Environmental Impact Assessment of Electricity Generation in Wind Power Plants (Case Study: Kahak Qazvin and Aqkand Miyaneh)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M. Nowroozipour ¹
• R. Tabatabaei koloor ²
• A. Motevali ²

¹ MSc Student in Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran

² Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2022.76180.1102

Abstract

Introduction
The world’s growing population has led to an inevitable increase in energy demand, and this, in addition to the depletion of non-renewable energy sources, can lead to several environmental issues. Wind power has proven to be a reliable and sustainable source of electricity, particularly in light of the pressing need to mitigate environmental impact and promote the use of renewable energy. The purpose of this research is to investigate and compare the environmental effects of electricity production from two wind power plants, Aqkand and Kahak, using wind turbines with a capacity of 2.5 megawatts for a period of three different lifetimes (20, 25, and 30 years).
Materials and Methods
The present study investigates the environmental effects of electricity generation during the life cycle of wind farms (Kahak and Aqkand) during the construction and operation of these power plants and the cumulative exergy demand index. The specifications of the wind turbines used in the current research are: turbine capacity of 2.5 MW, rotor diameter of 103 meters, rotor weight of 56 tonnes, three blades, each blade is 50.3 meters long and weighs 34.8 tonnes. The turbines are manufactured by Mapna and used in dry conditions. A functional unit of one kilowatt of electricity was selected and the data were analyzed in SIMAPRO software using IMPACT2002+ method with 15 midpoint indicators and four final indicators.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the stage of raw materials and production has the highest impact on the creation of midpoint indicators, which is due to extraction, manufacturing, and production of parts such as steel casting using non-renewable energy and activities such as high-temperature welding. The total environmental index of Aqkand and Kahak wind power plants for 1 kWh of generated electricity was 5.84 and 4.45 μPt respectively, more than half of which belongs to the damage to human health category. The investigation of the ionizing radiation index showed that the use of diesel fuel in the installation phase resulted in the highest amount of emissions in both of the power plants, so the share of pollutant emissions in the raw materials and production phase is more than 40%, and in the installation phase due to diesel fuel consumption was more than 48%. The investigation of the eutrophication index showed that the raw materials and production stage accounted for more than 95% of the damage to the ecosystem quality category, and in the meantime, copper and electrical components had the highest amount of contribution to the raw materials and production stage. Additionally, diesel fuel accounted for the largest part of the result in the installation stage, and the transportation and maintenance stage included less than 1% of this result. The investigation of the renewable energy consumption index showed that the stage of raw materials and turbine production in the Aqkand power plant with a share of 68% and the Kahak power plant with a share of 70% had the greatest effect on the category of resource damage. Also, the installation and commissioning phase was the second most effective factor in the category of resource damage due to the use of diesel fuel. The study of the cumulative exergy demand index showed that non-renewable-fossil resources had the largest share in exergy demand (0.15 MJ) to produce one kilowatt of electricity generated from power plants.
Conclusion
In this study, the results showed that in both plants, about 70% of various respiratory effects, 60% of human health issues, and 25% of acidification and global warming are caused in the raw materials and manufacturing phase. Furthermore, the installation phase is responsible for 17% and 16% of climate change in the Aqkand and Kahak power plants respectively, and between 14% and 26% of other environmental factors.

Keywords

• Cumulative exergy demand
• Environmental impact
• Iran
• Wind energy

20.1001.1.22286829.1402.13.4.2.5

Main Subjects

• Bioenergy

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

Aghahosseini, A., Bogdanov, D., Ghorbani, N., & Breyer, C. (2018). Analysis of 100% renewable energy for Iran in 2030: integrating solar PV, wind energy and storage. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 15, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1373-4

Al-Muhammad, S., & Piriaei, M. (2013). Use life cycle assessment to compare greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. Third Conference on Environmental Planning and Management. University of Tehran, Iran.

Alsaleh, A., & Sattler, M. (2019). Comprehensive life cycle assessment of large wind turbines in the US. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21, 887-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01678-0

Amani, A., & Hosseini Shamachi, A. (2009). The study of wind energy in the stations of the catchment area of the South Aras River. Journal of Geographical Space, 10, 1-26. (In Persian).

Azarpour, A., Suhaimi, S., Zahedi, G., & Bahadori, A. (2013). A review on the drawbacks of renewable energy as a promising energy source of the future. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 38, 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-012-0436-6

Bidstrup, M. (2015). Life cycle thinking in impact assessment—Current practice and LCA gains. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.003

Billinton, R., & Gao, Y. (2008). Multistate wind energy conversion system models for adequacy assessment of generating systems incorporating wind energy. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 23, 163-170 https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2006.882415

Bösch, M. E., Hellweg, S., Huijbregts, M. A., & Frischknecht, R. (2007). Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12, 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.11.282

British, P. (2006). BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Retrieved from: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2020-full-report.pdf. Accessed 2020

Chipindula, J., Botlaguduru, V. S. V., Du, H., Kommalapati, R. R., & Huque, Z. (2018). Life cycle environmental impact of onshore and offshore wind farms in Texas. Sustainability, 10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062022

Chu, Z., Zhao, T., Li, L., Fan, J., & Qin, Y. (2017). Characterization of antimicrobial poly (lactic acid)/nano-composite films with silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Materials, 10, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10060659

Dewulf, J., Bösch, M. E., De Meester, B., Van der Vorst, G., Van Langenhove, H., Hellweg, S., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2007). Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 8477-8483. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0711415

Gkantou, M., Rebelo, C., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2020). Life cycle assessment of tall onshore hybrid steel wind turbine towers. Energies, 13, 3950. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153950

Golbabaei, F., & Khadem, M. (2015). Air pollution in welding processes—assessment and control methods. Current Air Quality Issues, 33-63. https://doi.org/10.5772/59793

Guinée, J. B., & Lindeijer, E. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Springer Science & Business Media.

