvest index in weed control experiments was 44% for boom sprayer and 41% for drone spraying, which was statistically significant at the 1% level. The average severity of yellow rust infection in wheat fields was 30.7% for boom sprayer and 25.3% for drone spraying, which was not statistically significant at the 1% level, but both treatments were significantly different from the control (68.3%). The harvest index in yellow rust experiments was better in drone spraying (43.8%) compared to boom sprayer (41.9%). The total annual cost for drone owners in the studied region (2980.3 million rials) was higher than the total cost for boom sprayer owners (513.48 million rials). However, the benefit-cost ratio for drone owners (1.215) exceeded that of boom sprayer owners (1.030), demonstrating economic viability for both sprayers. Overall, drones are found to be more economical for spraying than boom sprayers due to their higher efficiency and profitability. The use of drones can significantly increase the efficiency and profitability of spraying operations.ConclusionThe results of this study showed that both drone and boom sprayer were effective in reducing the dry weight of weeds, but there was no statistically significant difference between them. Weed density was higher with drone spraying, and the harvest index was better with drone spraying compared to boom sprayer. The costs of using drones were higher than boom sprayers, but despite the higher costs, drones are superior option for spraying due to their increased efficiency and profitability.
