with the collaboration of Iranian Society of Mechanical Engineers (ISME)

Evaluation of the Effects of Soil Moisture and Vibration Frequency on the Performance Indices of an Electric Vibratory Subsoiler

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

2 Agricultural Mechanization and Industries Development Center, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Introduction
Soil compaction causes a decrease in water and air penetration into the soil, impairs root development, and consequently leads to a substantial decline in crop yield. The most rapid countermeasure is subsoiling. Subsoiler devices and the subsoiling operation are recognised among the most energy-consuming and heaviest soil tillage operations. Tillage tool vibration effectively reduces traction force, resulting in increased soil fracturing and mixing, which decreases soil adhesion. The objective of this research is to determine the optimal vibration frequency for an electrical oscillating subsoiler. This will lead to a modification of the conventional subsoiling process and the application of these research findings in routine agricultural subsoiling operations, particularly in the lands managed by the Khuzestan Sugarcane Development Company. Improving this operation can significantly reduce soil losses, energy consumption, and associated costs, given the vast annual volume and area involved.
Material and Methods
This research is a developmental and applied type. It contains the installation of an electric oscillation system, followed by the execution of treatments utilising the independent variables of the study, which consist of the vibration frequency of the subsoiler blade at five levels (0, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Hz) and soil moisture content at two levels, dry (5.5–5.8%) and moist (15–19%). The vibration generation system installed on the subsoiler consisted of two electrical circuits: one for supplying electrical energy from the tractor’s battery, and another for adjusting the vibration acceleration. This alteration was achieved by modifying the rotational speed of the vibrator motor, which, in turn, changed the frequency. The highest frequency of 50 Hz and the absence of vibrations could be achieved using the F300-2R2G-2 model of a programmable inverter drive, which supportsn both manual and automatic control. The five frequency levels, ranging from 0 to 50 Hz, were generated by the driver from within the tractor cabin, in accordance with the experimental design. The required electrical energy was also continuously supplied without fluctuations or interruption. The experiments were conducted in a pre-divided and prepared field, with three replications, utilising the experimental design of split-plots in the form of completely randomised blocks. Data obtained from the tests, including traction force, working width, working depth, and the cross-sectional area of the tilled soil, were compiled and statistically analysed using Excel and SAS software.
Results and Discussion
The results indicated that at high moisture levels, the working depth increased, while the working width and the effectiveness of the vibratory subsoiler decreased. Vibration levels at the 0.01 significance level had a significant impact on performance indicators, including working width, working depth, the cross-sectional area of tilled soil, and specific traction force. Under conditions of minimum moisture and maximum vibration, the highest effectiveness was achieved, meaning that the width, working depth, and disturbed soil area increased, while the specific traction force decreased. The maximum traction force occurred at the lowest frequency and under dry soil conditions. Therefore, in subsoiling operations, selecting a time when the soil is within the suitable moisture range and utilising higher frequencies of vibration leads to a larger area of disturbed and fractured soil. Additionally, a reduction in the required specific traction force further enhances the efficiency of the vibratory subsoiler.
Conclusion
The electric vibration system offers an innovative solution for vibration management and control by the operator. It offers a wider range for achieving optimal vibration in soils of varying textures, thereby maximising the efficiency of the tractor-tiller system. The application of variable-rate vibration enables electrification and is independent of the PTO.

