Use of Biospeckle Imaging to Measure Mechanical Properties of Apples in the Non-invasive Manner

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• O. Omidi-Arjenaki ¹
• D. Ghanbarian ¹
• M. Naderi-Boldaji ¹
• K. Mollazadeh ²

¹ Mechanical Engineering of Biosystem Department, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

² Department of Biosystem Engineering, University of Kordestan, Sanandaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v9i1.68953

Abstract

Introduction
The texture of fresh fruit is determined by the structural and mechanical properties of tissue. It depends on climate, maturity, variety and postharvest condition. During ripening, due to loss of turgor, degradation of starch and cell walls, the flesh of apple softens. The relationship between fruit quality and its physiological changes has been widely investigated. Using techniques according to the principles of force-deformation, impact, and vibration tests, texture of fruit and its mechanical properties can be associated, conventionally. In analyzing the vitality of biomaterials; a non-invasive technique based on the optical phenomenon is the Biospeckle method which occurs when the surface of the sample is illuminated by laser light. It seems that because of the fact that the laser light can penetrate tissue, it is possible to obtain information about the texture and cell condition from tissue under the skin. This means that, there would be a chance to detect and monitor the variation of cells and try to make a model to predict mechanical properties. Therefore, the overall objective of this study was to develop prediction models based on biospeckle imaging to predict mechanical properties of ripe Golden Delicious apples.
Materials and Methods
The 400 fresh and intact 'Golden Delicious' apples were harvested and were prepared for mechanical tests and biospeckle imaging. Biospeckle imaging was carried out first, followed by compression and creep test and then penetration test. During imaging, to avoid environmental reflections, the process was carried out in a dark and closed chamber. Biospeckle activity was saved as a video (AVI format) in a computer for analyzing. The THSP method was used to analyze biospeckle activity in samples. The indices which have been used for analyzing biospeckle images are divided into 3 statistical features and 4 textural features.
Apples were cut in half. One of the halves was used for cylindrical sample extraction for uniaxial compression and creep tests and another was used for penetration test. From compression tests the tangent modulus of elasticity, stress and strain of bio-yield and failure energy for toughness calculation were determined. The creep behavior was obtained by fitting the Burger's model to the experimental data. In penetration test, a stainless steel probe with a hemispherical tip was used for peeled and unpeeled samples. For each sample maximum penetration force and energy were obtained.
Prediction of mechanical property was carried out using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). To reduce the dimension of the input vector the PCA was used. Four significant adjustments were made in the structure of ANFIS in order to find the best models. The models were evaluated using RMSECV, RMSEP, MBEC, MBEP, RC, and RP.
 
Results and Discussion
Models for modulus of elasticity prediction have Rp=0.821, 0778, 0.791, 0.880, and 0.843 for 4 compression rate and secant modulus, respectively. Clearly, the results from this research are encouraging, indicating the potential of using speckle imaging system for predicting apple fruit mechanical properties. Comparing to the all texture analysis techniques, Wavelet and GLRLM provided good results for most properties leading to select them as the best techniques for analysis of biospeckle images because of their consistency in prediction performance. Prediction model for break strain has the highest Rp (Rp=0.920) followed by the retarded time (Rp=0.890), retarded viscosity (Rp=0.886) and maximum penetration force in unpeeled case (Rp=0.883). A lower correlation (Rp = 0.728) was observed for initial viscosity.
Conclusion
The described optical method based on biospeckle represents an innovative and reliable method for rapid and non-invasive detection of mechanical properties. The results of the evaluation showed that, as time passes, fresh apples due to the loss of water in both the elasticity and the biospeckle activity were dropped. Biospeckle imaging can accurately predict mechanical properties. The average accuracy of best prediction of mechanical properties models was R²=0.899. The present results can provide the basis of future development of in-line quality monitoring during apple quality control.

Keywords

• Creep test
• Laser imaging
• Penetration test
• Prediction
• Uniaxial compression test

20.1001.1.22286829.1398.9.1.6.5

References

1. Adamiak, A., A. Zdunek, A. Kurenda, and K. Rutkowski. 2012. Application of the Biospeckle Method for Monitoring Bull’s Eye Rot Development and Quality Changes of Apples Subjected to Various Storage Methods-Preliminary Studies. Sensors 12: 3215-3227.

2. Alamar, M. C., E. Vanstreels, M. L. Oey, E. Molto, and B. M. Nicolaı. 2008. Micromechanical behaviour of apple tissue in tensile and compression tests: Storage conditions and cultivar effect. Journal of Food Engineering 86: 324-333.

3. Ansari, M. D., and A. K. Nirala. 2013. Biospeckle activity measurement of Indian fruits using the methods of cross-correlation and inertia moments. Optik 124: 2180-2186.

4. Arefi, A., P. A. Moghaddam, A. Hassanpour, K. Mollazade, and A. M. Motlagh. 2016. Non-destructive identification of mealy apples using biospeckle imaging. Postharvest Biology and Technology 112: 266-276.

5. Arizaga, R. 2009. Methods of dynamic speckle analysis statistical analysis. PP 65-114 in J. K. Rabal and B. Jr. eds. Dynamic Laser Speckle and Applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

6. Arizaga, R., M. Trivi, and H. Rabal. 1999. Speckle time evolution characterization by the co-occurrence matrix analysis. Optics and Laser Technology 31: 163-169.

