Structural and Performance Evaluation of a Pollen-duster, Designed for Date Farms

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• F. Akhavan ¹
• S. Kamgar ¹
• A. A. Golneshan ²

¹ Department of Biosystems Engineering, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

² Department of Thermo-Fluids, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v9i2.68916

Abstract

Introduction
Pollinating elevated date palms has been a challenging problem for many years. A few types of equipment have been designed and manufactured in the last fifty years, using either low pressure or compressed air to overcome this problem. However traditional pollination is still the most popular method in none-mechanized and small date farms. In the present research, a light portable electrical pollen-duster has been developed and tested.
Materials and Methods
A powerful ducted fan, equipped with a speed controller and a servo tester was made and installed on the top of a 6 -7.7m long carbon fiber boom, to provide a high volume rate of air flow for pollination. A small part of air flow is conducted through a by-pass tube to hit the pollen/pollen-flour blend in the pollen bin and suspend it. The rest of air flow, passing through a venturi, is responsible to provide a relative vacuum at the opening of pollen bin to pull up the suspended pollen and throw it toward the date palm crown. Although plain flour is traditionally used as filler in mechanical pollinators, however, SEM imaging showed that pasta flour particles are bigger than plain flour particles and are closer in size to pollen particles. Also, Repose angle of date pollen was measured as 38º where plain flour and pasta flour showed 44.9º and 40.7º respectively (figures 6 and 7). So, Pasta flour was used instead of plain flour to make a blend.
To provide a low-weight pollen-duster, wires extending from ducted fan to its actuating equipment (battery, servo tester, and speed controller) were selected to be a combination of 2.5mm2 (3 meters) and 1.5mm2 (3 meters) types in the standard boom. This lowered the applied force on the operator’s hand by 33% (Figure 5 and equations 4 and 5).
Evaluation of the pollen-duster has been performed in Khoor town in Isfahan province of Iran. Eighteen trees of Kabkab variety were pollinated in a completely random test with 6 treatments (five mechanical treatments compared with traditional treatment). Mechanical treatments were using 0.5, 1.5 and 2.5g pure pollen and 2 and 6g pollen-flour blend (in 1:3 ratio) in each of the three weekly repetitions. After 8 weeks, in kimri stage, normal, abnormal (non- pollinated), and dropped fruits on some randomly selected strands were counted to determine pollination as well as fruit setting efficiencies. Fruits weight in each treatment was measured on some random fruits in the Tamar stage. A new index; called "pollen consumption index", was introduced to provide a measure of pollen consumption rate in order to prevent redundant pollen consumption which has no sensible effect on the yield.  
Results and Discussion
Calculated pollination and fruit setting efficiencies did not show a significant difference in all treatments, convincing that the traditional method could be replaced by pollen-duster without any yield difference. It offers benefits of lower pollen consumption; more trees pollinated in a day and also safer pollination due to reducing number of trees climbing. It was also shown that a tree could be pollinated properly with 0.5g pollen, so each hectare of date farm (120 trees) needs almost 180g pollen for all three replications, almost 1/4 of Perkins consumption report and 1/3 of Mostaan for three replications. Fruits weights of two pollen-flour treatments were significantly lower than others. As there is not any report available on the effect of the presence of flour or concentration of pollen on date fruits weights, so with the available data no definite reasoning can be made.
Conclusion
The developed pollen-duster could be used instead of the traditional date palm pollination method with the same fruit set and lower pollen consumption. The weight of the fruits in pollen-flour treatments `was lower than pure pollen and traditional treatments.

Keywords

• Date palm
• Fruit set
• Pollen-duster

20.1001.1.22286829.1398.9.2.14.5

References

1. Al-Rawi, O. M. A. 1988. Date palm pollinator.US Patent No.4,751,791.

2. Al-Wusaibai, N. A., A. Ben Abdallah, M. S. Al-Husainai, H. Al-Salman, and M. Elballaj. 2012. A comparative study between mechanical and manual pollination in two premier Saudi Arabian date palm cultivars. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 5: 2487-2490.

3. Boumans, G. 1985. Developments in agricultural engineering 4: grain handling and storage: New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc.

4. Brown, G., R. Perkins, and E. Vis. 1970. Mechanical pollination experiments with the Deglet Noor date palm in 1960. Date Growers’ Institute 47: 19-25.

5. Brown, R. M., and E. G. V. Perkins. 1972. Experiments with aircraft methods for pollinating dates. The Punjab Fruit Jurnal 119: 116-127.

6. Carpenter, J. 1981. Improvement of traditional date culture. The Date Palm 1: 1-17.

7. Dowson, V. H. M. 1982. Date production and protection with special reference to North Africa and the Near East. Rome, Italy: FAO. Report no. 35

8. El-Kassas, S. E., and H. M. Mahmoud. 1986. The possibility of pollinating date palm by diluted pollen. Pages 317-322.

9. ElMardi, M. O., H. Esechie, L. M. Ai-Kharousi, and K. M. Abdelbasit. 2002. Effect of pollination method on changes in physical and chemical characteristics of date fruit during development. Agricultural Sciences 7: 21-27.

10. Ghazanfari, M., M. Maharlooie, A. Shirzadifar, and M. Loghavi. 2012. Design, development and evauation of a pneumatic pollinator for reducing pollination time and improving man power and date production efficiency. in 7th conference of farm machinery engineering and mechanization. Shiraz University. (In Farsi).

11. Haffar, I. 1999. Design and performance testing of a micro-duster for date palm pollination. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 15: 267-271.

12. Haffar, I., H. AlJuburi, M. H. Ahmed. 1997. Effect of pollination frequency and pollen concentration on yield and fruit characteristics of mechanically pollinated date palm trees (Phoenix dactylifera var. Khalas). Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 68: 11-14.

13. Khodabakhshian, R., and B. Emadi. 2016. Determination of ripeness stages of Mazafati variety of date fruit by Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 6: 201-213. (In Farsi).

14. Loghavi, M. 1993. Development of a mechanical date pollinator. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa And Latin America 24: 27-32.

15. Mostaan, A. 2014. Design and developmentof an electric date palm pollinator. Mechanical Science in Agricultural Machinery 1: 13 .(In Farsi).

16. Mostaan, A., S. S. Marashi, and S. Ahmadizadeh. 2010. Development of a new date palm pollinator. in 4th Int. Date Palm Conference. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

17. Nielsen, S. S. 2010. Food analysis. Springer.

18. Perkins, R., and P. Burkner. 1974. Mechanical pollination of date palms. California Agriculture 28: 6-7.

19. Robinson, M. L., B. Brown, and C. Williams. 2012. The date palm in southern Nevada. The University of Nevada 23: 1-26.

20. Shafique, M., A. Khan, A. U. Malik, M. Shahid, I. A. Rajvana, B. A. Saleem, M. Amin, and E. Ahmad. 2011. Influence of pollen source and pollination frequency on fruit drop, yield and quality of date palm (phoenix dactylifera L.) CV. Dhakki. Pakistan Journal of Botany 43: 831-839.

21. Teeba.ae. 2017. teeba.ae. http://www.teeba.ae/pollenatomizerextractor.html.

22. Zaid, A., and P. F. De Wet. 1999. Date Palm Cultivation. FAO plant production and protection papers 156.