with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystem, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Knowledge of mechanical and viscoelastic properties of agricultural material will be helpful in the transportation and processing of these materials. Giant reed grass, also known as wild cane, is a tall, perennial, bamboo-like, grass that grows in wet areas.  The giant reed grass can flourish in a wide variety of soils, including coarse sands, gravelly soil, heavy clay, and river sediment.  This grass attains heights of 7 m and once established the stems can reach a thickness close to 3 cm.  The stems of giant reed grass are used for different purposes. Traditionally the stems are used in the villages for fencing, roofing, and producing handcrafts. The modern uses of the giant reed stems include plywood, composites panels and paper production. The giant reed stems are not uniform and are made from many nodes. The number of nodes and the distance between nodes can affect the mechanical properties of the stems. In order to attain a suitable use of the stems in various industries, the physical and mechanical properties of the stems must be determined. Knowledge of mechanical and viscoelastic properties of agricultural material will be helpful in transportation and processing of these materials. The purpose of this research was to determine some relevant mechanical properties of the stems of giant reed grass with different nodes and moisture contents.
Materials and Methods
In this research, different mechanical and viscoelastic tests were performed on the stems of cane at various levels of moisture and number of nodes. The Burger-Voigt model with different number of elements was also used to model the creep behaviors of the stems. The cane stems were cut and divided to three groups of two, four, and six-node stems. The moisture contents of the stems were adjusted to three levels of 30, 40 and 50% (w.b.). After preparing the stems the mechanical tests were performed using an Instron testing machine with a three-point support. The creep tests were done by hanging a 10 kg weight at the middle of each stem. The experiments were done using factorial tests based on completely randomized design. The Young module, toughness, and the yield points of the stems were measured by the three-point method. These parameters were obtained from the stress-strain curves of the three-point compression bending tests. The results showed that the Young module was affected by both moisture and the number of nodes, but there were no interaction effects. The creeps of the stems under 10 kg loading were modeled using 3 to 5 elements Burger-Voigt models. In these models a combination of springs and dashpots are used to represent the stems. The curve fitting was performed using the MATLAB software and the goodness of fitness was verified using the fitted curves and calculating the coefficient of determinations.
Results and Discussion
The results by investigating the graphs and the ANOVA tests showed that the Young module was significantly affected by both moisture and the number of nodes. The obtained Young module for cane stem ranged from 572-1268 MPa. Both yield point and toughness were affected by both moisture and the number of nodes and their values were 65-250 N and 0.016-0.132 J.m-3, respectively. The creep test results indicated that the maximum deformation and maximum time for of the interaction of the two factors was insignificant. The maximum deformations ranged from 2.1-42.5 mm, and the maximum time for reaching the final deformation was 12.5-75 minutes for various moistures and the number of nodes combinations and showed that the 5-element Burger was best for explaining the viscoelastic behavior of cane stems (R2>0.97).
Conclusion
In this research, some mechanical properties of the giant reed grass stems were measured and the creep behavior of the stem was modeled using 3-5 elements Burger-Voigt models. The results indicated a decrease in the Young module of the stems with increase with moisture content and increase in the Young module with increase in the number of nodes. On the other hand, the elongation of the stems increased with both number of the nodes and the level of moisture. The 5-element Burger-Voigt model was best fitted to the creep data.

