Document Type : Research Article
Authors
1 Mechanic of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Soil Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Introduction
Presently, the loss of ground water levels and the increase in dissolved salts have given importance to the determination of salinity and the management of their variations in irrigated farms. Soil electrical conductivity is an indirect method to measure soil salts. The direct electrode contact method (Wenner method) is one of the widely used methods to rapidly measure soil ECa in farms. However, soil scientists prefer soil actual electrical conductivity (saturated extract electrical conductivity) (ECe) as an indicator of soil salinity, though its measurement is only possible in the laboratory. The aim of this study was to find a relationship between the prediction of soil actual electrical conductivity (ECe) in terms of temperature, moisture, bulk density and apparent electrical conductivity of soil (ECa). Thereby, the estimation of ECe would allow the partial calculation of ECa that is dependent upon soil salinity and dissolved salts.
Materials and Methods
This study used RBF neural network in Box-Behnken statistical design to explore the impacts of effective parameters on direct contact method in the measurement of soil ECa and provided a model to estimate ECe from ECa, temperature, moisture content and bulk density. In this study soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) was measured by direct contact (Wenner) method. The present study considered four most effective factors: ECa (saturated paste extract EC), moisture, bulk density, and temperature (Baradaran Motie et al., 2010). Given the characteristics of farming soils in Khorasan Razavi Province (Iran), the maximum and minimum of each independent variable were assumed as 0.5-6 mS.cm-1 for ECe, 5-25% for moisture content, 1-1.8 g.cm-3 for bulk density, and 2-37°C for soil temperature. Considering the experimental design, three moisture levels (5, 15 and 25%), three salinity levels (0.5, 3.25 and 6 mS.cm-1), three temperature levels (2, 19 and 37°C) and three compaction levels with bulk densities of 1, 1.4 and 1.8 g.cm-3 were assumed in 27 trials with predetermined arrangement on the basis of Box-Behnken technique. 13 common algorithms were explored in MATLAB software package for the training of the artificial neural network in order to find the optimum algorithm (Table 4). The input layer of the network designed by integrating a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with k-fold cross-validation. Using k-fold cross-validation, 20 different datasets were generated for training and validation of RBF neural network.
Results and Discussion
A combination of an RCBD and k-fold cross-validation was used. The results of both training and validation phases should be considered in the selection of training algorithm. In addition, R2 of T1 training algorithm had a much lower standard deviation than other training algorithms. The lower standard deviation is, the more capable the algorithm would be in learning from different datasets. Considering all aspects, trainbr (T2) training algorithm was found to have the best performance among all 13 training algorithms of the neural network. Table 7 tabulates the results of means comparison for R2 of RBF model for both training and validation phases resulted from the application of some combinations of S and L2 factors as interaction. As can be observed, R2 = 0.99 for all of them with no significant difference. However, the magnitude of order differed between training and validation phases. Given the importance of the training phase, L2=9 and S=0.1 were regarded as the optimum values.
The sensitivity analysis of the network revealed that soil ECa, moisture, bulk density, and temperature had the highest to lowest impact on the estimation of soil ECe, respectively. This model can improve the precision of soil ECa measurement systems in the estimation and preparation of soil salinity maps. Furthermore, this model can save in time of data analysing and soil EC mapping because it does not need data recollection for the calibration of systems. A validation prose was done with a 60 field collected data set. The results of validation show R2=0.986 between predicted and measured ECa.
Conclusion
The present research focused on improving the precision of soil ECe measurement on the basis of easily accessible parameters (ECa, temperature, moisture, and bulk density). In conventional methods of soil EC mapping, the systems only measure soil ECa and then calibrate it to ECe by collecting some samples and using statistical methods. In this study, Soil ECe was estimated with R2 = 0.99 by a multivariate artificial neural network model with the inputs, including ECa, temperature, moisture, and bulk density of soil without any need to collect further soil samples and calibration process. The Bayesian training algorithm was introduced as the best training algorithm for this neural network. Thereby, soil EC variation maps can be prepared with higher precision to estimate the spatial spread of salinity in farms. Also, the results imply that soil ECa, moisture, bulk density and temperature have the highest to lowest effectiveness on the estimation of soil ECe, respectively.
Keywords
Main Subjects
)
Send comment about this article