Field and Economic Evaluation of Spraying Drones Versus Boom Sprayers for Weed and Yellow Rust control in Wheat fields

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M. Safaeinezhd
• M. Ghasemi-Nejad Raeini
• M. Taki

Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2025.91236.1322

Abstract

Introduction
One of the key structural factors in agricultural mechanization is the selection of appropriate technology. Today, examining the effects of technology application and development on agricultural production remains of highly importance. Innovative technologies, such as spraying drones, play a critical role in advancing agriculture and ensuring food security. Without these technologies and proper input management, environmental impacts are likely to intensify. Achieving sustainable production and ensuring food security is a major challenge for researchers and global policymakers. This study evaluates and compares the performance of spraying drones and boom sprayers in controlling weeds and yellow rust disease in wheat fields. The aim of this study is to optimize pesticide use and achieve sustainable agriculture.
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted to evaluate the field performance and economic feasibility of using spraying drones compared to boom sprayers for controlling weeds and yellow rust disease in wheat fields. Experiments were carried out in regional Khorramabad, Iran, using a DJI Agras MG-1P spraying drone and a 400-liter 400B8 TF boom sprayer. The aim was to investigate the impact of modern technology, specifically spraying drones, compared to traditional methods, such as boom sprayers, for managing weeds and yellow rust disease. Additionally, the study assessed the profitability of these technologies. The experiments followed a randomized complete block design with three treatments: boom sprayer, spraying drone, and control. They were conducted in two separate, independent fields to examine treatment effects on weeds and yellow rust in wheat. For weeds control, 2-4-D herbicide was applied at 1.5 L ha^-1, and for yellow rust control, Tilt fungicide was used at 0.5 L ha^-1.
Results and Discussion
Results showed that the deposition rate of pesticides in boom sprayers (82.8%) was higher than with drone spraying (69.9%). Furthermore, the average dry weight of weeds in boom sprayer was 172 g m^-2, and in drone spraying, it was 163 g m^-2, which was not statistically significant. Additionally, the average weed density was 25 plants per square meter for boom sprayers and 29.3 plants per square meter for drone spraying, with no statistically significant difference. The average harvest index in weed control experiments was 44% for boom sprayer and 41% for drone spraying, which was statistically significant at the 1% level. The average severity of yellow rust infection in wheat fields was 30.7% for boom sprayer and 25.3% for drone spraying, which was not statistically significant at the 1% level, but both treatments were significantly different from the control (68.3%). The harvest index in yellow rust experiments was better in drone spraying (43.8%) compared to boom sprayer (41.9%). The total annual cost for drone owners in the studied region (2980.3 million rials) was higher than the total cost for boom sprayer owners (513.48 million rials). However, the benefit-cost ratio for drone owners (1.215) exceeded that of boom sprayer owners (1.030), demonstrating economic viability for both sprayers. Overall, drones are found to be more economical for spraying than boom sprayers due to their higher efficiency and profitability. The use of drones can significantly increase the efficiency and profitability of spraying operations.
Conclusion
The results of this study showed that both drone and boom sprayer were effective in reducing the dry weight of weeds, but there was no statistically significant difference between them. Weed density was higher with drone spraying, and the harvest index was better with drone spraying compared to boom sprayer. The costs of using drones were higher than boom sprayers, but despite the higher costs, drones are superior option for spraying due to their increased efficiency and profitability.

