Evaluation of a Chickpea Harvesting Header with Perforated Plate

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• A. Niazi ¹
• H. Golpira ²
• H. Samimi Akhijahani ²

¹ Graduate student of Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

² Department of Biosystem Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2021.69403.1028

Abstract

Introduction
One of the biggest problems in growing legumes like peas is harvesting these types of crops. During the machine harvesting process the harvest loss is very high. Therefore, in most parts of Iran chickpea harvested by hand and this is very tedious. Based on the literature review there are different types of harvesting machines which designed, constructed and optimized by Miller et al., 1990; Golpira, 2015; Shahbazi, 2011; Jalali and Abdi, 2014; Mahamodi, 2016. But using different varieties of chickpea in mountainous areas has limited the use of harvesting mechanisms. The purpose of this study is mechanization of the harvesting process of chickpea with low losses and suitable performance. Moreover the optimization process of lowering the weight of the header was carried out by modeling of software.
Materials and Methods
To reduce the amount of chickpea losses from the reel, a perforated plate with defined holes was installed in the header, where the separated chickpea pods fell behind the plate without returning to the farm. By using the plate in the header of the chickpea harvesting machine and by changing the harvesting height at the three levels of 10, 15 and 20 cm and the distance of the cutter at three levels of 3, 5 and 7 mm, the performance of the machine was evaluated. The experiments were carried out with Caboli variety cultivated in Kurdistan province, which is proper for mountainous areas without regular watering condition in three replications. The plants were placed in a fiber, wooden plate considering farm conditions. In addition, the header was modeled statically and dynamically under the influence of the external forces applied to the header using Ansys and Abaqus software. Based on the actual data, the validity of the applied model was determined and according to the verification results the optimization of the header was performed considering minimal weight (to reduce energy consumption).
Results and Discussion
The evaluation results of the performance of header showed that the effects of using perforated plate and the height of the header for harvesting on the chickpea harvesting and losses are significant at the level of 1% and 5%, respectively, and the interaction between perforated plate and the header height on the chickpea loss is significant at 5%. Using a perforated plate in the harvesting machine increases the amounts of chickpea collected from the farm increases. In this condition the chickpea pods separated from the plant and passed through the plate. With the separation of the stems, due to the proper wear that exists between the plate and the reel, the pods are properly separated and pass through the perforated plate. Moreover, the chickpea loss is higher for the system without perforated plate. The effect of the distance between the reel and header plate is affects the remaining chickpea on the plate. By increasing the distance from 5 mm to 7 mm the amount of harvested had a considerable effect. The best method of harvesting chickpeas is at the kinematic index of 1.5 with perforated plate, the harvesting height of 15 cm and the distance of 5 mm. According to modeling processes of the reel and the results of the static analysis, the minimum and maximum stress values were recorded about 3.31 MPa and 6.50 MPa (based on the von misses criteria), respectively, which is very small compared to the yield stress of the reel constructed with St-37. Also, the results of the dynamic analysis of the reel showed that the maximum von misses stress occurred with increasing the kinematic index. The maximum stress for kinematic index of 1, 1.5 and 2 was observed about 32.2, 40.1 and 52.72 MPa, respectively. The results of 3D model validation showed that the applied model with Abaqus software (R²>0.9264) was able to predict the amount of stress in different parts of the reel.
Conclusion
In this study, the changes were made on the chickpea harvesting machine to get the proper performance and increasing machine efficiency. A perforated plate was used to prevent pea’s losses. The best condition for the harvesting process is obtained with the harvesting height of 15 cm and the distance of 5 mm. By using 3D modeling of the reel weight was reduced about 10%.

