Effect of Gaseous Fuels and Coolant Temperature on Performance and Combustion Characteristics of a Low-Speed Single Cylinder Diesel Engine

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• B. Sabahi ¹
• H. Bahrami ²
• M. J. Sheikhdavoodi ²
• S. M. Safieddin Ardebili ²
• E. Houshyar ³

¹ Ph.D. Student of Agricultural Mechanization, College of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

² Department of Biosystem Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

³ Department of Biosystem Engineering, College of Agriculture, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2021.68089.1007

Abstract

Introduction
Today, diesel engines provide the main power source for the world equipment e.g., common propulsion generators in industry and agriculture. These engines are widely used due to their high combustion efficiency, reliability, compatibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, diesel engines are one of the most critical consumers of fuel which in turn causes some environmental pollution. One of the convenient and low-cost ways to reduce the pollution of these engines is dual-fuel mode and the use of gaseous fuels as an alternative fuel. This study investigated the effect of blending CNG and LPG with neat diesel in dual-fuel mode. Besides, the variation in engine coolant temperature on engine performance characteristics was experimentally studied.
Materials and Methods
The experimental apparatus consisted of a stationary, four-stroke, naturally aspirated, water-cooled, single-cylinder compression ignition engine. To control the engine load, an electrical dynamometer was made using a 7.5 kW three-phase generator and coupled to the engine as a cradle. A load cell was used to determine the force applied to the generator. The engine speed was monitored continuously by a tachometer. Fuel consumption was measured by using a weight method. A thermostat with variable temperature was used to control the temperature of the engine coolant. To measure the mass flow of air entering the cylinder, an airbox with a sharp edge orifice was used. For this study, factorial experiments in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications were utilized to analyze the data statistically. The studied parameters were three levels of fuel ratio (100% diesel, 20% diesel and 80%± 2% CNG, 20% diesel and 80%±2% LPG), 11 engine speeds (1500 to 1600 rpm with 10 rpm intervals), and three engine coolant temperatures (50, 60, and 70 °C). All experiments were conducted in the governor control mode.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that the torque, brake power and brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) in the diesel-CNG mode at all engine speeds and in the diesel-LPG mode at low engine speeds significantly increased compared to pure diesel. The increases in these parameters in the diesel-CNG mode were 18.67%, 19.56% and 19.85%, and in the diesel-LPG mode were 14.02%, 13.86% and 14.2%, compared to those related to the pure diesel, respectively. This increase could be due to the high calorific value of gas fuels and improvement of combustion inside the cylinder due to the formation of homogeneous charge. At low engine speeds, the reductions in the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) and brake specific energy consumption (BSEC) for coolant temperature 60 °C were 11.21% and 10.77%, compared to coolant temperature 50 °C, respectively. Also, the BSFC and BSEC for diesel-CNG dual-fuel mode decreased by 8.12% and 10.81%, respectively. These values for the diesel-LPG dual-fuel mode were 5.4% and 2.4%, respectively. The brake thermal efficiency (BTE) also showed a significant increase at high speeds and when using the dual-fuel operational mode. However, raising the coolant temperature due to reducing the heat losses of the engine increased the BTE. The increases in BTE for coolant temperatures 60 and 70 °C were 7.19% and 4.37%, compared to the coolant temperature of 50 °C, respectively. When using the engine in dual-fuel mode, the volumetric efficiency due to reducing the air ratio showed a significant reduction. These diesel-CNG and diesel-LPG dual-fuel mode values were 20.31% and 24%, respectively. Furthermore, raising the coolant temperature diminished the volumetric efficiency. The reduction in volumetric efficiency for the coolant temperatures of 60 °C and 70 °C were 6.84% and 19.91% compared to the coolant temperature of 50 °C, respectively.
Conclusion
The following conclusions can be deduced based on this study:
The use of gaseous fuels as the main fuel and with a small amount of diesel in compression ignition engines is possible and improves the engine's performance characteristics.
In the diesel-CNG mode, torque, brake power and BMEP at all engine speeds and in the diesel-LPG mode at low engine speeds significantly increased compared to pure diesel because of improved combustion inside the cylinder.
At low engine speeds, increasing the coolant temperature reduced the BSFC and BSEC. Also, in the dual-fuel mode compared to the engine with baseline diesel fuel, the BSFC and BSEC were significantly lower due to the higher calorific value of gaseous fuels and higher power generation.
The BTE at high engine speeds and when the engine was in dual-fuel mode showed a significant increase. Also, increasing the coolant temperature due to reducing the heat losses of the engine increased the BTE.
When using the engine in the dual-fuel mode, due to the volume of air replaced by the gas, the volumetric efficiency showed a significant reduction. Also, raising the coolant temperature diminished the volumetric efficiency.
Overall, it can be stated that the use of a diesel-CNG dual-fuel mode with a coolant temperature of 60 °C at entire engine speeds has the best outputs on the performance and combustion characteristics of the engine.