Keywords

• Boom Sprayer
• Cost-Benefit
• Drone
• Effectiveness
• Spray Deposition

Main Subjects

• Precision Farming

References

1. Alipour, A., Karimmojeni, H., Zali, A. G., Razmjoo, J., & Jafari, Z. (2022). Weed management in Allium hirtifolium production by herbicides application. Industrial Crops and Products, 177, 114407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114407
2. Almasi, M., Kiani, S., & Louimi, N. )2014(. Fundamentals of agricultural mechanization. Gofteman Andisheh moaserPress
3. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. (2011). ASAE D497.7: Agricultural machinery management data. St. Joseph, MI: ASAE. Retrieved from: https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=36431
4. Baweja, P., Kumar, S., & Kumar, G. (2020). Fertilizers and Pesticides: Their Impact on Soil Health and Environment. In Soil Health (pp. 265-285). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44364-1_15
5. BehzadiPour, F., Ghasemi Nejad Raeini, M., Asoodar, M. A., Marzban, A., & Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S. (2017). Regression study of technical factors of drift and droplet diameter in spraying using laboratory and software methods. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering (pp. 101-109). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.61565
6. Berner, B., & Chojnacki, J. (2017). Influence of the air stream produced by the drone on the sedimentation of the liquid sprayed that contains entomopathogenic nematodes. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 3, 1-8.
7. Boatwright, H., Zhu, H., Clark, A., & Schnabel, G. (2020). Evaluation of the Intelligent Sprayer System in peach production. Plant Disease, 104(12), 3207-3212. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-04-20-0696-RE
8. Daum, T. (2023). Mechanization and sustainable agri‑food system transformation in the Global South. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43,16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00868-x
9. Dear, B. S., Sandral, G. A., Spencer, D., Khan, M. R. I., & Higgins, T. J. V. (2003). The tolerance of three transgenic subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) lines with the bxn gene to herbicides containing bromoxynil. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(3), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR02134
10. Dou, H., Zhang, C., Li, L., Hao, G., Ding, B., Gong, W., & Huang, P. (2018). Application of variable spray technology in agriculture. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 186(5), 012007. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/186/5/012007
11. Eskouinejad, M. M. (2020). Engineering Economics (Economic Evaluation of Industerial Projects).
12. Fathi, R., Ghasemi-Nejad Raeini, M., Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S., Taki, M., & Mardani Najafabadi, M. (2024). Comparison and evaluation of common orchard sprayers with variable-rate sprayers. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 14(2), 123-135. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2023.84946.1198
13. Garcerá, C., Moltó, E., & Chueca, P. (2017). Spray pesticide applications in Mediterranean citrus orchards: Canopy deposition and off-target losses. Science of the Total Environment, 599, 1344-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.029
14. Ghaseminejad Raeini, M., Sheikh Davoodi, M., Almasi, M., Bahrami, H., Zand, E., & Alamisaeid, K. (2014). Effects of tillage, fertilization and weed control methods on corn yield in the northern part of Khuzestan. Agricultural Engineering, 36(2), 1-16. https://agrieng.scu.ac.ir/article_10475.html?lang=en
15. Gil, E., Gallart, M., Llorens, J., & Balsari, P. (2013). Ground deposition and airborne spray drift assessment in vineyard and orchard: The influence of environmental variables and sprayer settings. Sustainability, 9(5), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050728
16. Hamuda, E., Glavin, M., & Jones, E. (2016). A survey of image processing techniques for plant extraction and segmentation in the field. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 125, 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.04.024
17. Hercher-Pasteur, J., Loiseau, E., Sinfort, C., & Helias, A. (2020). Energetic assessment of the agricultural production system. A review. |Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00627-2
18. Iost Filho, F. H., Heldens, W. B., Kong, Z., & de Lange, E. S. (2020). Drones: Innovative technology for use in precision pest management. Journal of Economic Entomology, 113(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz268
19. Jafar, A., Bibi, N., Naqvi, R. A., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Jeong, D. (2024). Revolutionizing agriculture with artificial intelligence: Plant disease detection methods, applications, and their limitations. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1356260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1356260
20. Khan, B. A., Nadeem, M. A., Nawaz, H., Amin, M. M., Abbasi, G. H., Nadeem, M., Ali, M., Ameen, M., Javaid, M. M., Maqbool, R., Ikram, M., & Ayub, M. A. (2023). Pesticides: Impacts on agriculture productivity, environment, and management strategies. In T. Aftab (Ed.), Emerging contaminants and plants (pp. 109-134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22269-6_5
21. Lu, X., Campos, J., Salas, B., Fabregas, F. X., Zhu, H., & Gil, E. (2023). Advanced spraying systems to improve pesticide saving and reduce spray drift for apple orchards. Precision Agriculture, 24(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10007-x
