Increasing energy efficiency by geometric modification of hoe-type furrow opener

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• R. Rahimzadeh ¹
• Y. Ajabshirchi ¹
• Sh. Abdollahpour ¹
• A. Sharifi Malvajerdi ²
• N. Sartipi ³
• A. Mohammadi ⁴

¹ Biosystems Engineering Department, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

² Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

³ Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Maragheh, Iran

⁴ Plant Breeding Department. Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v6i2.39793

Abstract

Introduction
Direct planting becomes more common in the recent years, because it conserves soil and water as well as it saves energy and time. However, this technology needs special implements such as seed planter. Given that direct planting is practiced in undisturbed lands, so it was needed to design a special furrow opener. In order to obtain a suitable furrow opener this experiment was conducted in rain-fed Agricultural Research Institute in Maragheh.
Materials and Methods
Most of seed planters that are used for cultivation in rain fed conditions are equipped by hoe-type furrow opener. Hoe-type furrow openers have good penetration in hard and dry soils. However, they do not have the ability for direct planting. Hoe-type furrow opener was chosen as a model. Then by changing the geometric form of the depth to width ratio (d/w), the two openers were designed. In the first design, which was called O1 two wings and a narrow blade acting as a coulter were added in front of the hoe-type furrow opener. In the second design, which was called O2, in addition to the O1 modification, furrow opener width was decreased and a disk blade was added for seed sowing (Fig. 1).

The performance of O1 and O2 openers were compared with the conventional hoe-type furrow opener (check) in soil bin and in field conditions. At three different forward speeds (1, 1.5 and 2 m.s-1) with 3 replications, the effects of the openers designs of vertical and horizontal soil forces were evaluated in soil-bin conditions. In order to evaluate the performance of the furrow opener in field conditions, an experiment was conducted using a split plot design based on RCBD at 4 replications. Furrow openers formed the main plots and forward speeds formed the sub plots. Each plot size was 22 meters long in two rows for each treatment. After germination of wheat crop, the numbers of seedlings in two rows were counted (along a one meter). After crop maturity, all plots were harvested by hand and grain and biological yield was measured. ANOVA test, uniformity test and mean comparison were conducted by using Genstat software.
Results and Discussion
The soil bin test results showed that opener design and forward speed both have significant influences on the horizontal force (p<0.01). Horizontal force was increased with increasing of forward speeds. The same result was reported by Wheeler and Godwin, 1996 and Astafford, 1979. The lowest horizontal force (average 1.66 kN) occurred at 1 m.s-1 and the highest (average 1.94 kN) occurred at 2 m.s-1 forward speeds. Horizontal force increased in O2 (2.8%) and decreased in O1 (3.4%) compared with the control (average 1.77 kN). Moreover, openers had significant influence on the vertical force (p<0.01). Vertical force values were negative in O1 (average -0.05 kN) and O2 (average -0.07 kN) in comparison with positive value in the control (average +0.01 kN). The effect of forward speed on vertical force was not statistically significant. The field results showed that there were significant differences among the openers in the numbers of seedling, grain and biological yield (p<0.01). The O2 opener (with the average of 48 seedlings per one meter row) had 33% and 24% more seedlings in comparison with O1 and check furrow openers, respectively. Probably, using dick bald in O2 design leads to increased seed germination. Increasing of seed germination by using disk furrow opener as an advantage is reported by Kushwaha and Foster, 1993. The O2 furrow opener would also increase grain yield about 36% compared with both O1 and check furrow openers.
Conclusions
It can be concluded that the newly designed furrow opener (O2) could improve the energy efficiency with increasing crop yield. Hence, O2 furrow opener could be recommended for direct planting in rain-fed farming.

Keywords

• Direct planting
• Dryland farming
• Energy Efficiency
• Farrow opener
• wheat

20.1001.1.22286829.1395.6.2.20.0

References

1. Altikat, S., A. Celik, and Z. Gozubuyuk. 2013. Effects of various no-till seeder and stubble condition on sowing performance and seed emergence of common Vetch. Soil and Tillage Research 126: 72-77.

