Investigating The Long-term Effect of Preventive Maintenance Strategy on The Operational Efficiency and Failure Rate of Sugarcane Harvester Using Time Series

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• F. Afsharnia
• A. Marzban

Agricultural Machinery Engineering Department, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Ahvaz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v10i2.70962

Abstract

Introduction
Optimal operation and maintenance of engineering systems heavily relies on the accurate prediction of their failures. Repairable engineering systems are well known in industries. A repairable engineering system indicates that the performance of this system after each failure can be restored through suitable maintenance. It is normally a complex system composed of a number of components. Failure prediction of a repairable system and its subsystems is an important topic in the reliability engineering. One of the most important repairable systems in agro-industrial companies is the sugarcane harvester. This machine has a key role in harvesting operations of sugarcane plant. The failures of this machine causes delay in operations and reduce products yield and quality. Currently, preventive maintenance is conducted on these harvesters to improve the overall reliability of these systems. Therefore, in this study, the long-term effect of preventive maintenance strategy on the efficiency and failure rate of the sugarcane harvester was investigated.
Materials and Methods
This research was carried out on 30 sugarcane harvesters used by sugarcane and by Products Development Company of Khuzestan during 6 years period. The goal of this study was to introduce a methodology aimed to acquire the information to predict the effect of preventive maintenance strategy on the failure rate and efficiency of sugarcane harvester by time series. Time series forecasting is the use of a model to predict future values based on previously observed values. The expected shape is a forecast from a combination of an ARIMA models (AR, MA, ARMA and ARIMA). The first step in analyzing the time series is plotting the data and obtaining the sample records. The next step is consideration of a trend and periodic components and remove them from the time series and fitting the static model on the time series. The next stage is implementation of the data normalization using skewness coefficient method and their normalization through logarithm differentiation of data. The arithmetic mean of data was applied to obtain zero average of the time series. Sample ACF (Auto Correlation Function) and PACF (Partial Auto Correlation Function) was drawn and then the model rank "a" was recognized and selected by comparison of ACF and PACF for AR, MA, ARMA, and ARIMA models.
Results and Discussion
According to the results of failure rate related to the sugarcane harvester, it can be found that the mean failure rate of this machine for the 6-years period was equal to 0.147 per hour. The minimum and maximum value of the failure rate were 0 and 0.517 per hour, respectively. The mean annual use hours of these harvesters was 189.8 h. Although the accumulated used hours increased, the mean time between failures (MTBF) was increased. According to Jacobs et al. (1983), the machines may breakdown due to a design defect, physical damage, or normal wear and tear, but many times machines fail because of a neglect and the lack of properly scheduled maintenance. In this study, implemented preventive maintenance resulted in decreasing of failure rate and increasing of machine efficiency as well. In 2016, the failure rate of sugarcane harvester was decreased by 73.23% and the machine efficiency was increased by 14.9%  compared to 2011, because timely preventative maintenance and inspection will not only help to reduce major problems and downtime, but it will also help to identify problems when they can be corrected with relatively minor repairs. Among the 12 studied subsystems, topper, electric and motor subsystems were more affected by preventive maintenance by 94.75%, 80.46% and 58.74% decreasing in the failure rate, respectively. With regard to the evaluation criteria such as AIC, MAPE and RMSE, the ARIMA (1, 3, 2) model was determined as a suitable model for predicting the failure rate of sugarcane harvester. Furthermore, there is no significant difference between statistical descriptive measures of forecasting and actual tractor failure rate that it represents high accuracy of forecasting via ARIMA model.
 Conclusion
This study was adapted to the preventive maintenance as a useful strategy that could increase availability and operational efficiency of the sugarcane harvester. Furthermore, it focused on time series modeling method to analyze and forecast the reliability characteristics such as the expected number of failures per interval (failure rate). It is found that time series model is a viable alternative that gives satisfactory results for interval failure predictions in terms of its predictive performance for the sugarcane harvester reliability.

Keywords

• Sugarcane harvester
• forecasting
• ARIMA
• Efficiency

20.1001.1.22286829.1399.10.2.19.7

Open Access

©2020 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Afsharnia, F. 2017. Failure Rate Analysis. PP 99-115 in A. Ali eds. Failure Analysis and Prevention. Intech Open, London.

2. Afsharnia, F., M. A. Asoodar, and A. Abdeshahi. 2014. Regression Analysis Modeling the Failure Rate and Finding the Effective Failure Factors of Tractors in Khuzestan province. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 36 (2): 49-58. (In Farsi).

3. Almasi, M., and H. R. Yaganeh. 2002. Determining a suitable mathematical model to predict the repair and maintenance costs of farm tractors in Karoon agro-industry co. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 33 (4): 707-716. (In Farsi).

4. Amari, V., and McLaughlin. 2006. Cost effective condition-based maintenance using markov decision processes. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 1-6.

5. Amin, A., L. Grunske, and A. Colman. 2013. An approach to software reliability prediction based on time series modeling. Journal of Systems and Software 86 (7): 1923-1932.

6. Aneke, D. O. 1994. A Survey of farm power problem in Nigeria. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 10 (5): 623-626.

7. Anonymous. 2004. Eviews 5 User’s Guide. Quantitative Micro Software, LLC. Eviews Inc.

8. Atashgar, K., and A. Saravany. 2016. Failure prediction and diagnostic analysis for lathes using a hybrid approach including artificial neural network and decision making block. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management 27 (2): 143-156. (In Farsi).

9. Bowers, W., and D. Hunt. 1970. Application of Mathematical Formulas to Repair Cost. Transactions of the ASAE. 13 (6): 806-809.