22. Mansfield, B., Werner, M., Berndt, C., Shattuck, A., Galt, R., Williams, B., Argüelles, L., Barri, F. R., Ishii, M., Kunin, J., Lapegna, P., Romero, A., Caicedo, A., Abhigya, Castro-Vargas, M. S., Marquez, E., Ojeda, D., Ramirez, F., & Tittor, A. (2023). A new critical social science research agenda on pesticides. Agriculture and Human Values, 41, 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-023-10492-w
23. Mozaffari Gonbari, M., Yosefzadeh Taheri, M. R., & Soleymani, J.)2019(. Investigation of technical performance and efficiency of different backpack sprayers on onion thtips control. Agricultural Mechanization Journal, 4)2(,121-132. https://jam.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9589.html?lang=en
24. Orak, H., Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S., Asoodar, M. A., & Elahifard, E. )2021(. Design, construction, and evaluation of an automatic sprayer system for online weed-plant detection in sugar beet fields. https://doi.org/10.22092/jsb.2022.355302.1298
25. Patil, A. S., & Mailapalli, D. R. (2020). Fertilizers and pesticides: Their impact on soil health and environment. In Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 345-367). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44364-1_15
26. Patil, A. S., Mailapalli, D. R., & Singh, P. K. (2024). Drone technology reshaping agriculture: A meta-review and bibliometric analysis on fertilizer and pesticide deployment. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 24(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-024-00240-1
27. Pergher, G., & Petris, R. (2001). The effect of air flow rate on spray deposition in a Guyot-trained vineyard. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 78(3), 335-345.
28. Porker, K., Straight, M., & Hunt, J. R. (2020). Evaluation of G× E× M interactions to increase harvest index and yield of early sown wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00994
29. Rezaei Moradali, M., Eivazi, A. R., & Shir Alizadeh, S. (2020). Effect of yellow rust disease on agronomic and physiological characteristics of winter and facultative bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 22(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.29252/abj.22.1.81
30. Safavi, S. (2019). Evaluation of wheat resistance genes to yellow rust disease and pathogenicity factors of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici over two years in Ardabil. Applied Research in Plant Protection (Agricultural Science), 8(3), 95-107. https://arpp.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9730.html
31. Salcedo, R., Pons, P., Llop, J., Zaragoza, T., Campos, J., Ortega, P., Gallart, M., & Gil, E. (2019). Dynamic evaluation of airflow stream generated by a reverse system of an axial fan sprayer using 3D-ultrasonic anemometers. Effect of canopy structure. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 163, 104851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.06.006
32. Shabani, A., & Sepaskhah, A. R. (2019). Reviewing the harvest index estimation in crop modeling. Iran Agricultural Research, 38(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.22099/iar.2019.5455
33. Soheilifard, F., Marzban, A., Raini, M. G., Taki, M., & van Zelm, R. (2020). Chemical footprint of pesticides used in citrus orchards based on canopy deposition and off-target losses. Science of the Total Environment, 746, 139118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139118
34. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., ... & Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0
35. Subramanian, K. S., Pazhanivelan, S., Srinivasan, G., Santhi, R., & Sathiah, N. (2021). Drones in insect pest management. Frontiers in Agronomy, 3, 640885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.640885
36. Taheri-Rad, A., Khojastehpour, M., Rohani, A., Khoramdel, S., & Nikkhah, A. (2017). Energy flow modeling and predicting the yield of Iranian paddy cultivars using artificial neural networks. Energy, 135, 405-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.089
37. Tillett, N. D., Hague, T., Grundy, A. C., & Dedousis, A. P. (2008). Mechanical within-row weed control for transplanted crops using computer vision. Biosystems Engineering, 99(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.09.026
38. Usigbe, J., Asem-Hiablie, S., Uyeh, D. D., Iyiola, O., Park, T., & Mallipeddi, R. (2024). Enhancing resilience in agricultural production systems with AI-based technologies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 21955-21983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03588-0
39. Ying, K. C., & Tsai, Y. J. (2017). Minimising total cost for training and assigning multiskilled workers in seru production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 55(10), 2978-2989. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1277594
40. Zarifneshat, S., Saeidirad, M. H., Safari, M., Motame AlShariati, H. R., & Naseri, M. )2022(. Tecnical Evaluation of Agriculture drone sprayer for control of wheat weeds and comparison with conventional methods. Agriculture System and Machanizatoin Research, 23)82(, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.22092/amsr.2022.360045.1427
41. Zhang, R., Hewitt, A. J., Chen, L., Li, L., & Tang, Q. (2016). Challenges and opportunities of unmanned aerial vehicles as a new tool for crop pest control. Pest Management Science, 72(11), 4123-4131. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7683