Keywords

• Brake power
• Coolant temperature
• Dual-fuel diesel engine
• Engine performance
• Gaseous fuels

20.1001.1.22286829.1401.12.3.7.1

Open Access

©2021 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Abdelghaffar, W. A., M. M. Osman, M. N. Saeed, and A. I. Abdelfatteh. 2002. Effects of coolant temperature on the performance and emissions of a diesel engine. Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference. 16885: 187-197. DOI: 1115/ICES2002-464
2. Anonymus. 2010. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use In Transportation Model. GREET Argonne, IL.
3. Ayhan, V., A. Parlak, I. Cesur, B. Boru, and A. Kolip. 2011. Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a diesel engine running with LPG. International Journal of Physical Sciences 6: 1905-1914. DOI: 5897/IJPS11.288
4. Barata, J. M. 1995. Performance and emissions of a dual fueled DI diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper. Report no. 0148-7191. DOI: 4271/952364
5. Bari, S., and S. Hossain. 2019. Performance of a diesel engine run on diesel and natural gas in dual-fuel mode of operation. Energy Procedia 160: 215-222. DOI: 1016/j.egypro.2019.02.139
6. Chaichan, M. T. 2014. Combustion of dual fuel type natural gas/liquid diesel fuel in compression ignition engine. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR JMCE) 11: 48-58.
7. Chandra, R., V. Vijay, P. Subbarao, and T. Khura. Performance evaluation of a constant speed IC engine on CNG, methane enriched biogas and biogas. Applied Energy 88: 3969-3977. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.032
8. Hariprasad, T. 2013. Effect of injection pressure on performance of dual fuel diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper. Report 0148-7191. DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-2887
9. Hossain, A., D. Smith, and P. Davies. 2017. Effects of engine cooling water temperature on performance and emission characteristics of a CI engine operated with biofuel blend. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 5: 46-57. DOI: 13044/j.sdewes.d5.0132
10. Jian, D., G. Xiaohong, L. Gesheng, and Z. Xintang. 2001. Study on diesel-LPG dual fuel engines. SAE Technical Paper. Report no. 0148-7191. DOI: 4271/2001-01-3679
11. Karagöz, Y., T. Sandalcı, U. O. Koylu, A. S. Dalkılıç, and S. Wongwises. 2016. Effect of the use of natural gas–diesel fuel mixture on performance, emissions, and combustion characteristics of a compression ignition engine. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 8 (4): 1-13. DOI: 1177/1687814016643228
12. Lounici, M. S., K. Loubar, L. Tarabet, M. Balistrou, D. C. Niculescu, and M. Tazerout. 2014. Towards improvement of natural gas-diesel dual fuel mode: An experimental investigation on performance and exhaust emissions. Energy 64: 200-211. DOI: 1016/j.energy.2013.10.091
13. Mahla, S. K., V. Singla, S. S. Sandhu, and A. Dhir. 2018. Studies on biogas-fuelled compression ignition engine under dual fuel mode. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 9722-9729. DOI: 1007/s11356-018-1247-4
14. Maji, S., A. Pal, and B. Arora. 2008. Use of CNG and diesel in CI engines in dual fuel mode. SAE Technical Paper. Report no. 0148-7191. DOI: 4271/2008-28-0072
15. Martyr, A. , and M. A. Plint. 2011. Engine testing: theory and practice. Elsevier.
16. Mehmet, Selim Tangoz, S. O. Akansu, and N. Kahraman. 2019. Alternative Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines. PP 27-55 in A. P. Carlucci eds. The Future of Internal Combustion Engines., London.
17. Najafi, B. 2011. Experimental investigation of the effect of using biodiesel and biogas on dual fuel diesel engine. Fuel and combustion 4: 73-85. (In Persian).
18. Najafi, B., V. Pirouzpanah, G. Najafi, T. Yusaf, and B. Ghobadian. 2007. Experimental investigation of performance and emission parameters of a small diesel engine using CNG and biodiesel. SAE Technical Paper. Report no.  2007-32-0075.
19. Nugroho, A., N. Sinaga, and I. Haryanto. 2018. Performance of a compression ignition engine four strokes four cylinders on dual fuel (diesel–LPG). AIP Conference Proceedings: 2014, 020166-1–020166-7. DOI: 1063/1.5054570
20. Papagiannakis, R. G. 2018. Comparative Assessment for Improvement of Performance and Exhaust Emissions in Existing Dual-Fuel Diesel Engines. Journal of Energy Engineering 144 (5): 04018054 DOI: 1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000572
21. Santosh, B., and S. Kumarappa. 2015. Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Single Cylinder Four Stroke CI Engine on Dual Fuel Mode by Using Compressed Biogas as a Fuel. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 3 (9): 376-382.
22. Thomas, S., A. Saroop, R. Rajak, and S. Muthiah. 2011. Investigation on the effect of coolant temperature on the performance and emissions of naturally aspirated gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper. Report no. 0148-7191. DOI: 4271/2011-26-0089
23. Wei, L., and P. Geng. 2016. A review on natural gas/diesel dual fuel combustion, emissions and performance. Fuel Processing Technology 142: 264-278. DOI: 1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.018
24. Wei, L., C. Yao, Q. Wang, W. Pan, and G. Han. 2015. Combustion and emission characteristics of a turbocharged diesel engine using high premixed ratio of methanol and diesel fuel. Fuel 140: 156-163. DOI: 1016/j.fuel.2014.09.070
25. Yusaf, T. F., D. Buttsworth, K. H. Saleh, and B. Yousif. 2010. CNG-diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis with the aid of artificial neural network. Applied Energy 87 (5): 1661-1669 DOI: 1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.009