10. Box, G. E. P., G. M. Jenkins, and G. C. Reinsel. 2014. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. Translated by Meshkani, M.R. Sharif University of Technology press. 4th edition. 842pp.

11. Currie, R. G. 1989. Comments on power spectra and Coherence of Drought in the interior Plains. International Journal of Climatology 9: 91-100.

12. Day, R. H. 1965. Probability distributions of field crop yields. Journal of Farm Economics 47: 713-741.

13. Dodangeh, S., J. S. Abedi Koupai, and A. Gohari. 2012. Application of time series modeling to investigate future climatic parameters trend for water resources management purposes. Journal of Water and Soil Science 16 (59): 59-74. (In Farsi).

14. El-Din, A. G., and D. W. Smith. 2002. A neural network model to predict the wastewater inflow incorporating rainfall events. Water Research 36 (1): 115-112.

15. Engle, R. F. and C. W. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 251-276.

16. Faraj zadeh, Z., and A. Shah Vahi, 2009. Forecasting agricultural crops prices: case study of cotton, rice and saffron. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development 17 (67): 43-72. (In Farsi).

17. Garcia, F. P., D. J. Pedregal, and C. Roberts. 2010. Time series methods applied to failure prediction and detection. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 95 (6): 698-703.

18. Grisso, R. D., and R. Pitman. 2009. Five strategies for extending machinery life. Extension engineer, Biological Systems Engineering Department. University of Nebraska USA, 442-451.

19. Hall, R. A., and L. K. Daneshmend. 2010. Reliability modeling of surface mining equipment: data gathering and analysis methodologies. International Journal of Surface Mining and Reclamation and Environment 17 (3): 139-155.

20. Hansen, R. C. 2008. Overall equipment effectiveness. Translated by Ahmadi, H. Arkan Danesh press. 288 pp. (In Farsi).

21. Jacobs, C. O., W. R. Harrell, and G. C. Shinn. 1983. Agricultural power and machinery. McGraw-Hill. Inc. New York.

22. Kader, M., T. Ramani, J. Johnson, C. Speigelman, and J. Zietsman. 2014. FLEET equipment perf ormance measurement preventive maintenance model: final report. Texas department of transportation Federal highway administration. Texas a&m transportation institute. 76 PP.

23. Karbasi, M., M. Shahsavari, O. Veisi, and S. Fathi, 2011. Enhancement of equipment efficiency in the army through applying predictive, forecasting and comprehensively productive network-based repair and maintenance methods. Military Management Journal 43 (11): 103-134. (In Farsi).

24. Khodabakhshian, R., and M. Shakeri, 2011. Prediction of repair and maintenance costs of farm tractors by using of Preventive Maintenance. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 3 (1): 39-44.

25. Ma, L., Y. Sun, and J. Mathew. 2007. Effects of Preventive Maintenance on the reliability of production lines. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM 2007): 631-635, Singapore.

26. Monjezi, N., H. Zaki Dizaji, M. J. Sheikhdavoodi, A. Marzban, and M. Shomeili. 2017. Application of fuzzy GERT method in operations scheduling of sugarcane production. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 40 (1): 125-139.

27. Morris, J. 1988. Estimation of Tractor Repair and Maintenance Costs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 41: 191-200.

28. Najafi, P., M. A. Asoodar, A. Marzban, and M. Hormozi. 2014. Reliability evaluation and analysis of sugarcane 7000 series harvesters in sugarcane harvesting. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5 (2): 446-455. (In Farsi).

29. Pinches, G. E. 1970. The Random Walk. Hypothesis and Technical Analysis. Financial Analysis Journal. (March- April 1970): 104-110.

30. Rasekhi, R., and M. Shamsi. 2010. A case study for determining and evaluation a mathematical model to predict the repair and maintenance costs of MF285 tractors. 6th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Tehran. Iran. (In Farsi).

31. Rohani, A. 2013. Prediction of tractor repair and maintenance costs using rbf neural network. World Applied Sciences Journal 28 (12): 1929-1937.

32. Rohani, A., I. Ranjbar, Y. Ajabshir, M. H. Abbaspour-Fard and M. Valizadeh. 2009. Prediction of two-wheel drive tractor repair and maintenance costs using artificial neural network in comparing with regression. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources. 16 (Special issue 1-a): 225-235.

33. Sabir, M. S., M. A. Zaidi, and G. S. Sheikh. 1990. Mathematical model for repair and maintenance costs of agricultural machinery. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 27 (1): 30-33.

34. Saplioglu, K., M. Cimen, and B. Akman. 2010. Daily precipitation prediction in Isparta station by artificial neural network: Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia.

35. Say, S. M., and S. K. Sumer. 2011. Failure rate analysis of cereal combined drills. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (6): 1322-1329.

36. Shirmohammadi, A. 2002. Repair and maintenance planning. Arkane Danesh. Iran. 315p. (In Farsi).

37. Vafaee, M. R., H. Mashhadi Meighani, and A. Borgheei. 2008. Determination the mathematical model of repair and maintenance cost of New Holland TM155 and Valtra 8400 tractors in Markazi and Fars Provinces. Journal of New Finding in Agriculture 2 (2): 190-200. (In Farsi).

38. Vafaei, M. R., H. Mashadi Meighani, M. Almasi, and S. Minaei. 2010. Choosing of most appropriate method for reliability parameter calculation on cereal harvesting machine John deer 955 in Markazi province. Daneshe Novine Keshavarzi magazine, 5 (15): 143-151. (In Farsi).

39. Wireman, T. 2005. Developing performance indicators for managing Maintenance. Industrial Press, Inc., New York, NY.