with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article-en

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Biosystems Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz

Abstract

A robust numerical analysis was proposed for simulating the rebound velocity pendulum method for melon. For considered varieties (Zard-Eyvanekey and Sousky-Sabz varieties), the change in impact parameters (extracted from excitation by pendulum) was studied for five stages of ripening. With the melon ripeness, the rebound velocity, rebound height, relative rebound height, rebound angle, rebound energy and coefficient of restitution (velocity ratio) increased, while the absorbed energy decreased (from 37.6 to 27.9 MJ for Zard-Eyvanekey and from 38.5 to 27.9 MJ for Sousky-Sabz). The regression analysis showed a highly significant linear relationship (coefficient of determination, R² more than 0.8059) between impact parameters and five stages of ripening. So the results of the analysis are feasible in ripening detection and hence in the classification of the melon maturity.

Keywords

Open Access

©2020 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

1. Amer Eissa, A. 2004. A portable pendulum for impact characterization of whole eggshell. Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering 21: 1-13.
2. De Ketelaere, B., M. S. Howarth, L. Crezee, J. Lammertyn, K. Viaene, I. Bulens, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2006. Postharvest firmness changes as measured by acoustic and low-mass impact devices: a comparison of techniques. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 275-284.
3. Delwiche, M. J., T. McDonald, and S. V. Bowers. 1987. Determination of peach firmness by analysis of impact forces. Transactions of the ASAE 30: 249-0254.
4. Gan-Mor, S., and N. Galili. 2000. Rheological model of fruit collision with an elastic plate. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 75: 139-147.
5. Garcıa-Ramos, F., J. Ortiz-Canavate, M. Ruiz-Altisent, J. Dıez, L. Flores, I. Homer, and J. Chavez. 2003. Development and implementation of an on-line impact sensor for firmness sensing of fruits. Journal of Food Engineering 58: 53-57.
6. Garcia-Ramos, F. J., C. Valero, I. Homer, J. Ortiz-Cañavate, and M. Ruiz-Altisent. 2005. Non-destructive fruit firmness sensors: a review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 61-73.
7. Homer, I., F. J. Garcia-Ramos, J. Ortiz-Cañavate, and M. Ruiz-Altisent. 2010. Evaluation of nondestructive impact sensor to determine on-line fruit firmness. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 70: 67-74.
8. Idah, P., E. Ajisegiri, and M. Yisa. 2007. An assessment of impact damage to fresh tomato fruits. Au Jt 10: 271-275.
9. Kafashan, J., M. V. Zeebroeck, H. Sadrnia, D. Moshou, J. d. Baerdemaeker, B. Nicolai, H. Ramon, and B. Tijskens. 2008. Effects of impact locations on mechanical and dynamical properties of fruits. Agricultural and biosystems engineering for a sustainable world. International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, 23-25 June, 2008: European Society of Agricultural Engineers (AgEng).
10. Khalifa, S., M. H. Komarizadeh, and B. Tousi. 2011. Usage of fruit response to both force and forced vibration applied to assess fruit firmness-a review. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 516.
11. Khoshnam, F., S. R. Hasan-Beigi, M. Namjoo, and M. Doroozi. 2017. The effect of acoustic system variables on sound signals of Melon varieties. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 7: 126-139.
12. Lien, C.-C., and C.-H. Ting. 2014. Assessing guava maturity by statistical analyses of dropped fruit impact responses. Postharvest Biology and Technology 95: 20-27.
13. Lien, C.-C., C. Ay, and C.-H. Ting. 2009. Non-destructive impact test for assessment of tomato maturity. Journal of Food Engineering 91: 402-407.
14. Mao, J., Y. Yu, X. Rao, and J. Wang. 2016. Firmness prediction and modeling by optimizing acoustic device for watermelons. Journal of Food Engineering 168: 1-6.
15. Namjoo, M., F. Khoshnam, H. Golbakhshi, and M. Dowlati. 2016. Kavun Meyve Olgunlaşmasında Fiziksel ve Mekanik Değişiklikler. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi: 135-144.
16. Nourain, J. 2012. Application of Acoustic Properties in Non–Destructive Quality Evaluation of Agricultural Products. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2: 668-675.
17. Ragni, L., A. Berardinelli, and A. Guarnieri. 2010. Impact device for measuring the flesh firmness of kiwifruits. Journal of Food Engineering 96: 591-597.
18. Saadatinia, M., B. Emadi, and H. Sadrnia. 2014. Evaluation of Watermelon Ripeness by Analyzing Sounds Generated from Imposed Impact. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 4: 296-304.
19. Yurtlu, Y. B. 2012. Comparison of nondestructive impact and acoustic techniques for measuring firmness in peaches. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 10: 180-185.
CAPTCHA Image