Keywords

Open Access

©2020 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

1. Ahmad, M., and F. Kamke. 2005. Analysis of Calcutta bamboo for structural composite materials: physical and mechanical properties. Wood Science and Technology 39: 448-459.
2. Allen, H. G. 2013. Analysis and Design of Structural Sandwich Panels: The Commonwealth and International Library: Structures and Solid Body Mechanics Division. Elsevier.
3. Chung, K., and W. Yu. 2002. Mechanical properties of structural bamboo for bamboo scaffoldings. Engineering Structures 24: 429-442.
4. Diehl, K., and D. Hamann. 1980. Relationship between sensory profile parameters and fundamental mechanical parameters for raw potatoes. Journal of Texture Studies 10: 401-420.
5. Esehaghbeygi, A., B. Hoseinzadeh, M. Khazaei, and A. Masoumi. 2009. Bending and shearing properties of wheat stem of alvand variety. World Applied Sciences Journal 6: 1028-1032.
6. Galedar, M. N., A. Tabatabaeefar, A. Jafari, A. Sharifi, and S. Rafiee. 2008. Bending and shearing characteristics of alfalfa stems. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.
7. Gottron, J., K. A. Harries, and Q. Xu. 2014. Creep behaviour of bamboo. Construction and Building Materials 66: 79-88.
8. Hering, S., and P. Niemz. 2012. Moisture-dependent, viscoelastic creep of European beech wood in longitudinal direction. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 70: 667-670.
9. Hernandez-Estrada, Z., J. Figueroa, P. Rayas-Duarte, and R. Peña. 2012. Viscoelastic characterization of glutenins in wheat kernels measured by creep tests. Journal of Food Engineering 113: 19-26.
10. Hoseinzadeh, B., and A. Shirneshan. 2012. Bending and shearing characteristics of canola stem. American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences 12: 275-281.
11. Jakovljević, S., and D. Lisjak. 2019. Investigation into the effects of humidity on the mechanical and physical properties of bamboo. Construction and Building Materials 194: 386-396.
12. Lam, P., S. Sokhansanj, X. Bi, C. Lim, L. Naimi, M. Hoque, S. Mani, A. R. Womac, S. Narayan, and X. Ye. 2008. Bulk density of wet and dry wheat straw and switchgrass particles. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24: 351-358.
13. Lord Jr, A. E. 2003. Viscoelasticity of the giant reed material Arundo donax. Wood Science and Technology 37: 177-188.
14. Lowe, S., M. Browne, S. Boudjelas, and M. De Poorter. 2000. 100 of the world's worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group Auckland,, New Zealand.
15. Nadim, Z., and E. Ahmadi. 2016. Rheological properties of strawberry fruit coating with methylcellulose. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 6: 153-162.in farsi
16. Nikrai, J., S. K. Najafi, and G. Ebrahimi. 2010. A comparative study on creep behavior of wood flour-polypropylene composite, medium density fiberboard (MDF) and particleboard. Science and Technology 22: 363-371.
17. Obataya, E., P. Kitin, and H. Yamauchi. 2007. Bending characteristics of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) with respect to its fiber–foam composite structure. Wood Science and Technology 41: 385-400.
18. Oka, G. M., A. Triwiyono, A. Awaludin, and S. Siswosukarto. 2014. Effects of node, internode and height position on the mechanical properties of Gigantochloa atroviolacea bamboo. Procedia Engineering 95: 31-37.
19. Spatz, H.-C., H. Beismann, A. Emanns, and T. Speck. 1995. Mechanical anisotropy and inhomogeneity in the tissues comprising the hollow stem of the giant reed Arundo donax. Biomimetics (USA).
20. Spatz, H.-C., H. Beismann, F. Brüchert, A. Emanns, and T. Speck. 1997. Biomechanics of the giant reed Arundo donax. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 352: 1-10.
21. Tagne, N. S., D. Ndapeu, D. Nkemaja, G. Tchemou, D. Fokwa, W. Huisken, E. Njeugna, M. Fogue, J.-Y. Drean, and O. Harzallah. 2018. Study of the viscoelastic behaviour of the Raffia vinifera fibres. Industrial Crops and Products 124: 572-581.
22. Xu, Y.-L., S.-B. Xiong, Y.-B. Li, and S.-M. Zhao. 2008. Study on creep properties of indica rice gel. Journal of Food Engineering 86: 10-16.
23. Zhong-Zhen, S., J. Huan-Xin, C. He-Ping, Y. Qiu-Sheng, L. Li-Xin, W. Li, and C. Guo-Lin. 2013. The Viscoelasticity Model of Corn Straw under the Different Moisture Contents. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
CAPTCHA Image