with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Too many people are working in the agricultural sector and therefore, pay more attention to the safety and health at work in the agricultural sector is important. This issue is more important in developing industrial countries where the level of the ergonomic working condition is less than that of developed countries. Attention to ergonomic condition of agricultural machinery drivers is one of the goals of agricultural mechanization. Therefore, in this study the ergonomic conditions of brake and accelerator mechanisms for MF285 and MF399 tractor's drivers were investigated using a new method. Materials and Methods: 25 people were selected for experiment. The electrical activity of Medialis gastrocnemius, Lateralis gastrocnemius, Vastus medialis, Vastus lateralis, Quadratus Lumborum and Trapezius muscles of drivers before and during pressing the pedal and after rest time were recorded using Biovision device. Measurements were performed for each person on each muscle 30 seconds before pressing the pedal, 60 seconds after pressing the pedal and after 60 seconds of rest. For all drivers, the muscles on the right side (brake and accelerator side) have been selected and tested. The measurements were performed in compliance with appropriate time intervals between the measurements. Results and Discussion: Ergonomic assessment of brake pedal: The results showed that the RMS electrical activity of muscles of Vastus medialis and Medial gastrocnemius, during 60 seconds braking were 2.47 and 1.97. So, Vastus medialis and Medial gastrocnemius had the highest stress during pressing the MF399 tractor's brake pedal. Moreover, the Medial gastrocnemius and Lateral gastrocnemius with RMS electrical activity ratio of 2.47 and 1.74 had the highest RMS electrical activity ratio respectively, during 60 seconds braking compared to before braking of MF285 tractor. The comparison of results showed that the Vastus medialis and Trapezius had the higher stress during braking of MF285 tractor than that of MF399 tractor, while, muscles of Medialis gastrocnemius, Lateralis gastrocnemius, Vastus lateralis, Trapezius and Quadratus Lumborum showed the lower stress during braking of MF285 tractor. Ergonomic assessment of accelerator: During 60 seconds pressing the accelerator pedal for MF285 the RMS electrical activity of muscles of Quadratus Lumborum and Medialis gastrocnemius were 3.25 and 2.15. So, these muscles had the highest stress during pressing the accelerator pedal for MF285. Drivers of MF399 tractor experienced high stress in their Vastus lateralis and Lateralis gastrocnemius muscles during pressing the accelerator pedal. The results highlighted that for all muscles, except Vastus lateralis, the electrical activity ratio during pressing the accelerator pedal of MF285 tractor were higher than that for MF399 tractor. Conclusions: To conclude, Vastus medialis and Trapezius had the higher stress during braking of MF285 tractor than that of MF399 tractor, while, muscles of Medialis gastrocnemius, Lateralis gastrocnemius, Vastus lateralis, Trapezius and Quadratus Lumborum showed the lower stress during braking of MF285 tractor as compared with the other model of tractor. Generally in all muscles, except Vastus lateralis, the electrical activity ratio during pressing the accelerator pedal of MF285 tractor was higher than that for MF399 tractor and the drivers need more effort while pressing the accelerator pedal and drivers of this tractor had adverse condition while using the accelerator mechanism. Acknowledgements: The research leading to these results has received funding from the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, is gratefully acknowledged. Gratitude also goes to Dr. Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard, Hossein Fallahi and Mehdi Mahjour for their guidance and support throughout parts of this research.

Keywords

1. Aghazadeh, J., M. Ghaderi, M. R. Azghani, H. R. Khalkhali, T. Allahyari, and I. Mohebi. 2014. Anti-fatigue floor mat: an ergonomic solution for alleviating low back pain associated with prolonged. The Journal of Urmia University of Medical Sciences 24 (12): 942-955. (In Farsi).
2. Agriculture Jihad Mechanization Development Center (AJMDC). 2012. Available from http://www.ajmdc.ir. (In Farsi).
3. Anderson, E. A., L. I. Oddsson, H. Grundstrom, J. Nilsson, and A. Thorstensson. 1996. EMG activities of the quadrates lumborum and erector spinae muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks. Clin biomech 11: 392-400.
