Mapping Alfalfa Yield Using an Energy Monitoring System on a Rectangular Hay Baler

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• H. Hooshmand
• M. Loghavi

Shiraz University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v5i1.28930

Abstract

The most advanced part of precision agriculture technology is yield monitoring of grain and non-grain crops. In this study, the horizontal pressing force of baling plunger and the angular position of the plunger connecting rod were simultaneously measured by installing a load cell and a shaft encoder on the connecting rod and plunger flywheel of a small rectangular baler, respectively. The signals of these sensors were processed in an electronic board and the output data were recorded on a portable computer for monitoring and further analysis. Before baling the harvested alfalfa from the test field, random samples were collected and weighted to obtain a referenced measure of the yield variation along the entire field. Comparing the yield data with the pressing energy and angular position data indicated a good correlation between the throughput rate of the baler and the horizontal force imparted on the baler plunger. The estimated crop yield variations were geo-referenced by using a GPS receiver. By combining the output data of the installed sensors and the positioning data, the yield map of the test field was prepared.

Keywords

• Alfalfa
• Hay baler
• Energy monitoring system
• Yield map

20.1001.1.22286829.1394.5.1.21.2

References

1. Ahmadi, I., M. Ghazavi, S. Minaei, and A. Borghei. 2010. Design, development and evaluation a semi- automated system for measuring the special positioning of hay alfalfa for baler machine. Iran Journal of Biosystem Engineering 41 (1): 11-16. (In Farsi).

2. Auerhammer, H., M. Demmel, T. Muhr, J. Rottmeier, and K. Wild. 1994. GPS for yield mapping on combines. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 11 (1): 53-68.

3. Borgelt, S. C., and K. A. Suddath. 1992. Grain flow for in field yield mapping. ASAE Paper No. 92-1022, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan.

4. Chaplin, J., N. Hemming, and B. Hetchler. 2003. Comparison of an impact plate and torque based yield sensors. ASAE Paper No. 0313034, ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan.

5. Holman, J. P. 1990. Experimental methods for engineers. 1st Edition, Translated by M. Maleki, and B. Dibainia, Academic Center of Education. Isfahan. (In Farsi).

6. Maguire, S. M., R. J. Godwin, M. J. O’Dogherty, and K. Blackburn. 2007. A dynamic weighing system for determining individual square bale weights during harvesting. Biosystems Engineering 98: 138-145.

7. Morgan, M., and D. Ess. 1997. The precision-farming guide for agriculturists. 1st Edition, Translated by M. Loghavi, Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Tehran, 295p. (In Farsi).

8. Perez-Munoz, F., and T. S. Colvin. 1996. Continuous grain yield monitoring. Transactions of the ASAE 39 (3): 775-783.

9. Sirvastava, A. K., G. E. Georing, and R. P. Rohrbach. 1993. Engineering principle of agricultural machines. ASAE, textbook No. 6, ASAE. 601p.

10. Vansichen, R., and J. De Baerdemaeker. 1991. Continuous wheat yield measurements on a combine. Automated Agriculture for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 1991 Symposium, St. Joseph. ASAE Publication, pp 346-355. Michigan.

11. Wild, K., and H. Auerhammer. 1999. A weighing system for local yield monitoring of forage crops in round balers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 23 (2): 119-132.