Precision Farming
M. Saadikhani; M. Maharlooei; M. A. Rostami; M. Edalat
Abstract
IntroductionRemote sensing is defined as data acquisition about an object or a phenomenon related to a geographic location without physical. The use of remote sensing data is expanding rapidly. Researchers have always been interested in accurately classifying land coverage phenomena using multispectral ...
Read More
IntroductionRemote sensing is defined as data acquisition about an object or a phenomenon related to a geographic location without physical. The use of remote sensing data is expanding rapidly. Researchers have always been interested in accurately classifying land coverage phenomena using multispectral images. One of the factors that reduces the accuracy of the classification map is the existence of uneven surfaces and high-altitude areas. The presence of high-altitude points makes it difficult for the sensors to obtain accurate reflection information from the surface of the phenomena. Radar imagery used with the digital elevation model (DEM) is effective for identifying and determining altitude phenomena. Image fusion is a technique that uses two sensors with completely different specifications and takes advantage of both of the sensors' capabilities. In this study, the feasibility of employing the fusion technique to improve the overall accuracy of classifying land coverage phenomena using time series NDVI images of Sentinel 2 satellite imagery and PALSAR radar imagery of ALOS satellite was investigated. Additionally, the results of predicted and measured areas of fields under cultivation of wheat, barley, and canola were studied.Materials and MethodsThirteen Sentinel-2 multispectral satellite images with 10-meter spatial resolution from the Bajgah region in Fars province, Iran from Nov 2018 to June 2019 were downloaded at the Level-1C processing level to classify the cultivated lands and other phenomena. Ground truth data were collected through several field visits using handheld GPS to pinpoint different phenomena in the region of study. The seven classes of distinguished land coverage and phenomena include (1) Wheat, (2) Barley, (3) Canola, (4) Tree, (5) Residential regions, (6) Soil, and (7) others. After the preprocessing operations such as radiometric and atmospheric corrections using predefined built-in algorithms recommended by other researchers in ENVI 5.3, and cropping the region of interest (ROI) from the original image, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was calculated for each image. The DEM was obtained from the PALSAR sensor radar image with the 12.5-meter spatial resolution of the ALOS satellite. After preprocessing and cropping the ROI, a binary mask of radar images was created using threshold values of altitudes between 1764 and 1799 meters above the sea level in ENVI 5.3. The NDVI time series was then composed of all 13 images and integrated with radar images using the pixel-level integration method. The purpose of this process was to remove the high-altitude points in the study area that would reduce the accuracy of the classification map. The image fusion process was also performed using ENVI 5.3. The support Vector Machine (SVM) classification method was employed to train the classifier for both fused and unfused images as suggested by other researchers.To evaluate the effectiveness of image fusion, Commission and Omission errors, and the Overall accuracy were calculated using a Confusion matrix. To study the accuracy of the estimated area under cultivation of main crops in the region versus the actual measured values of the area, regression equation and percentage of difference were calculated.Results and DiscussionVisual inspection of classified output maps shows the difference between the fused and unfused images in classifying similar classes such as buildings and structures versus regions covered with bare soil and lands under cultivation versus natural vegetation in high altitude points. Statistical metrics verified these visual evaluations. The SVM algorithm in fusion mode resulted in 98.06% accuracy and 0.97 kappa coefficient, 7.5% higher accuracy than the unfused images.As stated earlier, the similarities between the soil class (stones and rocks in the mountains) and manmade buildings and infrastructures increase omission error and misclassification in unfused image classification. The same misclassification occurred for the visually similar croplands and shallow vegetation at high altitude points. These results were consistence with previous literature that reported the same misclassification in analogous classes. The predicted area under cultivation of wheat and barley were overestimated by 3 and 1.5 percent, respectively. However, for canola, the area was underestimated by 3.5 percent.ConclusionThe main focus of this study was employing the image fusion technique and improving the classification accuracy of satellite imagery. Integration of PALSAR sensor data from ALOS radar satellite with multi-spectral imagery of Sentinel 2 satellite enhanced the classification accuracy of output maps by eliminating the high-altitude points and biases due to rocks and natural vegetation at hills and mountains. Statistical metrics such as the overall accuracy, Kappa coefficient, and commission and omission errors confirmed the visual findings of the fused vs. unfused classification maps.