4. Anonymous, Iran Tractor Manufacturing Company, 2012. Available from http://www.itm.co.ir/.
5. Anonymous, Seniam, 2014. Available from http://seniam.org/sensor_location.htm.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U. S. Department of Labor; 2011. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2010. Available from: www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. U. S. Department of Labor; 2012. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away fromwork, 2011. Available from: www.bls.gov/iif/oshcdnew.htm.
8. Dehghan, N., A. Choobineh, M. Razeghi, J. Hasanzadeh, and M. Irandoost. 2014. Designing a new computer mouse and evaluating some of its functional parameters. Journal of Research in Health Sciences (2): 132-145.
9. Fallahi, H., M. H. Abbaspour-Fard, A. Azhari, M. Khojastehpour, and A. Nikkhah. 2013. Comparison of Applied Forces on Selective Joints and Muscles of Drivers during Clutching of MF285 and MF399 Tractors. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 5 (1): 163-171.
10. Fathallah, F. A. 2010. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. Applied Ergonomics 41 (6): 738-743.
11. Goglia, V., Z. Gospodaric, D. Filipovic, and I. Djukic. 2006. Influence on operator's health of hand-transmitted vibrationsfrom handles of a single-axle tractor. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 13: 33-38.
12. Holpp, M., M. Kroulik, Z. T. Anken, M. Sauter, and O. Hensel. 2013. Large-scale field evaluation of driving performance and ergonomic effects of satellite-based guidance systems. Biosystems Engineering 116: 190-197.
13. Bao, S., B. Silverstein, and M. Cohen. 2001. An electromyography study in three high risk poultry processing jobs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27: 375-385.
14. Jaworowska, A., and G. Bazylak. 2009. An outbreak of body weight dissatisfaction associated with self-perceived BMI and dieting among female pharmacy students. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 63: 679-692.
15. Koleini-Mamaghani, N., A. H. Bakhtiary, E. Sevan, and H. Sadeghi-Naeini. 2012. Ergonomics evaluation of new home stripper using electromyography. Iran Occupational Health 9 (2) 59-67. (In Farsi).
16. Kumar, S., and A. Mital. 1996. Electromyography in Ergonomics: Taylor & Francis Group 112.
17. Mahdavi, N., M. Motamedzade, A. Jamshidi, A. Moghimbeigi, A. Heidari, and R. Moghaddam. 2013. Objective and subjective assessment of upper trapezious muscle fatigue in carpet weaving workers. Tkj 5 (3): 20-29.
18. Mazidi, M., M. H. Abaspour-Fard, and M. H. Aghkhani. 2014. The feasibility of unmanned tractor guidance based on wireless video transmission. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 4 (2): 166-175. (In Farsi).
19. Mehta, C. R., P. S. Tiwari Rokade, M. M. Pandey, S. C. Pharade, L. P. Gite, and S. B. Yadav. 2007. Leg strength of Indian operators in the operation of tractor pedals. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37: 283-289.
20. Mehta, C. R., M. Shyam, P. Singh, and R. N. Verma. 2000. Ride vibration on tractor-implement system. Applied Ergonomics 31: 323-328.
21. Nikkhah, A., Z. Kougir-Chegini, A. Kosari-Moghadam, and S. H. Payman. 2014. Musculoskeletal disorders, energy use and costs of human labor in Rice farming in Guilan Province. The 8th National Congress on Agr. Machinery Eng. (Biosystem) & Mechanization, 29-31 January, Mashhad, Iran. (In Farsi).
22. Ojha, P., and S. Kwatra. 2012. An Ergonomic Study on Human Drudgery and Musculoskeletal Disorders by Rice Transplanting. Stud Home Com Sci 6 (1): 15-20.
23. Patel, R., A. Kumar, and D. Mohan. 2000. Development of an ergonomic evaluation facility for Indian tractors. Applied Ergonomics 31: 311-316.
24. Pheasant, S. T., and C. M. Harris. 1982. Human strength in the operation of tractor pedals. Ergonomics 25: 53-63.
25. Wang, X., R. Pannetier, N. Burra, and J. Numa. 2011. A biomechanical approach for evaluating motion related discomfort: Illustration by an Application to Pedal Clutching Movement. pp 210-219 in Duffy V, ed. Digital Human Modeling, vol. 6777 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
CAPTCHA Image