Design, Construction, and Evaluation of an Automatic Feeder Control System for Sugarcane Billet Planters

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• B. Abbasian ¹
• M. E. Khorasani Ferdavani ²
• H. Zaki Dizaji ²

¹ M.Sc. in Mechanic of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

² Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22067/jam.2024.88301.1254

Abstract

Introduction
This study investigated the development and evaluation of an automatic feeder control system for sugarcane planters. The primary objective was to address limitations in existing machines and enhance their performance by introducing precise control of cane feeding.
Materials and Methods
The automatic feeder control system was equipped with three types of sensors, including a Load Cell Sensor that directly measures the weight of sugarcane on the feeder table. This feature provides a real-time assessment of cane availability. The Hydraulic Oil Pressure Sensor monitored the pressure within the hydraulic system that drives the feeder mechanism. Variations in pressure served as an indirect measure of the force applied to the cane during the feeding process. The Ultrasonic Distance Sensor employed ultrasonic waves to estimate the distance between the sensor and the sugarcane pile. Nevertheless, some limitations concerning accuracy and response time were identified. A microcontroller served as the central processing unit, receiving sensor data and generating control signals to regulate the feeder mechanism. This allowed for automation and eliminated the need for a manual operator. The performance of the automatic feeder control system was evaluated against a manual control method operated by a human.
Results and Discussion
The evaluation focused on three key aspects: cane spillage, planting quality, and control stability. Cane Spillage: the amount of sugarcane inadvertently dropped during the planting process. Automatic control methods using a load cell and hydraulic oil pressure sensor reduced spillage similarly to manual control, averaging approximately 8.8 t ha^-1. The ultrasonic sensor resulted in significantly lower spillage, achieving 7.4 t ha^-1. However, its limited accuracy and responsiveness led to undesirable gaps between the planted canes. Planting Quality: The implementation of automatic control techniques utilizing load cells and hydraulic oil pressure sensors successfully ensured uniform spacing between planted canes, achieving results comparable to traditional manual methods. Due to its shortcomings, the ultrasonic sensor created gaps between the planted canes, undermining the overall quality of the planting process. Control Stability: The method utilizing hydraulic oil pressure sensors exhibited limitations in maintaining consistent control under varying operational conditions. This stemmed from temperature-dependent changes in oil viscosity, which affected the pressure readings and ultimately the control signal. Based on the evaluation results, the load cell control method emerged as the most favorable option for automatic feeder control. It delivered performance that matches manual control in terms of cane spillage reduction and planting quality, all while eliminating the need for an operator. The hydraulic oil pressure sensor method, although effective in some aspects, presented challenges due to oil viscosity variations. The ultrasonic sensor showed promise for reducing spillage; however, it ultimately fell short due to its inability to accurately and swiftly detect the availability of cane, resulting in gaps between planted canes. A separate assessment was carried out to compare manual cultivation with an automatic control method based on weight measurements using a load cell. This evaluation revealed significant differences (p < 0.01) in billet weight, the number of billets utilized, and one-sided gaps between the two methods. However, no significant difference was observed in terms of two-sided gaps.
Conclusion
This study successfully designed and implemented an automatic feeder control system for sugarcane planters. The load cell control method emerged as the most effective solution, successfully eliminating the need for operators while ensuring high standards of planting quality and efficiency. Additional research could explore advancements in sensor technology and control algorithms to further enhance the performance of automatic feeder control systems.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Managing Director of Farabi Agro-Industrial Company and its staff, as well as the technical staff of Poya Sazan Sabz Avane Company, who cooperated in the preparation and evaluation stages of the system. Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran: financial support under the special research grant number SCU.AA98.505.

Keywords

• Hydraulic oil pressure sensor
• Load cell
• Metering feeder automation
• Sugarcane planter
• Ultrasonic distance sensor