2. Asoodar, M. A. 2004. New sowing point design for early root growth. Agroenviron-Udin Italy 20-24.

3. Bahri, A., and R. K. Bansal. 1993. Evaluation of different combination of furrow openers and press wheels for no till seeding. Agricultural Engineering Abstracts 18: 226.

4. Choudhary, M. A., Y. G. Pei, and C. J. Baker. 1985. Seed placement effects on seedling establishment in direct drilled fields. Soil and Tillage Research 6: 79-83.

5. Choudhary, M. A. 1988. A new multi crop inverted T seeder for upland crop establishment. AMA 19: 37-42.

6. Damora, D. P., and K. P. Pandey. 1995. Evaluation of performance of furrow openers of combined seed and fertilizer drills. Soil and Tillage Research 34: 127-139.

7. Freebairn, D. M., L. D. Ward, A. L. Clarke, and G. D. Smith. 1986. Research and development of reduced tillage systems for vertisoils in Queensland. Australia. Soil and Tillage Research 8: 211-229.

8. Gebresenbet, G., and H. Jonsson. 1992. Performance of seed drill coulters in relation to speed, depth and rake angles. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 52: 121-145.

9. Godwin, R. J. 2007. A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement force. Soil and Tillage Research 97: 331-340.

10. Habibi asl, J., N. Lovaymi, and S. M. J. Afzali. 2011. Optimization of cereal planter for Khoozestan dryland condition. Research report. Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. 90/217. )In Farsi(.

11. Koocheki, A., and M. Hosseini. 1994. Energy efficiency in agricultural ecosystems. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. )In Farsi).

12. Kumar, V., Y. S. Saharawat, M. K. Gathala, A. Sing jat, N. Chaudhary, and M. L. Jat. 2013. Effect of different tillage and seeding methods on energy use efficiency and productivity of wheat in the Indo-Gangetic plain. Field Crop Research 142: 1-8.

13. Kushwaha, R. L., and R. K. Foster. 1993. Field evaluation of grain drill furrow openers under conservation and conventional tillage system. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 35: 253-260.

14. Loghavi, M., and H. Azizi Aliabadi. 2008. The effect of aspect ratio (D/W) of narrow tools on draft, soil disturbed area and soil loosening efficiency. Journal of Soil and Water 22: 36-47.)In Farsi(.

15. Marakoglu, T., and K. Carma. 2009. Effects of design parameters of a cultivator share on draft and soil loosening in soil Bin. Journal of Agronomy 8: 21-26.

16. Seidi, E., Sh. Abdollahpour, A. Javadi, and A. Moghaddam. 2011. Soil movement in the seed slot created a new No-tillage furrow opener. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 21: 34-40. (In Farsi).

17. Solhjou, A., J. M. A. Desbiolles, and J. M. Fielke. 2013. Soil translocation by narrow openers with various blade face geometries. Biosystems Engineering 114: 259-266.

18. Stafford, J. V. 1979. The performance of a rigid tine in relation to soil properties and speed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 24: 41-56.

19. Tabatabaeefar, A., H. Emamzadeh, M. Gasemi, R. Rahimzadeh, and M. Karimi. 2009. Comparison of energy of tillage systems in wheat production. Energy 34: 41-45.

20. Taki. O., and A. Asadi. 2008. Development and evaluation direct cereal seed drill in No-tillage system Equipped with active opener. 5th agricultural machinery and mechanization engineering national conference. Mashhad, Mashhad Ferdosi University. )In Farsi(.

21. Tessier, S., K. E. Saxton, R. I. Papendick, and G. M. Hyde. 1991. Zero tillage furrow opener effects on seed environment and wheat emergence. Soil and Tillage Research 21: 347-360.

22. Wheeler, P. N., and R. J. Godwin. 1996. Soil dynamics of single and multiple tines at speed up to 20 km/h. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 63: 243-249.

23. Wilkins, D. E., G. A. Muilenburg, R. R. Allmaras, and C. E. Johnson. 1983. Grain drill opener effects on wheat emergence. Transactions of the ASAE 26: 651-655.