with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Agricultural Machinary Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Carrot is one of the most common vegetables used for human nutrition because of its high vitamin and fiber contents. Drying improves the product shelf life without addition of any chemical preservative and reduces both the size of package and the transport cost. Drying also aidsto reduce postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables especially, which can be as high as 70%. Dried carrots are used in dehydrated soups and in the form of powder in pastries and sauces. The main aim of drying agricultural products is decrease the moisture content to a level which allows safe storage over an extended period. Many fruits and vegetables can be sliced before drying.because of different tissue of a fruit or vegetable, cutting them in different direction and shape created different tissue slices. Due to drying is the exiting process of the moisture from internal tissue so different tissue slices caused different drying kinetics. Therefore, the study on effect of cutting parameters on drying is necessary.
Materials and Methods: Carrots (Daucus carota L.) were purchased from the local market (Kerman, Iran) and stored in a refrigerator at 5°C. The initial moisture contents of the Carrot samples were determined by the oven drying method. The sample was dried in an oven at 105±2°C about 24 hours. The carrots cut by 3 models blade at 3 directions. The samples were dried in an oven at 70°C. Moisture content of the carrot slices were determined by weighting of samples during drying. Volume changes because of sample shrinkage were measured by a water displacement method. Rehydration experiment was performed by immersing a weighted amount of dried samples into hot water 50 °C for 30 min.
In this study the effect of some cutting parameters was considered on carrot drying and the quality of final drying product. The tests were performed as a completely random design. The effects of carrot thickness at two levels (3 and 6 mm), blade in 3 models (flat blade, wavy blade and Ridged blade) and the cutting direction at 3 levels (linear, lateral and diagonal) were evaluated on drying kinetics, drying rate, shrinkage and rehydration. Statistic analysis done by SPSS software.
Results and Discussion: The results of analysis of variance showed that the effects of cutting parameters were significant on studied parameters (p<0.01) (Table 1). Thin layers dried faster than thick layers because of firmness of surface which it causes slow moisture transfer. The least drying time was 200 minutes at the samples that cut by a wavy blade at the lateral direction with a significant difference (p<0.05) given Fig.3. In these samples surface evaporation is more, because of more surface. The compare means showed drying rate at thick layer is fewer because of the longer distance moisture removal (Fig.6). Also the most drying rate was 0.74 gmin-1 at cutting by flat blade on linear direction with a significant difference (p<0.05).The least shrinkage was obtained on this treatment was 36.7% given Fig.8. The most of tissue of linear slices is woody part that is dense compare with other parts therefore shrinkage decrease at during drying. The most rehydration was 3.96 and 3.88 for cutting by flat blade in diagonal and linear direction with significant difference to other treatments. Rehydration depends on cell damage greatly. Since the slices of carrot that cut by flat blade were damaged fewer than other treatments therefore rehydration was more.
Conclusions: The drying behavior of carrot slices was studied at different methods in slicing carrot. The results showed a significant effect of the cutting variables on drying kinetics, drying rate, shrinkage and rehydration. The carrot moisture content decreases continuously over the drying and the fastest drying occurred at thin layers sliced by wavy blade. The slices that were cut by flat blade at linear direction caused the best quality. The results show cutting parameters are significant effect on quality of dried fruits and vegetable. There for the study of drying behavior is necessary for fruits with different tissue because of more quality of production and high efficiency at drying. Also the study of cutting parameter suggest on other fruits and vegetables with different tissue. The results help to manufactures for improvement of production of drying equipment.

Keywords

1. Abou ElHana, N. H. 2008. Microwave drying of apple. Process engineering 25 (3): 980-1003.
2. Aghbashlo, M., M. H. Kianmehr, A. Arabhosseini, and T. Nazghelichi. 2011. Modelling the carrot thin-layer drying in a semi-Industrial continuous band dryer. Czech J. Food Scienc 29 (5): 528-538.
3. Aguila, J., F. Fumi Sasaki, L. Heiffig, E. O. M. Ortega, A. P. Jacomino, and R. A. Kluge. 2006. Fresh-cut radish using different cut types and storage temperatures. Postharvest Biology and Technology 40 (2): 149-154.
4. Akbari, A., M. Shahedi, N. Hamdami, Sh. Dokhani, and M. Sadeghi. 2009. Kinetics moisture loss and quality comparison sliced tomatoes drying in three methods, solar drying the traditional solar drying and air drying. Natural Resources, Water and Soil Science 47 (2): 445-459. (In Farsi).
5. Barry-Ryan, C., and D. O'beirne. 2007. Quality and shelf-life of fresh cut carrot slices as affected by slicing method. Food Science 63 (5): 851-856.