S. Rahnama; M. Maharlooei; M. A. Rostami; H. Maghsoudi
Abstract
Introduction Date palm is one of the most valuable horticultural products in Iran, which includes 16% of non-oil exports to the world. Kerman province has the second rank for the cultivation area of date palm in Iran. Having information about the exact cultivated area has gained importance for further ...
Read More
Introduction Date palm is one of the most valuable horticultural products in Iran, which includes 16% of non-oil exports to the world. Kerman province has the second rank for the cultivation area of date palm in Iran. Having information about the exact cultivated area has gained importance for further decision makings. To determine the cultivated area, organizations usually use census which has the disadvantages of high cost, wasting time and labor intensive. The aim of this research was to study the feasibility of using Landsat 8 OLI images to identify and classify the area under date palm cultivation. To accomplish this purpose, four supervised classification methods were evaluated. Materials and Methods The study area was in Bam region located at 200 km southeast of Kerman province. In this research, a total of 14 images of Landsat8 OLI satellite from the study area during fall and winter were downloaded from Landsat official web page. After preliminary inspections for interested classes (Date palm gardens, Lands covered with bare soil and forage crop fields), one of the images that was taken on Jan 14, 2017, was selected for further analysis. After initial corrections and processing, 32 images of alfalfa farms, 32 images of date palm gardens and 32 images of lands covered with bare soil, were selected using GPS data points collected in study area scouting. Shape files of all selected fields were created and utilized for supervised classification training set. The same process was also done for the unsupervised classification method. To evaluate the classification methods confusion matrix and Kappa coefficient were used to determine the true and miss-classified area under date palm cultivation. It is worth mentioning that these factors alone cannot identify the most powerful method for classification and they just give us a general overview to choose acceptable methods among all available methods. To identify the most powerful method among selected methods, confusion matrix and investigating the pixel transfers between classes is the crucial method. Results and Discussion Results of classifications revealed that the overall classification accuracy by using NN, MLC, SVM, MDC, and K-Means were 99.10% (kappa 0.973), 98.77% (kappa 0.975), 98.66% (kappa 0.973), 98.52% (kappa 0.97), and 52.66% (kappa 0.31) respectively. Concerning the confusion matrix in the NN method, the percentage of producer accuracy error in date palm class was 0% and in user, accuracy error was 1.44%. In the review of other methods, the lowest producer accuracy error value in date palm class obtained by NN and SVM methods was 0% and the highest producer accuracy error belonged to MLC method which was 1.35%. Checking the recognition power of other classes showed that in the soil class, the highest producer accuracy error was 2.32% by MDC method and the least one was 0.64% by MLC. For forage class, the highest producer accuracy error was calculated 37.07% by SVM and the least accurate one was 4.92% by MDC. Although the K-Means method with Kappa Coefficient of 0.31 did not have a good classification quality, concerning classes and samples, it successfully could identify date palm according to selective samples with 100% accuracy. Results of calculated date palm area using supervised classification methods versus actual area measurements showed that NN and SVM methods with the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9995% and 0.9986% had the highest coefficients. K-Means method with R-square of 0.9228% had a good correlation. In general, all supervised classification methods obtained acceptable results for distinguishing between date palm classes and two other classes. NN and SVM methods could successfully recognize date palm class. K-Means method also could recognize date palm class but the recognition included some errors such as dark clay soil textures which were classified as the date palm. Conclusion In general, overall accuracy and kappa Coefficient alone cannot identify the most powerful method for classifying and these methods just give us a general overview to choose an acceptable percentage of accuracy coefficients among available methods. After the initial selection, to identify the most powerful method of classification the pixel transfer calculations in a confusion matrix would be an acceptable technique.