Keywords

Subjects

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

1.       Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., & Sedghi, R. (2015). Predicting soil fragmentation during tillage operation using fuzzy logic approach. Journal of Terramechanics, 57, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2014.12.002
2.       Abbaspour Gilandeh, Y., Ahani, M., Askari Asli Ardeh, E., Rasooli Sharabiani, V., & Sofalian, O. (2010). Design, fabrication and evaluation of a tractor-mounted soil cone penetrometer with multiple probes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 11(1), 19-34. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26454531.1389.11.1.2.1
3.       Ahmadi, I. (2017). Evaluation of a chisel plow draft force and power estimation as based on the required mechanical laws. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering (Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences), 47(4), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2017.60256
4.       Al-Rajabo, S., Hilal, Y. Y., & Rajab, R. H. (2021). Investigation on the application of subsoiler vibration to reduce the energy requirement. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 653, No. 1, p. 012040). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/653/1/012040
5.       Ariz, A., & Safir Zadeh, S. (2021). Comparison of the efficiency of three types of subsoiler on the soil of sugar cane. Iranian Journal of Promotional Science Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 11(56), 31-39. [in Persian].
6.       Andekaeizadeh, K., Sheikhdavoodi, M. J., & Khorasani Fardavani, M. E. (2017). The selection of best tillage implements in terms of energy use efficiency using simple additive weighting methodology. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 7(1), 37-47. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v7i1.48464
7.       Bengough, A. G., McKenzie, B. M., Hallett, P. D., & Valentine, T. A. (2011). Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq350
8.       Croitoru, S., Vladut, V., Marin, E., Matache, M., & Dumitru, I. (2016). Determination of subsoiler's traction force influenced by different working depth and velocity. In Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development” (Vol. 15, pp. 817–825). Jelgava, Latvia.
9.       Friso, D. (2025). A study of forced vibrations with nonlinear springs and dry friction: Application to a mechanical oscillator with very large vibrating blades for soil cutting. Vibration, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration8010010
10.   Ghasemi Abdoalmalaki, Y., Ghajar Sepanlou, M., & Bahmanyar, M. A. (2015). Effects of different methods of tillage on some physical characteristics of soil. Iranian Journal of Soil Research, 29(3), 309-320. [in Persian].  https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22287124.1394.29.3.6.8
11.   Goudarzi, B., Kazemi, N., & Asoodar, M. A. (2021). Effect of rotary vibration by electric power, on tillage performance and efficiency of subsoiler. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research, 22(78), 19-38. https://amsr.areeo.ac.ir/article_123112.html
12.   Gowripathi Rao, N. R. N. V., Chaudhary, H., & Sharma, A. K. (2019). Optimal design and analysis of oscillatory mechanism for agricultural tillage operation. SN Applied Sciences, 1(9), 1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1025-z
13.   Gunn, J. T., & Tramontini, V. N. (1955). Oscillation of tillage implements. Agricultural Engineering, 36(11), 725-729.
14.   Hamzeh Dost, M., Mirabzadeh, A., Zarei, S., & Haji Sharfi, H. (2016). Irrigation water volume delivery and flow rate measurement in sugarcane farms: Case study of Amir Kabir Sugarcane Production and Industry [Conference presentation]. 5th National Conference on Management of Irrigation and Drainage Networks and 3rd National Irrigation and Drainage Congress of Iran, Ahvaz, Iran. [in Persian].
15.   Hemmat, A., Sadegh Nejad, H., & Ali Moradi, R. (2000). Draft of vibrating-share subsoiler in vibrating and non-vibrating mods and its effect on soil physical properties. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(1), 127-146. [in Persian]. https://jijas.ut.ac.ir/article_17189
16.   Kanyawi, N., & Shahgholi, G. (2018). Modeling the effect of different oscillation angles on the oscillatory tine performance using Discrete Element Method. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 49(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2018.216690.664853
17.   Kazemi, N., & Jafari, S. (2024). Study of some Soil Physical Characteristics and Soil Compaction Using Accurate Measuring Machine and Optimizing Subsoiling Operations in Sugarcane Fields: A Precision Agriculture Approach. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization, 9(2), 1-15. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/jam.2024.59356.1263
18.   Li, X., Fu, J., Zhang, D., Cui, T., & Zhang, R. (2012). Experiment analysis on traction resistance of vibration subsoiler. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.01.007
19.   Mahohi, A., & Khatinzade, H. A. (2021). Evaluation of subsoiling depth of fields of ratoon cane on some soil and plant indices. Applied Soil Research, 9(3), 134-146. [in Persian].
20.   Osman, A. N., & Zhang, D. (2013). An oscillating and non-oscillating subsoiler shanks and their influence on traction resistance and soil properties. In 2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21-July 24, 2013. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.20131602809
21.   Oyebode, O. O., Andoniaina, R. M., & Shoji, K. (2021). Draft reduction without increase in power requirement using a vertically oscillating model subsoiler. Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Machinery and Food Engineers, 83(5), 361-368. https://doi.org/10.11357/jsamfe.83.5_361
22.   Raoufat, M. H., & Kazemi Najafabadi, M. (2007). Performance of a bentleg subsoiler with shallow tines in a clay soil. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Techniques and Natural Resources (JWSS), 11(41), 117-129. [in Persian]. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24763594.1386.11.41.10.2
23.   Sasaki, C. M., de Moraes Gonçalves, J. L., & da Silva, Á. P. (2007). Ideal subsoiling moisture content of Latosols used in forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 243(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.024
24.   Salahloo, M., Mohammadi Alasti, B., Mardani, A., & Abbasgholipour, M. (2021). Effect of forward speed, working depth and overlay parameters of cultivator tillage on power consumption and draft force. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 51(4), 749-756. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijbse.2020.295901.665265
25.   Sivarajan, S., Maharlooei, M., Bajwa, S. G., & Nowatzki, J. (2018). Impact of soil compaction due to wheel traffic on corn and soybean growth, development and yield. Soil and Tillage Research, 175, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.001
26.   Soeharsono, P., & Setiawan, R. A. (2010). Analytical study of self-excited vibration on single degree of freedom vibratory-tillage. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5(6), 61-66.
27.   Stoss, K. J., Sobotzik, J., Shi, B., & Kreis, E. R. (2013). Tractor power for implement operation—Mechanical, hydraulic, and electrical: An overview (ASABE Distinguished Lecture Series No. 37, pp. 1–25). St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
28.   Tahmasebi, M., Gohari, M., Sharifi Malvajerdi, A., & Hedayatipor, A. (2023). Development and field evaluation of a horizontal pneumatic sensor equipped with multiple nozzles for on-the-go soil mechanical strength measurement. Journal of Research in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery, 12(2), 91-101. [in Persian].  https://doi.org/10.22034/jrmam.2023.14013.609
29.   Tang, M., Li, X., Zhang, D., & Wang, W. (2015). The effects of vibrating subsoiling on tractional resistance and soil properties. In 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting (Paper No. 152188353). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.20152188353
30.   Van der Linde, J. (2007). Discrete element modeling of a vibratory subsoiler (Master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/2865
31.   Yang, P., Dong, W., Heinen, M., Qin, W., & Oenema, O. (2022). Soil compaction prevention, amelioration and alleviation measures are effective in mechanized and smallholder agriculture: A meta-analysis. Land, 11(5), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050645
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 12 September 2026

  • Receive Date 07 April 2026
  • Revise Date 18 July 2026
  • Accept Date 19 July 2026
  • First Publish Date 12 September 2026