with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Deparetment of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
As the world population grows up, the quantity and quality of human food must be improved. The production yield of marine aquaculture and farming of aquatic organisms, as a valuable source of food, will be increased. Regular and online monitoring of the physical, chemical, and biological qualities of water and environmental parameters in such these controlled environments can be achieved by using advanced world technologies, such as autonomous boats. In this study, simulation of an autonomous boat has been done to help better understanding and control of this type of vessel in various environments such as dams, ports, rivers, aquatic ecosystems, and aquaculture. Hence, the main goal of this paper is to simulate and evaluate the guidance and navigation system of an autonomous boat based on the Fourth order of Runge-Kutta for determining the changes of water quality indices in a fish farming ponds.

Materials and Methods
In order to achieve the main goal of this study, an autonomous boat was designed and built. This boat as a general-purpose robotic trimaran boat has dimensions of 110 cm x 37 cm x40 cm and is made of Plexiglas 2 mm thick. Maximum forward speed of the boat is 125 cm s-1 (at 6850 rpm of brushless motors) and the turning radius is less than 61 cm. The environmental data can be transferred using Internet of Things (IOT), smartphones, SMS, and mini PC. The position and heading of the boat are determined using GPS and IMU data. The hydrodynamic and aerodynamic forces, moments, and coefficients of the boat model are determined and then applied in the mathematical simulation as the input of classic Runge-Kutta (RK4). The performance of the robotic boat navigational and control systems evaluated in a rectangular track with a length of 20 m and a width of 15 m in a fish farming pond in Karaj and 4 waypoints. The local coordinates of four corner of the mentioned rectangular in the pond was (0, 0), (0, 20), (15, 20), and (15, 0). The purpose of control system was to conduct the actuators in such way that boat be able to go to the next point. When the boat reaches the target distance of one m of the desired point, the next point will be introduced as a new target. The set point of boat speed was 0.4 m s-1 and zero state vector was [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. 

Results and Discussion
The maximum error of position and heading of the autonomous boat is 135 cm and 11 degrees, respectively. Also, in the speed PID controller test (40 cm s-1), the average and standard deviation of the speed calculated as 40 cm s-1 and 2 cm s-1, respectively. Maximum difference between the heading obtained from the Kalman filter and received from the GPS is 11 degrees. In some situations that high precision of heading angle is not required, the GPS data can provide such accuracy of the heading. Among the variables of longitudinal, latitude, time to reach the target area, yaw rate, heading, and forward speed the minimum and maximum of percentage error are related to forward speed and yaw rate, respectively. These values show good performance of the simulated model and PID controllers.

Conclusion
In this study, motion simulation and evaluation of a robotic boat was carried out using a model boat and MATLAB software. The mathematical model simulated the real boat behavior correctly and the boat can be used safely in fish farming ponds to monitor environmental conditions and water quality.

Keywords

Open Access

©2020 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

1. Escudier, M. 2018. Introduction to engineering fluid mechanics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Goli, H., S. Minaee, A. Jafari, A. Keyhani, A. Hajiahmad, H. Abdolmaleki, and A. Mohammad Borghaee. 2014. Comparison of four different methods for agricultural positioning using GPS and IMU. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 4 (2): 285-95. (In Farsi).
3. Im, N. K., and V. S. Nguyen. 2017. Artificial neural network controller for automatic ship berthing using head-up coordinate system. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering.
4. Kaizu, Y., M. Iio, H. Yamada, and N. Noguchi. 2011. Development of unmanned airboat for water-quality mapping. Biosystems Engineering 109 (4): 338-47.
5. Kreyszig, E., H. Kreyszig, and E. J. Norminton. 2011. Advanced engineering mathematics, Wiley, [Hoboken, NJ].
6. Lee, S. D., C. H. Yu, K. Y. Hsiu, Y. F. Hsieh, C. Y. Tzeng, and Y. Z. Kehr. 2010. Design and experiment of a small boat track-keeping autopilot. Ocean Engineering 37 (2): 208-17.
7. Li, C. Y., and E. Weeks. 2009. Measurements of a small scale eddy at a tidal inlet using an unmanned automated boat. Journal of Marine Systems 75 1-2: 150-62.
8. Melo, M., F. Mota, V. Albuquerque, and A. Alexandria. 2019. Development of a Robotic Airboat for Online Water Quality Monitoring in Lakes. Robotics 8 1: 19.
9. Minorsky. N. 1922. Directional Stability of Automatically Steered Bodies. Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers 34 (2): 280-309.
10. Mousazadeh, H., H. Jafarbiglu, H. Abdolmaleki, E. Omrani, F. Monhaseri, M. R. Abdollahzadeh, A. Mohammadi-Aghdam, A. Kiapei, Y. Salmani-Zakaria, and A. Makhsoos. 2018. Developing a navigation, guidance and obstacle avoidance algorithm for an Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) by algorithms fusion. Ocean Engineering 159: 56-65.
11. Mousazadeh, H., H. Jafarbiglu, E. Omrani, F. Monhaseri, A. Kiapei, Y. Salmani-Zakaria, and A. Makhsoos. 2017. Experimental evaluation of a hydrography surface vehicle in four navigation modes. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 2 (2): 127-36.
12. Singh, A., M. J. Stealey, V. Chen, W. J. Kaiser, M. Batalin, Y. Lam, B. Zhang, A. Dhariwal, C. Oberg, A. Pereira, G. S. Sukhatme, B. Stauffer, Moorthi Stefanie, D. Caron, and M. Hansen. 2007. Human assisted robotic team campaigns for aquatic monitoring. Journal of Field Robotics 24 11‐12: 969-89.
13. Singh, K., J. Worley, and M. Risse. 2008. Sludge Measurement Using Global Positioning System (GPS) Enabled Sonar Equipped Airboat in a Lagoon. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24 (5): 603-09.
14. Twichell, D. C., B. D. Andrews, H. L. Edmiston, and W. R. Stevenson. 2007. Geophysical mapping of oyster habitats in a shallow estuary; Apalachicola Bay, Florida, Apalachicola Bay, Florida. U.S. Geologicaln Survey Open-File Report.
CAPTCHA Image