6. Cui, Z. W., S. Y. Xu, and D.W. Sun. 2004. Microwave–vacuum drying kinetics of carrot slices. Food Engineering 65: 157-164.
7. Darvishi, H., M. H. Khoshtaghaza, and S. Minaei. 2014. Drying kinetics and colour change of lemon slices. International Agrophysics 28: 1-6.
8. Dehbure, R., and M. Esmaeili. 2009. The effect of the final drying process by microwave and hot air drying on parameters of dried grapes. Iranian Food Science and Industry Research 2: 108-122. (In Farsi).
9. Doymaz, I. 2004. Convective air drying characteristics of thin layer carrots. Journal of Food Engineering 61: 359-364.
10. Doymaz, I. 2007. Air drying characteristics of tomatoes. Food Engineering 78: 1291-1297.
11. Erenturk, S., and K. Erenturk. 2007. Comparison of genetic algorithm and neural network approaches for the drying process of carrot. Journal of Food Engineering 78: 905-912.
12. Eshraghi, E., Y. Maghsudlu, M. Kashani Nejad, Sh. Beyraghi, and M. Alami. 2012. Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on drying Kiwi layer. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal 7 (4): 273-279. (In Farsi).
13. Hui, Y. H. 2006. Hand book of food science technology and engineering 103: 13-14.
14. Izumi, H., A. E. Watada, and W. Douglas. 1996. Controlled atmosphere storage of carrot slices, sticks and shreds. Postharvest Biology and Technology 9: 165-172.
15. Lee, K. T., M. Farid, and S. K. Nguang. 2006. The mathematical modelling of the rehydration characteristics of fruit. Food Eng 72 (1): 16-23.
16. Mayor, L., and A. M. Sereno. 2004. Modelling shrinkage during convective drying of food materials: a review. J. Food Engineering 61: 373-386.
17. Maskan, M. 2001. Drying, shrinkage and rehydration characteristics of kiwifruits during hot air and microwave drying. Food Engineering 48: 177-182.
18. Minai, S., A. Motevaly, R. Hematian, S. Abasi, A. Ghadery, and Gh. H. Najafi. 2013. Track Changes of drying rate, moisture diffusion coefficient, activation energy and Consumption Energy of drying mushrooms by Microwave vacuum dryer. Food Science and Technology 41 (10): 1-12. (In Farsi).
19. Ozbek, B., and G. Dadali. 2007. Thin-layer drying characteristics and modeling of mint leaves undergoing microwave treatment. Journal of Food Engineering 83: 541-549.
20. Prakasha, S., S. K. Jhab, and N. Datta. 2004. Performance evaluation of blanched carrots dried by three different driers. Journal of Food Engineering 62: 305-313.
21. Priyadarshini, R., N. Shukla, and A. A. Mishra. 2013. Microwave drying characteristics of green peas and its quality evaluation. Agriculture and Food Science Technology 4 (5): 445-452.
22. Rasouli, M., and S. Seiiedlu. 2012. A study of the shrinkage changes and mathematical modeling of garlic (Allium sativum L.) during convective drying. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Engineering 2 (1): 67-73. (In Farsi).
23. Rezvani Moghadam, P., M. A. Behdani, M. Aghhavaniahajari, J. Falahi, and M. Nasiri Mahalati. 2011. Effects of harvesting and drying methods on the anthocyanins content of barberry fruit. First National Conference of barberry and jujube. (In Farsi).
24. Suwannarak, J., P. Phanumong, and N. Rattanapanone. 2014. Physiological changes of fruit and vegetable carving. Journal of Natural Sciences 13 (1): 77-86.
25. Tatsumi, Y., A. E. Watada, and W. P. Wergin. 1991. Scanning electron microscopy of carrot stick surface to determine cause of white ranslucent appearance. J. Food Sci. 56:1357-1359.
26. Toivonen, P. M. A., and D. A. Brummell. 2008. Biochemical bases of appearance and texture changes in fresh-cut fruit and vegetable. Postharvest Biology and Technology 48: 1-14.
27. Wong, J. Y. 2001. Theory of ground vehicles. (3rd ed). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
28. Zirjani, L., and H. Tavakolipour. 2010. The effect of different processes for drying of banana by microwave dryer. Innovation in Food Science and Technology 2 (1): 53-64. (In Farsi).
29. Zirjani, L., and H. Tavakolipour. 2010. The study of enables the production of banana layer by hot air drying method combines microwave. Iranian Food Science Research 6 (1): 58-67. (In Farsi).
CAPTCHA Image