7. Braga, R. A., G. F. Rabelo, L. R. Granato, E. F. Santos, J. C. Machado, R. Arizaga, H. J. Rabal, and M. Trivi. 2005. Detection of fungi in beans by the laser biospeckle technique. Biosystem Engineering 91: 465-469.

8. Cena, H., R. Lub, F. Mendozab, and R. M. Beaudryc. 2013. Relationship of the optical absorption and scattering properties with mechanical and structural properties of apple tissue. Postharvest Biology and Technology 85: 30-38.

9. Cho, Y. 1999. Firmness parameters for evaluation of apple freshness. KSAM 1999 Winter Conferences. Korean SOC. Agr. Machinery, Suwon, Korea.

10. Cho, Y., Y. J. Han, and J. Lee. 1997. Feasibility of laser vision for evaluating fruit quality. Food Engineering Progress 1: 137- 142.

11. Choudhary, R., J. Paliwal, and D. S. Jayas. 2008. Classification of cereal grains using wavelet, morphological, colour, and textural features of non-touching kernel images. Biosystem Engineering 99: 330-337.

12. Clausi, D. A. 2002. An analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of grey level quantization. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 28: 45-62.

13. Holt, J. E., and D. Schoorl. 1984. Mechanical Properties and Texture of Stored Apples. Journal of Texture Studies 15: 377-394.

14. Jamshidi B., A. Arefi, S. Minaie. 2017. Non-destructive prediction of apple firmness during storage based on dynamic speckle patterns. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 1: 140-151. (In Farsi).

15. Lafuente, V., J. Val, C. Urzola, and I. Negueruela. 2013. Determination of quality parameters in apple ‘Smoothee Golden Delicious’ using backscattering laser imaging. in M.F.P.C.M. Costa eds. 8th Iberoamerican Optics Meeting and 11th Latin American Meeting on Optics, Lasers, and Applications. SPIE Proceedings, University of Porto, Faculty of Sciences, Porto, Portugal.

16. Lu, R. 2004. Multispectral imaging for predicting firmness and soluble solids content of apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 31: 147-157.

17. Lu, R. 2007. Nondestructive measurement of firmness and soluble solids content for apple fruit using hyperspectral scattering images. Sensing and Instrumentation for Food Quality and Safety 1: 19-27.

18. Masoudi, H., A. Tabatabaeefar, and A. M. Borghaee. 2007. Determination of storage effect on mechanical properties of apples using the uniaxial compression test. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 49: 3.29-23.33.

19. Mendoza, F., R. Lu, and H. Cen. 2012. Comparison and fusion of four nondestructive sensors for predicting apple fruit firmness and soluble solids content. Postharvest Biology and Technology 73: 89-98.

20. Mollazade, K., M. Omid, F. A. Tab, Y. P. Kalaj, S. S. Mohtasebi, and M. Zude. 2013. Analysis of texture-based features for predicting mechanical properties of horticultural products by laser light backscattering imaging. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 98: 34-45.

21. Ojala, T., M. Pietikäinen, and T. Mäenpää. 2002. Multiresolution grey-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24: 971-987.

22. Peng, Y., and R. Lu. 2005. Modeling multispectral scattering profiles for prediction of apple fruit firmness. Transactions of the ASAE 48 (1): 235-242.

23. Peng, Y., and R. Lu. 2006. Improving apple fruit firmness predictions by effective correction of multispectral scattering images. Postharvest Biology and Technology 41: 266-274.

24. Qing, Z., B. Ji, and M. Zude. 2007. Predicting soluble solid content and firmness in apple fruit by means of laser light backscattering image analysis. Journal of Food Engineering 82: 58-67.

25. Rahemi, M. 2005. Postharvest physiology: an introduction to physiology and handling of fruits, vegetables and ornamental plants. Shiraz University Publication, Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi).

26. Szymanska-Chargot, M., A. Adamiak, and A. Zdunek. 2012. Pre-harvest monitoring of apple fruits development with the use of the biospeckle method. Scientia Horticulturae 145: 23-28.

27. Tscheuschner, H. D., and D. Du. 1988. Modelling of Mechanical Properties of Apple Flesh under Compressive Load. Journal of Food Engineering 8: 173-186.

28. Varela, P., A. Salvador, and S. Fiszman. 2007. Changes in apple tissue with storage time: Rheological, textural and microstructural analyses. Journal of Food Engineering 78: 622-629.

29. Yang, J. L., Z. Zhang, A. K. Schlarb, and K. Friedrich. 2006. On the characterization of tensile creep resistance of polyamide 66 nanocomposites. Part II: modeling and prediction of long-term performance. Polymer 47: 6745-6758.

30. Zdunek, A., A. Adamiak, P. M. Pieczywek, and A. Kurenda. 2014. The biospeckle method for the investigation of agricultural crops: a review. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 52: 276-285.

31. Zdunek, A., and J. Cybulska. 2011. Relation of biospeckle activity with quality attributes of apples. Sensors 11: 6317-6327.

32. Zhao, Y., J. Wang, X. Wu, F. W. Williams, and R. J. Schmidt. 1997. Point-wise and whole-field laser speckle intensity fluctuation measurements applied to botanical specimens. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 28: 443-456.