with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

2 Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Global increase in the food demand and challenges regarding the water, energy and fertile soil has made it clear that current strategies are no longer efficient for maintaining food safety. Therefore, attention to novel, science-based, seasonal and climate-independent farming methods which could result in the higher crop quality and quantity is an inescapable decision. Among all agricultural practices and technologies, intensive culture and hydroponic methods in controlled environments play an important role.

Materials and Methods
To address these challenges, an indoor solar-powered auto-irrigate rotary cropping system (SARCS) was designed and implemented. Arrangement of plants in the surface area of an open-ended drum makes it possible to use space rather than area to maximize the acreage. An embedded fuzzy control system managed the irrigation process based on the plant water requirement predictions, and photovoltaic panels (PVs) was responsible for system electrical energy provision. The drum rotates around its horizontal axis where LED lamps are positioned to provide light to plants. This structure causes the plants gain the light illumination efficiently while getting access to water accumulated in the secondary tank positioned beneath the drum. Fertigation fuzzy control was based on plant evapotranspiration (ET) estimations with temperature, humidity, and light as its inputs. The instantaneous estimated ETs which were measures for root substrate moisture were summed until reaching its critical value which is equivalent to plant readily available water (RAW). This tends to trigger a pump submerged in a primary tank to fill the secondary one up to a predefined height ruled by a level sensor. The solar energy system consisted of PVs, MPPT, inverter, and battery bank. The SARCS evaluation procedure included two valid lettuce cultivation in grow bags filled with the same proportions of perlite and coco peat as a root substrate. The first cultivation used water level sensors to rule the irrigation process (non-fuzzy) while the second one (fuzzy) were governed by fertigation cycle fuzzy control.

Results and Discussion
The results showed that employing these two modes increased lettuce planting density to about 12 times in the field culture and 4 times in the greenhouse. The energy consumption evaluation revealed that in fuzzy and non-fuzzy approaches the same amounts of energy were needed. But in fuzzy mode the amount of energy consumed per kilogram of marketable lettuce was 74.33% less than in non-fuzzy mode. Fuzzy and non-fuzzy modes utilized 58.81% and 48.41% of the total energy requirements from PVs, respectively. It was calculated that the solar system is able to supply 51.16 % of SARCS total annual energy requirements in Karaj Province. The results of water consumption evaluations revealed that the fuzzy approach could cut the needed water to 24%, and improved the marketable product to 74.47%. For producing one kilogram dry and fresh biomass, fuzzy mode used 50.41% and 55.53% less water than non-fuzzy, respectively. Furthermore, one kilogram marketable product in fuzzy approach needed 56.46% less water than in non-fuzzy. The averaged water needed for growing one lettuce plant in non-fuzzy and fuzzy modes were 15 times less than in field lettuce. The comparison of growth parameters of harvested lettuce in the two studied approaches revealed that fuzzy mode would have significantly higher results in all parameters.

