with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Document Type : Short Paper

Authors

Dept. of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Drying process of agricultural products, fruits and vegetables are highly energy demanding and hence are the most expensive postharvest operation. Nowadays, the application of control systems in different area of science and engineering plays a key role and is considered as the important and inseparable parts of any industrial process. The review of literature indicates that enormous efforts have been donefor the intelligent control of solar driers and in this regard some simulation models are used through computer programming. However, because of the effect of air velocity on the inlet air temperature in dryers, efforts have been made to control the fan speed based ont he temperature of the absorber plate in this study, and the behavior of this system was compared with an ordinary dryer without such a control system.
Materials and methods: In this study, acabinet type solar dryer with forced convection and 5kg capacity of fresh herbs was used. The dryer was equipped with a fan in the outlet chamber (the chimney) for creating air flow through the dryer. For the purpose of research methods and automatic control of fan speed and for adjusting the temperature of the drying inlet air, a control system consisting of a series of temperature and humidity sensors and a microcontroller was designed. To evaluatethe effect of the system with fan speed control on the uniformity of air temperature in the drying chamber and hence the trend of drying process in the solar dryer, the dryer has been used with two different modes: with and without the control of fan speed, each in twodays (to minimize the errors) of almost the same ambient temperature. The ambient air temperature during the four days of experiments was obtained from the regional Meteorological Office. Some fresh mint plants (Mentha longifolia) directly harvested from the farm in the morning of the experiment days were used as the drying materials. Each experimental run continued for 9 hours, startingat 8:00 am and terminating at 17:00. To determine the moisture content for the purpose of observing and recording the drying process, the drying materials were sampled with one hour time step. The moisture contentwas determinedin the laboratory using the well- known method of oven drying which is presented elsewhere.
Results and discussion: Since the ambient air temperature during the four days of experimental runs was almost the same, the effect of ambient air temperature on the drying process was ignored. Considering the dryer inlet air temperature charts obtained in this study (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3), it can be concluded that for those tests using the fan speed control system, the outlet air temperature of the collector during drying period associated with very little variations, is compared with the no control mode runs. At the beginning of the day and also during the hours at the end of the day, due to a decrease in the temperature of the absorber plate compared to the middle of theday, the fan speed is reduced as air passes slowly through the absorber plate and hence the temperature rises. But in the middle of the day, with increasing the temperature of absorber plate, the speed of the fan is increased to provide sufficient airflow and to prevent the absorber plate from warming up. Inexperiments without fan speed control, the fan works with no limitation, and the temperature of the inlet air was changed with the temperature change in the absorber plate. The fan speed control system in addition to lowering the temperature changes in the outlet air, also increased the average outlet temperature about 3C, compared to the dryer without such a control system. During the twodays of experiments, the average ambient air temperature was 28C and at the sametime the outlet air temperature was 40.6 and 40.8C, respectively. In twodays of no control system, the average temperature of the ambient air was 28.5 and 28C and at the sametime the outlet air temperature was 38 and 37.8C, respectively. The results showed that with fan speed control mode the variation of inlet air temperature of the drying chamber was more limited and remained within the range of 39 to 42 and 40 to 42°C during the two experimental days, respectively. However, without fan speed control, the system exhibited a wider variation of inlet drying air temperature and limited within the range of 33 to 44 and 32 to 43°C. Furthermore, with fan speed control in a solar dryer, along with more uniformity in moisture content, the drying rate may speed up and with further decrease in final moisture content up to 8%, when compared to a system with no fan speed control.
Conclusions: The average temperatures of the outlet air of collector in two days with fan speed control system, were 40.6 and 40.8°C while in the system without the fan speed control, were 38 and 37.8, respectively. This clearly indicates that the system control could increase the temperature of the collector outlet. The dryer was also able to control the fan speed during the 9hours of drying mint with initial moisture content of 85% (w.b) and to reduce it to about 24.5 and 25.5%, during the two experimental days, respectively. While the corresponding values without the use of a control system were 33.5 and 33.5%, respectively. In other words, in the experiments with the use of control system, the final moisture content was about 8% lower than the moisture content of materials dried without such a system. Furthermore, the control system reduces the volume of air required by the system and hence speeds up the drying process.

Keywords

1. Bruce, D. M., and N. J. B. Mcfarlane. 1992. Control of mixed-flow grain dryers: Testing of a feedback-plus-feed forward algorithm. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 52: 11-23.
2. Bruce, D. M., and N. J. B. Mcfarlane. 1993. Control of mixed - flow grain dryers: An improved feed back-plus-feed forward algorithm. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 56 (3): 225-238.
3. Gates, R. S., K. Chao, and N. Sigramis. 1999. Fuzzy control simulation of plant and animal environments. ASAE Paper No, 993-196.
4. Karim, M. A., and M. N. A. Hawlader. 2004. Development of solar air collectors for drying applications. Energy Conversion and Management 45: 329-344.
5. Perez-Correa, J. R., F. Cubillos, E. Zavala, C. Shene, and P. I. Álvarez. 1998. Dynamic simulation and control of direct rotary dryers. Food Control 9 (4): 195-203.
6. Qiang, L., and F. W. Bakker-Arkema. 2001. A Model-predictive controller for grain drying. Journal of Food Engineering 49 (4): 321-326.
7. Ryniecki, A., and M. E. Nellist. 1990. Optimization of control systems for near-ambient grain drying: Part 2, the optimizing simulations. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 48: 19-35.
8. Smitabhindua, R., S. Janjaib, and V. Chankong. 2007. Optimization of a solar-assisted drying system for drying bananas. Renewable Energy 33 (7): 1523-1531
9. Temple, S. J., and A. J. B. Van Boxtel. 2001. Control of fluid bed tea dryer: Design of controller and tuning. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 26 (2): 159-170.
10. Zomorodian, A. A., and J. L. Woods. 2003. Modeling and testing a new once-through air solar energy collector. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 5:11-19.
CAPTCHA Image