Keywords

• Loss
• Modeling
• Optimization
• Perforated plate
• Stress

20.1001.1.22286829.1401.12.4.3.9

Main Subjects

• Modeling

Open Access

©2021 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Anjum, N. A. (2016). Book Review: Legumes under environmental stress: yield, Improvement and adaptations. Frontiers in Plant Science. Wiley and Sons.
2. Baruah, D. C., & Panesar, B. S. (2005). Energy requirement model for a combine harvester, part I: Development of component models. Biosystems Engineering, 90(1), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.08.017
3. Behroozi-Lar, M., & Huang, B. K. (2002). Design and development of chickpea combine. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America, 33(1): 35-38.
4. Dehghan-Hesar, H., & Kalantari, D. (2019). Design and Evaluation of Two New Biomimetic Blades for Reducing the Shear Energy Required for Cutting Herbal Plants. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 9(2), 265-278. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v9i2.69843
5. Ebrahimi-Nik, M. A., Khademolhosseini, N., Abbaspour-Fard, M. H., Mahdini, A., & Alami-Saied, K. (2009). Optimum utilisation of low-capacity combine harvesters in high-yielding wheat farms using multi-criteria decision making. Biosystems Engineering, 103(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.04.009
6. Golpira, H., Tavakoli, T., Khoshtaghaza, M. H., & Minaei, S. (2009). Mechanical properties of chickpea to design of harvesting machines. Agricultural Science, 19 (2), 23-31.
7. Golpira, H., Tavakoli, T., & Baerdemaeker, J. D. (2013). Design and development of a chickpea stripper harvester. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(4), 929-934. http://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013114-3393
8. Golpira, H. (2015). Redesign and evaluation of chickpea harvester. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 40(2), 102-109.
9. Golpira, H., & Golpira, H. (2017). Soft simulator for redesigning of a chickpea harvester header. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 135: 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.018
10. Griffin, G. A. (1973). Fundamentals of machine operation: combine harvesting. John Deere Service Publications.
11. Guler, M., Sait-Adak, M., & Ulkan, H. (2001). Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea. European Journal of Agronomy, 14(2), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00086-1
12. Hanna, H. M., & Quick, G. R. (2007). Grain harvesting machinery design. Handbook of farm, dairy and food machinery (Kutz M, edn). William Andrew Inc, Delmar, NY: 93-111.
13. Hirai, Y., Inoue, E., & Mori, K. (2004). Application of a quasi-static stalk bending analysis to the dynamic response of rice and wheat stalks gathered by a combine harvester reel. Biosystems Engineering, 88(3), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.04.010
14. Jalali, A., & Abdi, R. (2014). The effect of ground speed, reel rotational speed and reel height in harvester losses. Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability, 5(2), 221-231.
15. Konak, M., Carman, K., & Aydin, C. (2002). Physical properties of chickpea seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 82(1), 73- https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2002.0053
16. Li, M., Chen, D., Zhang, S., & Tong, J. (2013). Biomimeitc design of a stubble-cutting disc using Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 10(1): 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(13)60206-1
17. Mahmoudi, K. (2016). Design, development and evaluation of a chickpea stripper header. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Snanadaj, Iran. (in Persian).
18. Mansori-Rad, D. (2006). Tractors and agricultural machinery (Volume II). Bu-Ali Sina University Press.
19. Mardani, K. (2016). Design, manufacturing and evaluation of a chickpea harvesting machine. Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. (in Persian).
20. Miller, M. D., Wright, M. E., Mailander, M. P., & Beard, J. (1990). A two-link harvester reel. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 6(2), 131-137.
21. Modares Motlagh, A., Rostampour, V., & Mardani, K. (2018). Design, fabrication and evaluation of a short-legged chickpea harvest machine. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 49, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.236196.664962
22. Razavi, S. M. A., Zaerzadeh, E., Khafaji, N., & Pahlevani, M. (2010). Some physical properties of seeds and splits of Desi chickpea (Kaka var). Iran Journal Pulses Research, 1(1): 77-83. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijpr.v1i1.6357
23. Samineni, S., Siddique, K. H. M., Gaur, P. M., & Colmer, T. D. (2011). Salt sensitivity of the vegetative and reproductive stages in chickpea (Cicer arietinum): Podding is a particularly sensitive stage. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71(2), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.12.014
24. Shahbazi, F. (2011). Impact damage to chickpea seeds as affected moisture content and impact velocity. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27(5), 771-775. http://doi.org/10.13031/2013.39557
25. Shigley, J. E. (2011). Shigley's mechanical engineering design. McGraw-Hill.
26. Sidahmed, M., & Jaber, N. (2004). The design and testing of a cutter and feeder mechanism for the mechanical harvesting of lentils. Biosystems Engineering, 88, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.04.002
27. Singh, U., Gaur, P., Singh, G., & Chaturvedi, S. J. F. M. F. P. (2018). Mechanical Harvesting of Chickpea: Agronomic Interventions. 196.
28. Srivastava, A. K., Goering, C. E., Rohrbach, R. P., & Buckmaster, D. R. (2006). Engineering principles of agricultural machines. Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machinery, 3, 325-402. https://doi.org/10.13031/epam.2013
29. Tieppo, R. C., Romanelli, T. L., Milan, M., Sorensen, C. A. G., & Bochtis, D. (2019). Modeling cost and energy demand in agricultural machinery fleets for soybean and maize cultivated using a no-tillage system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 156, 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.032
30. Zandiyeh, S. 2016. Design, development and evaluation of an automatic system to control the reel speed of the grain combine harvester. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Snanadaj, Iran. (in Persian).
31. Zareei, S., & Abdollahpour, Sh. (2016). Modeling the optimal factors affecting combine harvester header losses. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 18(2), 60-65.
32. Zobeiri, M., Rostampour, V., Rezvanivand Fanaei, A., & Nikbakht, A. M. (2020). Experimental and numerical investigation of deviation blade effect on sedimentation chamber performance in chickpea harvesting machine. Iranian Biosystems Engineering, 51, 329-339. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2020.276317.665166