with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Systems Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Mechanics of Biosystems Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Today, grapes are cultivated in a vast zone worldwide. Grapes are among the major horticultural produced in Iran and the country is ranked 10th in the world for the grape production. Therefore, efficient use of energy from this crop is very important. Energy is one of the principal requirements for the economic growth and development of agriculture. Scientific forecasts and analysis of energy consumption will be of great importance for planning the energy strategies and policies. The enhancement of the energy efficiency not only helps in improving competitiveness through cost reduction but also results in minimized greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and environmental impacts. In other hand, energy analysis in the crop production systems enables to identify the effective farming system in different farm size with respect to energy parameters. Based on mentioned points, the objective of this study was to evaluate the energy flow of grape production in three sizes (small, medium and large) of land and then, the life cycle of the production in Hazavah Region of Arak city, Iran.
Materials and Methods
In this study, data were obtained from 58 growers using face-to-face questionnaires in Arak county of Iran. Orchards were selected using stratified random sampling. Investigation of the energy flow in a production system necessitate calculating input–output energies. In order to deal with this part, energy coefficients were taken into account to convert all agricultural inputs to their energy equivalent. In other words, each input was converted to its energy equivalent by multiplying the application rate of agricultural inputs used within the system by its energy coefficient. In order to evaluate how efficient, the system under study is, some well-known indicators have been introduced and widely applied when a production system is appraised. In this study, a life cycle approach was used for assessment of environment impacts of the grapes production. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) refers to the process of compiling and evaluating the inputs, outputs and the potential environmental impacts of a product system throughout its life cycle. Goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment and life cycle interpretation are four mandatory steps, which should be followed in a full LCA study. The characterization factors used in this study were adapted from Simapro software which is linked to EcoInvent database.
Results and Discussion
On average, the values of consumed and produced energies were 1854 MJ ton−1 and 11800 MJ ton−1, respectively. Among all input energies, chemical fertilizers held the first rank with an amount of about 704 MJ ton−1. It accounted for 38% of the total energy used in the production season.  Energy use efficiency, which is a ratio between output and input energy, was calculated as 5.75. Also, the energy productivity was estimated as 0.48, meaning that 0.48 kg grapes is produced when one MJ energy is consumed. The total Global Warming (GW) was calculated as 508.63 kg CO2 eq. ton−1. The farm size had an influential effect on the GW and other impact categories. An increase in the farm size led to reduction in the environment impacts. It means that the value of GW for large farms fell at 498.68 kg CO2 eq. ton−1 and the value of GW for small farms fell at 698.69 kg CO2 eq. ton−1. The upshot was that GW and other impact categories for large farms were significantly less than its counterpart in small farms due to the high value of grapes produced in large farm groups. Impacts of manure played a more important role on GW. Also, direct emissions of chemical fertilizers made high contribution to acidification and eutrophication. Management of using chemical fertilizers can be an appropriate way to reduce the acidification, eutrophication and other environmental impacts on the grape production.
 
Conclusion
Chemical fertilizers (38%), demonstrated their pivotal roles in total energy consumption. The direct emissions in the grape production resulted from high application of chemical fertilizers contributed considerably to some environmental impacts. It suggested establishing a sustainable and environmental friendly grape production system in the region with application of efficient fertilizers by integrated nutrient management.

