Comparison of Dry Land Wheat Grain Harvest Losses in Different Types of Chaff Collector Combine Harvesters in Kurdistan Province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M. Safari ¹
• M. A. Rostami ²

¹ Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

² Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Resource Research and Education Center (AREEO), Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2022.75175.1091

Abstract

Introduction
In conventional combine harvesters, wheat chaff is typically removed from the end of the machine and deposited on the field surface. Depending on the wheat cultivar, cultivation method, and growing conditions, the amount of chaff produced can range from 0.8 to 1.5 times the amount of grain harvested per hectare (Tavakoli, 2012). On average, this translates to an annual production of approximately 14 million tons of chaff, which is valued at around $240000000 based on regional prices in 2018-2019 ($1000 per kilogram). If collected, these chaff residues could be used as animal feed for livestock. Additionally, the long stems protruding from the back of conventional combine harvesters can interfere with subsequent cultivation efforts. Chaff combine harvesters have a similar structure to conventional machines, but feature a modified end that includes a tank and blower for collecting and depositing crushed chaff. Apart from the threshing unit, all other components of the harvester remain unchanged.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in 2019 in dryland wheat fields to determine the performance of Chaff combine harvesters in Kurdistan province. The study used 15 combine harvesters, including John Deere models equipped with chaff threshers from Shiraz, Bookan, and Hamedan, as well as the Hamedan Barzegar specific chaff collector combine. These combines were evaluated and compared based on natural losses, head and chaff storage losses, field capacity, purity percentage, and yield in field conditions in Kurdistan province. The total number of combines evaluated was 15, using a completely randomized design. Among these, 33% belonged to Shiraz company (5 samples), 33% to Bookan (5 samples), 20% to Hamedan (3 samples), and 14% to Hamedan Barzegar (2 samples). Sampling included measurement of natural losses, header losses, threshing tank losses (losses of the threshing unit, separating unit, and cleaning unit), and quality losses (broken grains and impurities) in the combine tank.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the average yield, natural loss, and combine loss were 1,698.14 kg.ha^-1, 2.39%, and 4.92%, respectively. In terms of the loss rates in different parts of the combine, 43.49% was related to the chaff storage of the combine, and 56.50% was related to the combine head.
The natural loss rate in this province was 2.39%. The total combine loss was 5.18%, with 40.44% of that related to chaff storage and the rest related to the combine head. The results also showed a significant difference between the treatments in terms of field capacity, chaff storage loss, and purity percentage at a probability level of 5%.
The total loss of the Hamedan Barzegar combine was 6.67%, which was higher than the other combines. The chaff storage loss of the Shiraz, Bookan, Hamedan, and Hamedan Barzegar combines were 0.87%, 2.64%, 0.78%, and 4.28%, respectively, showing a significant difference at a 5% level. There was also a significant difference between the treatments in terms of total grain loss.
Based on these results, it is recommended to use the Hamedan, Bookan, Shiraz, and Hamedan Barzegar combines, with total losses of 4.33%, 4.33%, 4.52%, and 6.56%, respectively.
Conclusion
The average purity of harvested grains was 96.62%, and there was no significant difference between the combine harvesters in this regard.
There was a significant difference between the combines in terms of field capacity at a probability level of 5%. The field capacity of the Bookan, Hamedan Barzegar, Hamedan, and Shiraz combine harvesters were 0.83, 0.87, 0.83, and 0.73 hectares per hour, respectively.
In Kurdistan province, the average grain combine loss in dryland wheat harvesting with chaff combine harvesters was 4.92%, which is higher than in other provinces.
The loss in the chaff tank of the Shiraz, Bookan, Hamedan, and Hamedan Barzegar combine harvesters was 0.87%, 2.64%, 0.78%, and 4.28%, respectively. Regardless of head losses, the loss in the Hamedan combine was less than other combine harvesters.
The total losses of the Hamedan Barzegar, Bookan, Shiraz, and Hamedan combine harvesters were 6.56%, 4.32%, 4.52%, and 4.30%, respectively, with the Hamedan Barzegar and Hamedan combine harvesters having the highest and lowest losses, respectively.
Based on the results obtained from this study, using the Hamedan combine is recommended in the dryland conditions of Kurdistan due to its low losses, high purity, and field capacity.
Acknowledgement
Thanks to the Agricultural Jihad Organization of Kurdistan Province, specifically the deputy of the Plant Production and Mechanized Technologies Department, for their assistance and cooperation in the implementation of the project.

