with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article-en

Authors

Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The eggshell of birds, as a natural shield and package, protects the tissues inside it from microbial and mechanical damages. Proper intake of calcium, as an important and effective factor in increasing the strength and quality of the eggshell, could reduce complications. In this paper, the effect of dietary calcium at five different levels on engineering features of Japanese quail eggs in a in their first laying period was investigated. The values for an average of mass, volume, specific mass, shell thickness, major diameter, central diameter and rupture force along the longitudinal and transverse axes were measured. Rupture energy or toughness, slope of the rupture curve (hardness), deformation along the longitudinal and transverse axis to the point of rupture as well as longitudinal and transverse deformation of 450 tested quail eggs (3 period of time, 5 treatment of calcium, 5 replication, 6 observation) were measured. The characters of the specific mass, shell thickness, rupture force, and slope of the rupture curve of quail eggs indicate the strength of quail egg. In this study, variations in all parameters indicating shell strength at different levels of dietary calcium were consistent with each other. Five different treatments with 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%, and 3.5% calcium content were supplied for the study. By increasing the calcium content of the quail diet from 1.5 to 3 wt%, the volume and weight of quail eggs dropped and shell thickness was reinforced. According to the results, the shell strength of quail eggs along the transverse axis was slightly less than the longitudinal axis, but the flexibility and energy required for quail egg rupture were much greater across the longitudinal axis.

Keywords

Open Access

©2020 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

1. Alahdadi, I., H. Oraki, and F. ParhizkarKhajani. 2012. Grain Physical Properties of Some Sunflower Cultivars Influenced by Water Deficit Stress. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Engineering 2 (1): 58-66. (In Farsi).
2. Altuntas, E., and A. Sekeroglu. 2008. Effect of egg shape index on mechanical properties of chicken eggs. Journal of Food Engineering 85: 606-612.
3. Ancel, A., and H. Girard. 1992. Eggshell of the domestic guinea fowl. British poultry science 33: 993-1001.
4. Baghani, M., and M. H. Aghkhani. 2016. Effects of Divergent Selection Body Weight and the Quail Laying Eggs on some Physical and Mechanical Properties of Japanese quail Eggs. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research 8 (1): 216-226. (In Farsi).
5. Buchar, J., S. Nedomova, J. Trnka, and J. Strnkova. 2015. Behaviour of Japanese quail Eggs under Mechanical Compression. International Journal of Food Properties 18: 1110-1118.
6. Corrêa P. C., G. H. H. Oliveira, P. L. Rodrigues, S. C. Campos, and F. M. Botelho. 2010. Hygroscopic equilibrium and physical properties evaluation affected by parchment presence of coffee grain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 694-702.
7. Gonzalez, M. 1995. Influence of age on physical traits of Japanese quail (Coturnixcoturnix japonica) eggs. Ann Zootech 44: 307-312.
8. Jiang, S., C. Luying, S. Cheng, K. Xiao, L. Jingwen, and H. 2013. Jiafa. Effects of dietary energy and calcium levels on performance, egg shell quality and bone metabolism in hens. The Veterinary Journal 198: 252-258.
9. Ketelaere B., T. Govaerts, P. Coucke, E. Dewil, J. Visscher, E. Decuypere, and J. De Baerdemaeker. 2002. Measuring the eggshell strength of 6 different genetic strains of laying hens: Techniques and comparisons. British Poultry Science 43: 238-244.
10. Ketta, M., and E. Tumova. 2016. Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review. Czech Journal of Animal Science 7: 299-309.
11. Ketta, M., and E. Tumova. 2018. Relationship between eggshell thickness and other eggshell measurements in eggs from litter and cages. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17 (1): 234-239.
12. Mazzuco, H., and P. Y. Hester. 2005. The effect of an induced molt and a second cycle of lay on skeletal integrity of White Leghorns. Poultry Science 84: 771-781.
13. Mohsenin N. N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Second edition. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. New York, USA.
14. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th ed. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences.
15. Nedomova, S., V. Kumbar, J. Trnka, and J. Buchar. 2016. Effect of the loading rate on compressive properties of goose eggs. Journal of Biological Physics.42: 223-233.
16. North M. O. 1984. Commercial production manual, Third Edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
17. Polat, R., S. Tarhan, M. Cetin, and U. Atay. 2007. Mechanical behavior under compression loading and some physical parameters of Japanese quail (Coturnixcoturnix japonica) eggs. Czech Journal of Animal Science 52 (2): 50-56.
18. Robert, J. R., and M. Ball. 1998. Egg shell quality problems: causes and solutions. University of Newengland. Armidals, New south Wales, Australia, 2351.
19. Rohani, A., S. I. Saedi, H. Gerailue, and M. H. Aghkhani. 2015. Prediction of lateral surface, volume and sphericity of pomegranate using MLP artificial neural network. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5 (2): 292-301. (In Farsi).
20. Roque, L., and M. C. 1994. Soares. Effects of eggshell quality and broiler breeder age on hatchability. Poultry Science 73: 1938-1845.
21. Velayati, E., B. Emadi, M. Khojastehpour, and M. H. Saidirad. The Effect of Moisture Content on Physical Properties of Berberis 1 (1): 1-9.
22. Yannakopoulos, A. L., and A. S. Tserveni-Goussi. 1986. Quality characteristics of quail eggs. British Poultry Science 27: 171-176.
CAPTCHA Image