Guleria, R., Bhushan, B., Guleria, A., Bhushan, A., & Dulari, P. (2019). Harmful effects of ionizing radiation. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 7, 887-889. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2019.12141

Haapala, K. R., & Prempreeda, P. (2014). Comparative life cycle assessment of 2.0 MW wind turbines. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing, 3(2), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsm.2014.062496

Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B., & Matthews, H. S. (2010). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input-output approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781936331383

Jolliet, O., Antón, A., Boulay, A., Cherubini, F., Fantke, P., Levasseur, A., McKone, T. E., Michelsen, O., Canals, L. M., Motoshita, M., Pfister, S., Verones, F., Vigon, B., & Frischknecht, R. (2018). Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 2189-2207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1443-y

Joseph, V. S., Lucille, L., & Bruce, H. (2000). Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Electricity Generation Chain. IAEA Bulletin 42

Konstantinos, V., Karras, Y., Kohlhammer, J., Steiger, M., Tzovaras, D., & Gounopoulos, E. (2014). Enhanced Visual Analytics Services for the Optimal Planning of Renewable Energy Resources Installations. Pages 330-339. IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations: Springer.

Kouloumpis, V., Sobolewski, R. A., & Yan, X. (2020). Performance and life cycle assessment of a small scale vertical axis wind turbine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119520

Le Gourieres, D. (2014). Wind power plants: theory and design. Elsevier.

Li, H., Jiang, H. D., Dong, K. Y., Wei, Y. M., & Liao, H. (2020). A comparative analysis of the life cycle environmental emissions from wind and coal power. Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119192 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119192

Martínez, E., Latorre-Biel, J., Jiménez, E., Sanz, F., & Blanco, J. (2018). Life cycle assessment of a wind farm repowering process. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.044

Moore, J. (2021). A Comparison of the Environmental Effects of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energies.

Motahari, A., Ahmadian, M., Abedi, Z., & Ghaffarzadeh, H. (2014). Economic evaluation of wind power plants in Iran considering the effect of energy price liberalization policy. Iranian Journal of Energy Economics (Environmental and Energy Economics), 3, 179-200. (In Persian).

Paerl, H. W., & Otten, T. G. (2013). Harmful cyanobacterial blooms: causes, consequences, and controls. Microbial Ecology, 65, 995-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y

Peng, C., Shen, Y., Wu, X., Yuan, P., Jiang, L., Chen, S., Ze, S., Wang, X., & Song, X. (2020). Heavy metals, nitrogen, and phosphorus in sediments from the first drinking water reservoir supplied by Yangtze River in Shanghai, China: Spatial distribution characteristics and pollution risk assessment. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 231, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04651-6

Raadal, H. L., Gagnon, L., Modahl, I. S., & Hanssen, O. J. (2011). Life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the generation of wind and hydro power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 3417-3422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.001

Rezaei Kalaj, S., & Oashk Sarai, L. (2014). Investigation of environmental effects of electricity generation technologies (Case study of Manjil wind and hydropower plant). The Second National and Specialized Conference on Environmental Research in Iran. Hamedan, Hegmataneh Association of Environmental Assessors. (In Persian).

Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2020). Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121529

Solomon, K. R. (2008). Effects of ozone depletion and UV‐B radiation on humans and the environment. Atmosphere-Ocean, 46, 185-202. https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.460109

Standardization, I. O. F. (2006). Environmental management: life cycle assessment; Principles and Framework. ISO.

Statistical, I. (2019). Annual statistical report of iran water and electricity industry, Statistical reports of water and electricity, Ministry of Energy. Retrieved from: https://isn.moe.gov.ir

Stavridou, N., Koltsakis, E., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2020). Life Cycle Analysis of lattice and tubular wind turbine towers. A comparative study. Pages 012071. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012071.

Teffera, B., Assefa, B., Björklund, A., & Assefa, G. (2021). Life cycle assessment of wind farms in Ethiopia. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 76-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01834-5

Turkovska, O., Castro, G., Klingler, M., Nitsch, F., Regner, P. Soterroni, A. C. & Schmidt, J. (2021). Land-use impacts of Brazilian wind power expansion. Environmental Research Letters, 16, 024010. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4013396

Wang, S., & Wang, S. (2015). Impacts of wind energy on environment: A review. Renewable and Sustainable. Energy Reviews, 49, 437-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137

Wang, L., Wang, Y., Du, H., Zuo, J., Li, R. Y. M., Zhou, Z., ... & Garvlehn, M. P. (2019). A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China study. Applied Energy, 249, 37-45. https://doi.org/1/0,1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.099

Wang, S., Wang, S., & Liu, J. (2019). Life-cycle green-house gas emissions of onshore and offshore wind turbines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 804-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.031

Xu, L., Pang, M., Zhang, L., Poganietz, W. R., & Marathe, S. D. (2018). Life cycle assessment of onshore wind power systems in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 361-368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.014

Yuan, C., Bai, X., Zhu, T., Wen, Z., Cao, T., Zhang, X., & Ni, L. (2021). Long-Term Effects of the Harvesting of Trapa natans on Local Water Quality and Aquatic Macrophyte Community in Lake Erhai, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.706746

Zare Thani, H., & Nisari, P. (2016). Wind energy and its life cycle evaluation. 10^th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering (Biosystems) and Mechanization of Iran. Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).