Keywords

Anonymous. 2014. Agricultural Statistics of Iran, 2013-2014.Horticultural Products, Statistical publications.
2. Brentrup, F., J. Küsters, J. Lammel, and H. Kuhlmann. 2000. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5: 349-357.
3. Ingrao, C. A., C. Matarazzo, M. Tricase, T. Clasadonte, and D. Huisingh. 2015. Life cycle assessment for highlighting environmental hotspots in Sicilian peach production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 92: 109-120.
4. Chaudhary, V., B. Gangwar, and D. Pandey. 2006. Auditing of energy use and output of different cropping systems in India. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.
5. Elhami, B., A. Akram, and M. Khanali. 2016. Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Information Processing in Agriculture 3: 190-205.
6. FAO. 2014. World food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome: 2014.
7. Ferrari, A. M., M. Pini, D. Sassi, E. Zerazion, and P. Neri. 2017. Effects of grape quality on the environmental profile of an Italian vineyard for Lambrusco red wine production. Journal of Cleaner Production.
8. Hamedani, S., R. A. Keyhani, and R. Alimardani. 2011. Energy use patterns and econometric models of grape production in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 36: 6345-6351.
9. IPCC. 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Japan 2: 48-56.
10. ISO, I. 2006. 14040 International standards. Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
11. Karimi, M., and H. Moghaddam. 2016. On-farm energy flow in grape orchards. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences.
12. Kitani, O. 1999. CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering: Plant production engineering. American Society of Agricultural & Biological Engineers.
13. Mani, I., P. Kumar, J. Panwar, and K. Kant. 2007. Variation in energy consumption in production of wheat–maize with varying altitudes in hilly regions of Himachal Pradesh, India. Energy 32: 2336-2339.
14. Mardani, A., and H. Taghavifar. 2016. An overview on energy inputs and environmental emissions of grape production in West Azerbayjan of Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54: 918-924.
15. Marras, S., S. Masia, P. Duce, D. Spano, and C. Sirca. 2015. Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 214: 350-356.
16. Mousavi-Avval, S., H. S. Rafiee, and A. Mohammadi. 2011. Optimization of energy consumption and input costs for apple production in Iran using data envelopment analysis. Energy 36 (2): 909-916.
17. Mousavi-Avval, S., H. S. Rafiee, M. Sharifi, S. Hosseinpour, B. Notarnicola, G. Tassielli, and P. A. Renzulli. 2017. Application of multi-objective genetic algorithms for optimization of energy, economics and environmental life cycle assessment in oilseed production. Journal of Cleaner Production 140: 804-815.
18. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., R. Abdi, S. Rafiee, and H., G. Mobtaker. 2014. Optimization of energy required and greenhouse gas emissions analysis for orange producers using data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 311-317.
19. Nemecek, T., T. Kägi, and S. Blaser. 2007. Life cycle inventories of agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent v2. 0 No 15.
20. Ozkan, B., C. Fert, and C. F. Karadeniz. 2007. Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and open-field grape production. Energy 32: 1500-1504.
21. Point, E., P. Tyedmers, C. Naugler. 2012. Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production 27: 11-20.
22. Rathke, G. W., and W. Diepenbrock. 2006. Energy balance of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cropping as related to nitrogen supply and preceding crop. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 35-44.
23. Rebitzer, G., T. Ekvall, R. Frischknecht, D. Hunkeler, G. Norris, T. Rydberg, W. P. Schmidt, S. Suh, B. P. Weidema, and D. W. Pennington. 2004. Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International 30: 701-720.
24. Sahle, A., and J. Potting. 2013. Environmental life cycle assessment of Ethiopian rose cultivation. Science of the Total Environment 443: 163-172.
25. Soltanali, H., B. Emadi, A. Rohani, M. Khojastehpour, and A. Nikkhah. 2015. Life cycle assessment modeling of milk production in Iran. Information Processing in Agriculture 2 (2): 101-108.
26. Soltanali, H., A. Nikkhah, and A. Rohani. 2017. Energy audit of Iranian kiwifruit production using intelligent systems. Energy 139: 646-654.
27. Tzilivakis, J., D. Warner, M. May, K. Lewis, and K. Jaggard. 2005. An assessment of the energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) production in the UK. Agricultural Systems 85: 101-119.
28. Vazquez-Rowe, I., P. Villanueva-Rey, D. Iribarren, M., T. Moreira and G. Feijoo. 2012. Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rias Baixas appellation (NW Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production 27: 92-102.
29. Zangeneh, M., M. Omid, and A. Akram. 2010. A comparative study on energy use and cost analysis of potato production under different farming technologies in Hamadan province of Iran. Energy 35: 2927-2933.
CAPTCHA Image