Analysis of factors affecting the mechanical olive harvesting in Guilan province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H. Abedi ¹
• S. Firouzi ²
• M. S. Allahyari ¹

¹ Department of Agricultural Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

² Department of Agronomy, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v7i1.48003

Abstract

Introduction
Olive is one of the most valuable worldwide trees that produces useful products having high nutritional values. It is widely grown in many parts of world. The cost of olives hand picking is estimated to be about two-thirds of the total gross return of olive production. Therefore, various types of olive harvesting machineries were developed in the world.
Guilan Province of Iran is one of the leading regions for olives production in Iran. At the present time, almost all olives produced in Guilan province of Iran are manually harvested. Review of the reports showed that no research was performed to study the factors affecting the development of mechanized olive picking in Guilan Province, Iran. Due to the complexity of using the olive harvest machineries, identifying the factors affecting of their application is essential. Therefore, a Delphi study were conducted to identify and analysis the drivers and barriers for mechanized olive harvest in Guilan province, Iran.
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted using the Delphi technique in Guilan Province, Northern Iran. Delphi technique is a structured process to gather and classify the knowledge of a group of experts. Through consultation with professors and researchers in related institutions, 22 experts from the subsidiary offices of agricultural organization of Guilan Province were selected for the study. In the first round of the study, the participants were asked to answer to two open questions about the driving factors and barriers of mechanical olive harvest in Guilan Province. Nineteen items were found as driving factors and seventeen as barriers for developing the mechanical olive harvesting in Guilan Province. In the second phase of the study, the respondents were asked to answer to the all items written in the form of a five-level Likert scale, and finally, experts of panel were asked to answer to the top 10 items of driving factors and barriers in percent form. The results were analyzed using SPSS computer software and arranged in various tables.
Results and Discussion
Based on the findings of last phase of the Delphi study, ‘modification of olive groves and applying the technical fundamentals to the orchards’, agreed upon by 98.15% of the participants, was identified as the first driving priority to mechanize the olive harvest in Guilan Province. In this regard, pruning olive trees is the first modification practice which should be applied to the old olive groves of the region. Olive cultivar is the other parameter affecting on the performance of olive harvest machinery. Therefore, this parameter also must be considered in construction of new groves or renovate the old olive gardens.
‘Special support for related researches to construct and optimize the olive harvesting machinery’ was also as the second driving factor to develop mechanized olive harvesting in Guilan Province. In this regard, design and fabricate the new machinery based on the local conditions is a matter of great importance.
The findings of last phase of the Delphi study also indicated that ‘the slope of most olive growing plots’, agreed upon by 95.62% of the respondents was identified as the first barrier for mechanical olive harvesting in Guilan Province. Thus, research on all the technical aspects of hand-held harvesting machines, including hand-held shakers should take priority.
Lack or shortcoming of planning for the development of the olive harvest mechanization was also as the second barrier to develop mechanized olive harvesting in Guilan Province. Therefore, codifying a regional macro-plan to develop mechanized olive harvesting in Guilan Province must be considered among the important programs of Guilan’s Agricultural Organization, Iran.

Conclusion
The results of this study showed that many factors affect the mechanical harvesting of olives in Guilan province which modification of olive groves, special support for related researches to construct and optimize the olive harvesting machinery are among the most important driving factors. Therefore, to develop the mechanical olive harvester, developing the applied strategies to support the olive growers, modification of foreign machinery, and design and fabricate of new olives harvest machinery are essential in Guilan province, Iran.

Keywords

• Agricultural Mechanization
• Barriers
• Delphi
• Drivers
• Olives

20.1001.1.22286829.1396.7.1.5.0

References

1. Antognozzi, E., A. Cartechini, A. Tombesi, and A. Paliotti. 1990. La trasmissione della vibrazione e l’efficienza di raccolta in olivi della cv. Moraiolo. Genio Rurale, 5.

2. Asoegwu, S. N., and A. O. Asoegwu. 2007. An Overview of Agricultural Mechanization and Its Environmental Management in Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-Journal. Invited Overview 6 (9), pp, 22. Retrieved September 18, 2014.

3. Baladji, U., and M. Aghapour Sabbaghi. 2015. Investigating the reasons for non-acceptance of new machines by wheat growers in Andica County. Journal of Scientific Research and Development 2 (1): 62-66.

4. Catania, P., S. Piraino, M. Salvia, and M. Vallone. 2008. Influence of tree’s structure on the efficiency of the mechanical harvest of olives. International Conference of Innovation Technology to Empower Safety, Health and Welfare in Agriculture and Agro-food Systems, September 15-17, 2008 Ragusa – Italy.

5. Clarke, L. J., T. A. Morrison, J. Juricek, and B. Studenik. 1993. The Slovak Republic: Agricultural mechanization strategy, a review. Retrieved January 21, 2007.

6. Ghosh, B. K. 2010. Determinants of farm mechanization in modern agriculture: A case study of Burdwan districts of west Bengal. International Journal of Agricultural Research 5 (12): 1107-1115.