Conclusion
The results suggested that the development of intensive culture strategies would play an important role in the sustainable agricultural production and food safety. Also, the solar energy utilization in farming practices could save fossil resources and decrease air pollutions. Finally, purposeful irrigation approaches which are based on plant water requirement predictions can significantly reduce the total water consumption and improve products quality. This strategy, therefore can be introduced to other farming practices such as field and greenhouse methods.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Aghkhani, M. H., M. H. Abasspour-Fard, M. R. Bayati, H. Mortezapour, S. I. Saedi, and A. Moghimi. 2013. Performance analysis of a solar dryer equipped with a recycling air system and desiccant chamber. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 3 (2): 92-103. (In Farsi).
2. Alavian, S., M. Jahanshahi, and M. Tamanalu. 2012. Design of sugeno and mamdani fuzzy inference system for the estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration. Congress of electrical computer and information technology engineering. Mashhad, Iran. (In Farsi).
3. Alizadeh, A. 2011. Soil, Water and Plant Relationship. Emam Reza University Press. (In Farsi).
4. Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome 300: D05109.
5. Anonymous. 2015. Iran 1393 agricultural statistics. Ministry of Agriculture – Jahad. (In Farsi).
6. Chang, C. L., and K. P. Chang. 2014. The growth response of leaf lettuce at different stages to multiple wavelength-band light-emitting diode lighting. Scientia Horticulturae 179: 78-84.
7. Cobaner, M. 2011. Evapotranspiration estimation by two different neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Journal of Hydrology 398: 292-302.
8. Ed-Dahhak, A., M. Guerbaoui, Y. ElAfou, M. Outanoute, A. Lachhab, L. Belkoura, and B. Bouchikhi. 2013. Implementation of fuzzy controller to reduce water irrigation in greenhouse using LabView. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology Studies 1: 12-22.
9. Entesari, M., N. Heidari, J. Kheirabi, M. Alaei, A. Farshchi, and J. Vaziri. 2007. Water use efficiency in greenhouse production. Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (IRNCID). (In Farsi).
10. Hashemi Najafi, F., J. A. Palangi, and R. Azbarmi. 2007. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) using neuro-fuzzy networks (ANFIS). 9th National conference on irrigation and evaporation reduction. Kerman, Iran. (In Farsi).
11. Hassandokht, M. 2012. Greenhouse management (technology of greenhouse crops production). Selseleh pub. (In Farsi).
12. Hassandokht, M. 2012. Vegetables Production Technology. Selseleh pub. (In Farsi).
13. Kia, P. J., A. T. Far, M. Omid, R. Alimardani, and L. Naderloo. 2009. Intelligent control based fuzzy logic for automation of greenhouse irrigation system and evaluation in relation to conventional systems. World Applied Sciences Journal 1: 16-23.
14. Kişi, Ö. 2013. Applicability of Mamdani and Sugeno Fuzzy Genetic Approaches for Modeling Reference Evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 504 160-170.
15. Kişi, Ö., and Ö. Öztürk. 2007. Adaptive neurofuzzy computing technique for evapotranspiration estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 133: 368-379.
16. Marchildon, T. 2003. Rotary Plant Apparatus. United States of America.
17. Martha-Rocio, C., G. Juan-Luis, P. Oscar-Antonio, H. Monica-Karel, D. Rivas, and M. Erazo. 2015. Fuzzy system of irrigation applied to the growth of Habanero pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) under protected conditions in Yucatan, Mexico. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks.
18. Masterss, G. M. 2004. Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., publication.
19. Mazari-Menghabi, H. 2014. Quantification of physical properties of combined substrates using components properties and comparison of some greenhouse tomato transplant substrates. MS thesis. Tehran University.
20. Mirzaee, E., M. Omid, A. Keyhani, and P. Javadikia. 2013. Forecasting the Thermal Load for Implementing Solar Energy in a Model Poultry House. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Biotechnology 1: 30-36.
21. Moradi, H., H. Ansari, A. Alizadeh, S. Hasheminia, and M. Naderianfar. 2012. Modeling gross evapotranspiration under non-standard using fuzzy inference system Journal of water and soil (agricultural science and technology) 26: 507-494. (In Farsi).
22. Morewane, M. B. 2014. Effects of LED spectrum combinations on the absorption of mineral elements of hydroponic lettuce. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis 34: 1394-1397.
23. Mousazadeh, H., and S. Javanbakht. 2010. Photovoltaic. Iran agricultural science. (In Farsi).
24. Mousazadeh, H., A. Keyhani, A. Javadi, H. Mobli, K. Abrinia, and A. Sharifi. 2010. Optimal power and energy modeling and range evaluation of a solar assist plug-in hybrid electric tractor (SAPHT). Transactions of the ASABE 53: 1025-1035.
25. Peivast, G. 2009. Growing Vegetables. Danesh Pazir Publication.
26. Roustaee, A. 2009. Les cultures vegetables hors sol. Iranian Student Book Agency. (In Farsi).
27. Salih, J. M., and A. Adom, and A. M. Shaakaf. 2012. Solar Powered automated fertigation control system for cucumis melo L. cultivation in green house. APCBEE procedia 4: 79-87.
28. Shayannejad, M., and S. Saadati Nejad. 2007. Determining of evapotranspiration by using Fuzzy regression method. Journal of water resources researche 9: 1-9. (In Farsi).
29. Shimokawa, A., Y. Tonooka, M. Matsumoto, H. Ara, H. Suzuki, N. Yamauchi, and M. Shigyo. 2014. Effect of alternating red and blue light irradiation generated by light emitting diodes on the growth of leaf lettuce. bioRxiv: 003103.
30. Shiri, J., A. H. Nazemi, A. A. Sadraddini, G. Landeras, O. Kisi, A. F. Fard, and P. Marti. 2013. Global cross-station assessment of neuro-fuzzy models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration. Journal of hydrology 480: 46-57.
31. Teshneh Lab, M., N. Saffar Pour and D. Afyoni. 2013. A Course in Fuzzy Systems and Control. Tehran, Khajeh Nasir University of Technology. (In Farsi).
32. Wen, J., Q. Yang, L. Wei, R. Cheng, W. Liu, S. Bao, and W. Zhou. 2011. Influence of combined lighting with different red and blue LED on photosynthetic characteristics and quality of lettuce and evaluation of energy consumption. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 38: 761-769.
33. Yanagi, T., K. Okamoto, and S. Takita. 1996. Effects of blue, red, and blue/red lights of two different PPF levels on growth and morphogenesis of lettuce plants. Pages 117-122. International Symposium on Plant Production in Closed Ecosystems 440.
34. Yano, A., M. Onoe, and J. Nakata. 2014. Prototype semi-transparent photovoltaic modules for greenhouse roof applications. Biosystems Engineering 122: 62-73.
CAPTCHA Image