Keywords

• Chaff collector combines
• Combine losses
• Harvesting
• Losses
• Wheat

20.1001.1.22286829.1402.13.3.4.5

Main Subjects

• Agricultural waste management

©2022 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Agheleshkhani, A. R. (2017). The yield of the combine harvester compared to a typical wheat harvest. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 6(3), 1-9. (in Persian).
2. Ahmadi, K., Alizadeh, H., Ebadzadeh, H. R., Hosseinpour, R., Abdul Shah, E., Kazemian, A., & Rafiei, M. (2020). Agricultural Ministry of Agriculture-Jahad, Deputy for planning and economy, information and communication technology center. (in Persian).
3. Amirnejad, H., Rafiee, H., & Atai, K. (2009). Investigation of renovation effect of combine harvesters on wheat losses decrease in Iran. Journal of Agriculture, 11(1), 13-20. (in Persian).
4. Behroozi Lar, M. (1995). Grain Combine losses. National Project of Agricultural Education Research Organization. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Final report of the research project. (in Persian).
5. Dehghan, E., Afzali, M. J., Alizadeh, M., Salehi, S., & Dibaji, A. (2009). Investigation of grain loss and causes in wheat harvesters in Khuzestan province. Final report of Agriculture Engineering Research Institute with registration Number 88/947. (in Persian).
6. Dehghan, E., Ayvani, A., Hedayatipoor, A., Asadi, A., Taghinejad, J., Chaji, H., Omodmehr, Z., Zarifneshat, S., Abbasi, S., Afzali, J., Vahedi, A., Mahdinia, A., Gearmi, K., Shaker, M., Saeedi Rad, M. H., Mostoofi, M. R., Rostami, M. A., Safari, M., Zabolestani, M., & Sharifnasab, H. (2018). Assessing combine losses of wheat grain harvest in order to provide solutions to reduce it in Iran. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute Registration. Number 56539. (in Persian).
7. FMO. (1981). Combine harvesting. Published by John deer technical Services.
8. Ghaseminejad, M., Faramehr, M., & Abdshahi, A. (2018). Investigating the Effect of Field and Crop Conditions on Combine Performance in Wheat Harvesting. Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering, 49(3), 513-524. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2018.251190.665033
9. Mirasi, A., Asoodar, M. A., Samadi, M., & Kamran, E. (2014). The Evaluation of wheat losses harvesting in two Conventional Combine (John Deer 1165, 955) in Iran. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research, 2, 1417-1425. (in Persian).
10. Patel, S. K., & Varshney, B. P. (2014). Modeling of wheat crop harvesting losses. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 16, 97-102.
11. Rostami, S., Lotfalian, M., & Hosseinzadeh Samani, B. (2018). Assessment and Comparison of Conventional and Straw Walker Combines Harvesting Losses in Fars Province. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 19, 85-96. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2018.107988.1140
12. Rostami, M. A., Asadi, A., Bakhtiari, M. R., Jafari, M., Ranjbar, F., Zabolestani, M., Sharifnasab, H., Safari, M., & Gerami, K. (2021). Measuring the amount of wheat loss during harvesting with chaff combine harvesters in Iran. Final Report of Agricultural Engineering Research Institute.
13. Safari, M., Rostami, M. A., & Salehi, J. (2019). Introduction of wheat chaff combine harvesters. Journal of Agricultural Waste and Waste Management Promotion, 1, 26-34. (in Persian).
14. Tavakoli, A. R. (2013). Effects of Sowing Date and Limited Irrigation on Yield and Yield Components of Five Rainfed Wheat Varieties in Maragheh Region. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(6), 87-97. (in Persian). http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22518517.1391.2.6.9.9