7. Famiani, F., D. Farinelli, and P. Proietti. 2004. Raccolta delle olive. Atti Aggiornamenti sulle Tecniche Colturali in Olivicoltura, Accademia Nazionale dell’Olivo e dell’Olio, Spoleto (PG), Italy: 123-162.

8. Ferguson, L. 2006. Trends in olive fruit handling previous to its industrial transformation. Grasas Y Aceites 57 (1): 9-15.

9. Ferguson, L., U. A. Rosa, S. Castro-Garcia, S.M. Lee, J.X. Guinard, J. Burns, W.H. Krueger, N.V. O’Connell, and K. Glozer. 2010. Mechanical harvesting of California table and oil olives. Advances in Horticultural Science 24 (1): 53-63.

10. Ghorbani, M. 2008. Factors affecting investment in agricultural machinery to farmers in Khorasan Razavi, application of the Heckman two-stage method. 5th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Mashhad, Iran, September 2008, pp, 9. (In Farsi).

11. Heiko A. 2012. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (8): 1525-1536.

12. Helmer, O. 1977. Problems in futures research: Delphi and causal cross-impact analysis, Futures, February 1977, pp, 17-31.

13. Hester, A. 2006. Olive growers “wrap up” and begin plans for 2006. Olive Growers Council Newsletter February 2006:1.

14. Hsu, C., and B. A. Sandford. 2007. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus Practical assessment. Research & Evaluation 12 (10): 1-8.

15. Kermani, A. M., and M. Pilehforoush. 2011. Evaluating the performance of olive harvesting machinery for oil cultivars. First Conference on Mechanization and Modern Technologies in Agriculture, February 2011, Khouzestan, Ahvaz, pp, 17. (In Farsi).

16. Ludwig, B. 1997. Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35 (5): 1-4. Retrieved November 6, 2005 from http://www.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.html

17. Mohammadi Torkashvand, A., M. S. Allahyari, and Z. Daghighi Masuleh. 2014. Identifying indicators of environmentally sustainable agriculture in paddy fields of Guilan province. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD) 4 (1): 73-79.

18. Olaoye, J. O., and A.O. Rotimi. 2010. Measurement of Agricultural Mechanization Index and Analysis of Agricultural Productivity of some Farm Settlements in South West, Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR E-journal 12 (1): 125-134. Retrieved from http://www.cigrjournal.org.

19. Ou, Y., D. Yang, P. Yu, Y. Wang, B. Li, and Y. Zhang. 2002. Experience and Analysis on Sugarcane Mechanization at a state farm in China. 2002 ASAE Annual International Meeting/ CIGR 15th World Congress Sponsored by ASAE CIGR, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Illinois, USA July 28-31.

20. Paschino, F., and R. Mura. 1997. Razionalizzazione della struttura della pianta di olivo per il miglioramento della resa di raccolta con scuotitrici da tronco. Atti del Convegno AIIA, Ancona.

21. Rezadoust, H. 2011. Factors affecting the failure of the tea industry in Guilan province. MSc thesis, Islamic Azad University, Abhar Branch, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural management, Abhar, Iran, p, 88. (In Farsi).

22. Shahbazi, I. 1989. Agriculture Advancement: The Requirements of Change and Renewal of Agriculture. [Translation.] Publication of Agriculture Dissemination Organization, Tehran, Iran. pp: 22-35. (In Farsi).

23. Shahraki, J., A. Shahrakizad, M. Yaghoubi, and M. Esfandiari. 2012. A Survey on the Level of Mechanization Development in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 8 (4): 2267-2271.

24. Tabatabaei, M. 1995. Olives and its oil. 4th Edition, published by the Fund of Development Studies of olive cultivation, pp, 286. (In Farsi).

25. Tombesi, A., M. Boco, M. Pili, and D. Farinelli. 2002. Influence of canopy density on efficiency of trunk shaker olive mechanical harvesting. Acta Horticulturae 586: 291-294.

26. Visco, T., M. Molfese, M. Cipolletti, R. Corradetti, and A. Tombesi. 2004 - Influence of training system, variety, and fruit ripening on efficiency of mechanical harvesting of young olive trees in Abruzzo, Italy. - Fifth International Symposium on Olive Growing, Izmir, Turkey, September 27-October 2 Abstract, CM 28.

27. Wissema, J. 1982. Trends in technology forecasting. R&D Management 12 (1): 27-36.

28. Witkin, B. R., and J. W. Altschuld. 1995. Planning and conducting needs assessment: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

29. Yousefi, Z. 2013. Assessment of different table olive harvesting methods. Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 3 (12): 1016-1020.

30. Yousefi, Z., F. Nayyeri, and M. Mohammad-Salehi. 2014. Harvesting two canned olive cultivars with tractor branch shaker. 8th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. Mashhad, Iran, January 2014, pp: 3542-3550. (In Farsi).

31. Zehtab Naebi, R., S. Firouzi, and M. R. Ebrahimzadeh. 2015. Promoters and deterrents of developing mechanization of peanut cultivation in north of Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD) 5 (1): 1-8.

32. Ziglio, E. 1996. The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi and its application to social policy and public health. London, England: Jessica Kingsley.