with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
The dynamic response of soil on tillage tools, is an important factor in determining their performance. For a tractor with a certain size, a reduction in draft force, the working width and speed of tools can rise and result in increasing performance and reduce costs. Researches carried out in order to reduce the draft force led to design and build new tillage tools called Bent Leg and Parra plows. The dual bent blade sub-surface tillage tool was built and examined inspired by the shape of a bent leg. The researches indicated that the combination of a dual bent blade sub-surface tillage tool and chisel plow could be used in order to reduce draft force, loosen the seed bed by the chisel plow and wings, increase in soil disturbance area by the wings, and create a suitable space for root growth by chisel plow. Since the fuel consumption and traction power of tractor are the limiting factors for pulling tools in the soil. The rake angle of tillage tools is the penetration factor of the tools to the soil. It is necessary to determine the optimized rake and bend angles according to their effect on draft force and better penetration in soil. In this research, the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was utilized to determine the optimized points of wing geometry of winged chisel plow in order to minimize the draft and vertical forces of tillage tool.
Materials and Methods
Using the properties of dual bent blade subsurface tillage implement and chisel plow, the winged chisel plow was designed by Catia V5R20 software and was built in the workshop of mechanics of biosystems engineering department at Shiraz University. The effect of three factors of working depth of wing (5, 10, and 15 cm), bend angle (10, 20, and 30 degree), and rake angle (7.5, 15, and 22.5 degree) were analyzed on draft and vertical forces of wined chisel plow in soil bin of Karaj Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. The length, width, and depth of the soil bin were 24 m, 1.7 m, and 1 m, respectively. The most important issue was to study the main effects and interactions of factors. So, the Response Surface Methodology was selected. With the help of this statistical design, the numbers of experiments were reduced and all coefficients of quadratic regression and interaction factors were estimated. The experiments were conducted based on the central composite design considering three main surface including central and axial points for each factors. For each response the quadratic polynomial models were obtained using the multiple linear regression.
Results and Discussion
The results indicated that fitted quadratic model for draft force corresponded with the experimental data by determination coefficient of up to 94% (R2 ˃ 0.94). Increasing the depth of wing, the contact with loosened soil decreased that led to failure in unloosened soil around the chisel blade and increase in pressure to the blade. The results showed that the effect of bend angle was significant on draft force and increasing the bend angle, the tip of wing located in deeper place so, the draft force was increased that was in line with previous researches. The effect of rake angle was not significant on the draft force and its effect on the model was positive and negligible which was reported positive and significant in previous works. The fitted quadratic model for vertical force corresponded with the test data by determination coefficient of up to 93% (R2 ˃ 0.93). The effects of wing depth and bend angle were positively significant on the vertical force of the tool but the effect of rake angle was negligible. The increase in vertical force with increasing bend angle was further in deeper wing position. However, the impact of rake angle was seen in vertical force and the effect of bend angle was not significant in vertical force in rake angles of 7.5° and 15°, but it was significant in rake angle of 22.5°.
Conclusion
The draft and vertical forces were determined 3.43 and 1.31 kN, respectively, at optimum condition (wing depth of 5cm, bend angle of 11.1°, and rake angle of 19.46°). The proposed model to predict the dependent variables were very close to the results of obtained experimental findings. The wing depth and bend angle had positive and significant effects on draft and vertical forces but the effect of rake angle was positive and insignificant on both measured traits.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Al-Janobim, A. A., M. F. Wahby, A. M. Aboukarima, and S. A. Al-Hamed. 2002. Influence of chisel plow shank shape on horizontal and vertical force requirements. Agricultural Sciences 7 (1): 13-19.
2. Aluko, O. B., and D. A. Seig. 2000. An experimental investigation of the characteristics of and conditions for brittle fracture in two-dimensional soil cutting. Soil and Tillage Research 57: 143-157.