Main Subjects

• Design and Construction

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

References

1. Abbasiyan, B., Khorasani Ferdavani, M. E., & Zaki Dizaji, H. (2019). Design and construction process of a sugarcane Billet planter suitable for sugarcane industries in Khuzestan province. 12^th National Conference on Biosystems Engineering and Mechanization. Ahvaz, Iran. (pp. 45-52). (in Persian).
2. Akbarnia, A. (2017). Design and fabrication of an experimental model of a seeding unit with widthwise sugarcane scions seeding for use in sugarcane planter. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 7(1), 312-321. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v7i1.45290
3. Almasi, M., Bakhoda, H., & Sahebi, Y. (2006). Design and construction of a sugarcane distributor and single-bud billet Planter. 04^th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Tabriz, Iran (pp. 21-27) (in Persian with English abstract).
4. Anonymous. (2018). Final report on cultivation with the new planter in Hakim Farabi Sugarcane Agro-Industries (quality and economic review). Applied research, Sugarcane & By Products Development Company. (in Persian).
5. Bozorgi, A. (2014). Design, Construction, and evaluation of a Billet feeder system for sugarcane billet planter. Master's thesis, Isfahan University of Technology. Department of Biosystems Engineering. (in Persian with English abstract).
6. Bronson, K., French, A., Conley, M., & Barnes, E. (2020). Use of an ultrasonic sensor for plant height estimation in irrigated cotton. Agronomy Journal, 113. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20552
7. Elwakeel, A. E., Mazrou, Y. S. A., Eissa, A. S., Okasha, A. M., Elmetwalli, A. H., Makhlouf, A. H., ..., & Elsayed, S. (2023). Design and Validation of a Variable-Rate Control Metering Mechanism and Smart Monitoring System for a High-Precision Sugarcane Transplanter. Agriculture, 13(12), 2218. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13122218
8. Han, J., Wen, S., Liu, Q. T., & Wu, J. Y. (2019). Design and test of pre-cutting type sugarcane planter. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 40(4), 109-118.
9. Khani, M., Razavi, J., & Hemat, A. (2006). Design, Construction and evaluation of distributor for sugarcane Billet planter with overlapped pattern. Master's thesis, Isfahan University of Technology. (in Persian with English abstract).
10. Khorasani Ferdavani, M. E., Alimaradni, R., & Omid, M. (2009). Design, Construction and Evaluation of Sugarcane Yield Monitoring System. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran. Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering. (in Persian with English abstract).
11. Mansouri, N., Zaki Dizaji, H., Sheikh Davoodi, M. J., & Asakare, A. (2019). Review and comparison of different methods of sugarcane stem planting under Khuzestan conditions. Agricultural Systems and Mechanization Research, 20(72), 73-90. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2018.114606.1207
12. Mohammadi, A., Almasi, M., & Sheikh Davoodi, M. J. (2002). Construction and testing of a sugarcane single-bander distributor. Master's thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (in Persian with English abstract).
13. Mostofi Sarkari, M., & Minaei, S. (2010). Performance evaluation of a continuous mass flow meter for harvesting machines of food products for use in precision agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 2(2), 141-150.
14. Namjoo, M., Razavı, J., & Khani, A. (2015). Fabrication and Evaluation of a Metering Device for a Sugarcane Billet Planter. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 25(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.236386
15. Razavi, S. J., Kardani, M., & Namjoo, M. (2013). Design, Development and evaluation of an Autonomous system for a sugarcane billet planter Hopper Lifting. 8^th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).
16. Saengprachatanarug, K., Wongpichet, S., Ueno, M., & Taira, E. (2016). Comparative Discharge and Precision Index of a Sugar Cane Billet Planter. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 32, 561-567. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.32.11073
17. Soleimani Varposhti, I., Zaki Dizaji, H., & Sheikh Davoodi, M. J. (2019). Evaluation of precision metering device for Sugarcane billet planting machines. Journal of Researches in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery, 8(2), 1-10. (in Persian with English abstract). https://jrmam.sku.ac.ir/article_10115.html?lang=en
18. Taghinezhad, J., Alimardani, R., & Jafari, A. (2013). Optimization cane traction output from hopper in full-automatic sugarcane planters by using response surface modeling and analytical hierarchy process. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 15, 138-147.
19. Taghinezhad, J., Alimardani, R., & Jafary, A. (2014). Development and evaluation of three metering device models for sugarcane setts. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001276
20. Wang, Meimei & Liu, Qingting & Ou, Yinggang & Zou, Xiaoping. (2021). Experimental Study of the Seed-Filling Uniformity of Sugarcane Single-Bud Billet Planter. Sugar Tech. 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00947-3
21. Wang, M., Liu, Q., Ou, Y., & Zou, X. (2022). Numerical simulation and verification of seed-filling performance of single-bud billet sugarcane seed-metering device based on EDEM. Agriculture, 12(7), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070983
22. Wang, M., Liu, Q., Yinggang, O., & Zou, X. (2022). Experimental Study of the Planting Uniformity of Sugarcane. Agriculture, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070908