Evaluations of Cereal Combine Harvester Head Attachment for Harvesting of Sunflower and Comparison with Conventional Harvesting Methods

Document Type : Research Article-en

Authors

• M. Safari ¹
• P. Ghiasi ²
• A. Rohani ³

¹ Department of Farm Machinery and Mechanization, Agriculture Engineering Research Institute, Agriculture Research Education, Extention Organization, Karaj, Iran

² Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2024.86827.1229

Abstract

In Iran, more than 50,000 hectares of sunflowers (oil and nuts) are cultivated annually. Conventional grain combine harvesters are not compatible with the unique characteristics of sunflowers, leading to significant grain losses during harvesting. Therefore, it is currently being harvested manually. Manual harvesting increases labor hardships, energy and time consumption, and production costs. In this research, to harvest sunflower seeds, modifications were made on conventional head of a combine harvester (John deer 1055) to allow simultaneous harvesting, threshing, and cleaning of the sunflower seeds. After designing and fabricating the accessory, the improved head in field conditions was evaluated and compared with conventional harvesting methods. The field evaluation of the improved head was based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments involved three different harvesting methods: 1) using a modified combine head, 2) employing a combine equipped with pan attachment, and 3) manual harvesting. In each of the machine treatments, beating and cleaning units were set up for sunflower harvest. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the treatments concerning machine losses, field capacity, and harvesting costs, all at the 5% significance level. In the modified combine, combine with pans attachment, and manual method, combine losses were 0.72, 4.85, and 6%, and field capacity was 1.2, 1.13, and 0.12 ha h^-1, respectively. The profit-to-cost ratio was 13.97, 13.3, and 3.01, respectively. The grain breakage percentage was 3, 3.3, and 0.56, respectively. According to the results, due to lower losses, appropriate field capacity, and lower harvesting costs, the use of John deer 1055 combine with the modified head is recommended for harvesting of the sunflower.

Keywords

• Attachment
• Combine head
• Harvesting
• Improvement
• Sunflower

Main Subjects

• Design and Construction

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

References

1. Ahmadi, K., Ebadzadeh, H. R., Hatami, F., Abdshah, H., & Kazemian, A. (2020). Agricultural statistic letter. Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. Planning and Economic Deputy, Information and Communication Technology Center. Vol: 1.
2. Anonymous. (2005). High plains sunflower production. Handbook. Kansas state university, Agricultural Experimentation and Cooperative Extension Service.
3. Anonymous. (2019). Instructions for sampling, determination of moisture and impurities of oilseeds (sunflower seeds and soybeans). Cereals Research Center, Purchasing and Maintenance Group. https://zakhiresazigroup.blogfa.com/post/94
4. Dekalb, D. P. (1987). Sunflower. Culture and Management. Agriculture Research Inc. Illinois DK 79660, 87591, ISF-2-Ih. Harvest and Storage.
5. Elfatih Mohammed, A. H. (2014). Effect of combine harvester forward and reel speeds on sunflower harvesting losses in Gadarif Area (Sudan). Khartoum.
6. Ghiasi, P., & Safari, M.(2021). Modeling grain losses in mechanized harvesting of oily sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 11(2), 399-408. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v11i2.84191
7. Grower, G.(1971). Sunflower Attachment for Combines. Field Crops, 145-745.
8. Hoffman, V., Berglund, D., & Hellevarge, K. (1982). Sunflower Production, Harvesting, Drying and Storage. ASAE, 33-41.
9. Husiman, V. (1977). Combine Adjustment for Harvesting Sunflowers Cooperative Extension Service. North Dakota State.
10. Mozaffari, H., & Hassanpour Darvish, H. (2012). Investigation of Different Methods of Combined Irrigation with Saline and Sweet Water on the Percentage and Yield of Oil and the Fatty Acid Composition of Sunflower Oil. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition,
11. Nalobina, О. O., Vasylchuk, N. V., Bundza, О. Z., Holotiuk, M. V., Veselovska, N. R., & Oshchuk,
12. N. V. Z. (2019). A New Technical Solution of a Header for Sunflower Harvesting in MATEH Agricultural Engineering https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-58-14
13. NDSU. (2014). Sunflower Production. Extension Publication A-1331 EB-25 revised, 101.
14. Nyborg, E. O., Thauberger, Gregory, J. C., & Pool, L. (1980). Stanley Sunflower Harvesting Attachment. Pami Evaluation Report. Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute. ISSN:0383-3445.
15. Roth, S., & Heyde, J. (2002). Partial Budgeting for Agricultural Businesses. Penn State University, University Park, PA, CAT UA366 7.
16. Sayed, E., & Abd El Maksoud, G. H. SF. (2012). Evaluating the Performance of a Modified Grain Combine Harvester Used for Sunflower Crops. AGRIS, 87, 73.
17. Shaforostov, V. D., & Makarov, S. S. (2019). The Header for a Breeding Plot Combines for Sunflower Harvesting, Acta Technologica Agriculturae, Slovaca Universitas Nitra, Slovaca Universitas Agriculturae Nitriae, 60-63. https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2019-0011
18. Thierstin, G. (1990). Header Loss in Harvesting. Sunflower. ASAE 90-6049, 12.
19. ZACH. (1981). Evaluation Report of Zach Sunflower Harvesting Attachment, in: E0280B, N. (Ed.), Tested at Portage, Prairie ISSN 0383-3445.