3. Arvidsson, J., and O. Hillerström. 2010. Specific draught, soil fragmentation and straw incorporation for different tine and share types. Soil and Tillage Research 110 (1): 154-160.
4. Bas, D., H. Boyaci, and H. Smail. 2007. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering 78 (3): 836-845.
5. Durairaj, C. D., and M. Balasubramanian. 1997. Influence of tool angles and speed on the soil reactions of a bent leg plough in two soils. Soil and Tillage Research 44: 137-150.
6. Esehaghbeygi, A., A. Tabatabaeefar, A. R. Keyhani, and M. H. Raoufat. 2005. Depth and rake angle’s influence on the draft force of an oblique blade subsoiler. Iran Agricultural Science 36 (4) 1045–1052. (In Farsi).
7. Fielke, J. M. 1996. Interactions of the cutting edge of tillage implements with soil. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 63 (1): 61-72.
8. Glancey, J. L., S. K. Upadhyaya, W. J. Chancellor, and J. W. Rumsey. 1996. Prediction of agricultural implement draft using an instrumented analog tillage tool. Soil and Tillage Research 37: 47-65.
9. Godwin, R. J. 1975. An extended octagonal ring transducer for use in tillage studies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 20 (4): 347-352.
10. Harrison, H. P. 1988. Soil reacting forces for a bent leg plow. Transactions of the ASAE 31 (1): 47-51.
11. Harrison, H. P., and Z. J. Licsko. 1989. Soil reacting forces for models of three bent leg plows. Soil and Tillage Research 15 (1-2): 125-135.
12. Horuz, E., A. Altan, and M. Maskan. 2012. Spray drying and process optimization of unclarified pomegranate (Punica granatum) juice. Drying Technology 30 (7): 787-798.
13. Hosseini, S. A., and S. H. Karparvarfard. 2012. A prediction of forces acting on chisel plow tine through dimensional analysis method. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering 43 (1): 93-103. (In Farsi).
14. Kargozari, M., S. Moini, and Z. Emam Djomeh. 2010. Prediction of some physical properties of osmodehydratied carrot cubes using response surface methodology. Journal of food processing and preservation 34: 1041-1063.
15. Khalilian, A., T. H. Garner, H. L. Musen, R. B. Dodd, and S. A. Hale. 1988. Energy for conservation tillage in coastal plain soils. Transactions of the ASAE 31 (5): 1333-1337.
16. Majidi Iraj, H., and M. H. Raoufat. 1997. Power requirement of a bent leg plow and its effects on soil physical conditions. Iran Agricultural Research 16 (1): 1-16.
17. McKyes, E., and J. Maswaure. 1997. Effect of design parameters of flat tillage tools on loosening of clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research 43 (3): 195-204.
18. Osman, M. S. 1964. The mechanics of soil cutting blades. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 9: 313-328.
19. Payne, P. C. J., and D. W. Tanner. 1959. The relationship between rake angle and the performance of simple cultivation implements. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 4 (4): 312-325.
20. Salar, M. R. 2011. Design, Development and Evaluation of Double Bent-Blade Sub-Surface Tillage Tool for Conservation Tillage. Faculty of Agriculture. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. (In Farsi).
21. Salar, M. R., A. Esehaghbeygi, and A. Hemmat. 2013. Soil loosening characteristics of a dual bent blade subsurface tillage implement. Soil and Tillage Research 134: 17-24.
22. Shen, J., and L. R. Kushwaha. 1998. Soil–machine interaction: a finite element perspective. Marcel Dekker.
23. Summers, J. D., A. Khalilian, and D. G. Batchelder. 1986. Draft relationships for primary tillage in Oklahama soils. Transactions of the ASAE 29 (1): 37-39.
24. Wolf, D., T. H. Garner, and J. W. Davis. 1981. Tillage mechanical energy input and soil crop response. Transactions of the ASAE 24 (6): 1412-1419.
CAPTCHA Image