Modeling and Optimizing of the Energy Consumption of Moldboard Plow using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• M. Mehrijani
• J. Khodaei
• S. Zareei

Biosystems Engineering Department, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.v9i1.65908

Abstract

Introduction
Tillage as a preliminary step for agricultural production consumes large amounts of energy. Regarding the energy crisis and the greenhouse gas emissions caused by the indiscriminate use of fossil fuels, many efforts have been done to reduce energy consumption as much as possible. About half of the energy used in the crop production has been dedicated to tillage operations; hence the optimization of tillage tools performance can lead to decrease the energy loss. Tillage operation in most regions of Iran is carried out by moldboard plow. The ability of this plow in turning the soil has made it impressively different from the other plows. The energy used in tillage operations depends on various factors such as soil type and its conditions (soil moisture and texture), plow depth and forward speed. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of forward speed, plow depth and soil moisture on fuel consumption and required tensile force during tillage operation with a moldboard plow which uses three plows in clay soil.
Materials and Methods
The current study was carried out to optimize the tillage operation with a moldboard plow in the clay soil. Tillage experiments were performed to evaluate the effect of forward speed, plow depth and soil moisture content on the required tensile force and tractor fuel consumption. A moldboard plow with three single-sided plows was used to conduct experiments. Two tractors (MF285 and U650) and a dynamometer were used to measure the required tensile force. To measure the fuel consumption of the tractor during operation, the fuel level was measured in a separate tank system installed on the tractor's fuel system.
Experiments were carried out using response surface method and central composite design (CCD) by taking three levels of forward speed (4, 5 and 6 kmh^-1), three plow depth (20, 25 and 30 cm) and three levels of soil moisture content (12, 16 and 20%). Design Expert 8.0.6 software was used to analyze the experimental data.
Results and Discussion
The result of the analysis of variance showed that the effects of plow depth, forward speed and soil moisture, as well as the interaction between forward speed and moisture content on the fuel consumption during tillage operations with moldboard plow are significant. The results also indicated that the increase in forward speed decreased the fuel consumption. Also, fuel consumption decreased with increasing in moisture content at first, but then increased. The reason for this was probably because of the increased strength of soil particles due to the reduced moisture content (the stronger coherence force between the particles), which required more energy to shear the soil.
According to the results of analysis of variance, it can be concluded that all three factors of forward speed, plow depth and soil moisture had a significant effect on the required tensile force of moldboard plow at %1 probability level. With increasing the plow depth and forward speed, required tensile force increased significantly. The dependent variables were modeled as second order regression equations and optimal values of independent variables were determined. Optimum performance with maximum desirability was determined at forward speed of 5.08 kmh^-1, plow depth of 20 cm and soil moisture content of 16.41%.
Conclusion
With increasing plow depth, tensile force and fuel consumption increased. Also, tensile force increased with increasing forward speed, but this increase was not severely affected by the plow depth and reduced the fuel consumption. The quadratic regression models can well predict the required tensile force and fuel consumption. Using response surface method, optimum performance was determined at forward speed of 5.08 kmh^-1, plow depth of 20 cm and soil moisture content of 16.41%.

Keywords

• Fuel consumption
• MF285tractor
• Optimization
• Regression model
• Tensile force

20.1001.1.22286829.1398.9.1.13.2

Main Subjects

• Modeling

References

1. Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., and R. Sedghi. 2013. Prediction of tensile strength and energy requirement for sub-soiling operation using fuzzy logic method. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 3 (2): 104-113. (In Farsi).

2. Abbouda, S. K., A. H. Alhashem, and O. M. Saeed. 2001. The Effect of some operating parameters on field performance of a 2WD tractor. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences) 16: 94-103.

3. Al-Suhaibani, S. A., and A. E. Ghaly. 2010. Effect of plowing depth of tillage and forward speed on the performance of a medium size chisel plow operating in a sandy soil. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 (3): 247-255.

4. Bukhari, S., J. M. Baloch, G. R. Mari, A. N. Mirani, A. B. Bhuttoand, and M. A. Bhutto. 1990. Effect of different speeds on the performance of moldboard plow. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 22 (3): 79-82.

5. Darabi, S., M. Behroozi-Lar, E. Ebrahimiand, and B. Karami. 2012. Extraction of fuel consumption changes at the farm level to optimize energy consumption primary plowing in agricultural production. 7th National Congress of Agricultural machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi).

6. Earl, R. 1997. Assessment of the behavior of field soils during compression. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research 68: 147-157.

7. Fazeli, M., Y. Abbasspour-Guilandeh, G. Shahgholiand, and M. Noushyar. 2012. Comparison of tensile strength and energy of conventional cultivators. 7th National Congress of Agricultural machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi).

8. Giri, S. K. and S. Prasad. 2007. Drying kinetics and rehydration characteristics of microwave-vacuum and convective hot-air dried mushrooms. Journal of Food Engineering 78 (2): 512-521.

9. Godwin, R. J. 2007.A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces. Soil and Tillage Research 97: 331-340.

10. Godwin, R. J., M. J. Dogherty, C. Saundersand, and A. T. Balafoutis. 2007. A force prediction model for mouldboard ploughs incorporating the effects of soil characteristic properties, plough geometric factors and ploughing speed. Biosystems Engineering 97: 117-129.

11. Harrison, H. P., and W. B. Reed. 1968. Analysis of draft, depth and speed of tillage equipment. Agricultural Engineering International 10 (1): 14-23.

12. Hauck, D., V. Hofmanand, and H. Kucera. 1984. Traction – horsepower demonstration. ASAE Paper No. 84-1061, St. Joseph, MI 49085, U.S.A. 10P.

13. Hemmat, A., and V. I. Adamchuk. 2008. Sensor systems for measuring soil compaction: Review and analysis. Computer and Electronic in Agriculture 63: 89-103.

14. Hosseinzdeh Samani, B., E. Fayyazi, B. Ghobadian, and S. Rostami. 2016. Studying and optimizing the biodiesel production from mastic oil aided by ultrasonic using response surface method. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 6 (2): 440-450. (In Farsi).

15. Janulevicius, A., A. Juostas, and G. Pupinis. 2013. Tractor’s engine performance and emission characteristics in the process of ploughing. Energy Conversion and Management 75 (1): 498-508.

16. Kamakar, S., S. R. Ashrafizadeh, and R. L. Kushwaha. 2009. Experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics modeling for narrow tillage tool draft. Journal of Terramechanics 46: 277-283.

17. Karparvarfard, S. H., and H. Rahmanian-Koushkaki. 2010. Development of fuel consumption equation: Test case for a tractor chisel-ploughing in a clay loam soil. Biosystems Engineering 130: 23-33.

18. Kepner, R. A., R. Bainer, and E. L. Barger. 1987. Principles of farm Machinery. The AVI publishing Co., Inc., Westport, Connecticut. 486 P.

19. Kheiralla, F. A. 2004. Modeling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating on Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. Soil and Tillage Research 78: 21-34.

20. Kushwaha, R. L., and Z. X. Zhang. 1998. Evaluation of factors and current approaches related to computerized design of tillage tools: A review. Journal of Terramechanics 35: 69-86

21. Loghavi, M., and A. Moradi. 1996. Draft and drawbar power requirement of moldboard plow in a clay loam soil. Iran Agricultural Research 15 (2): 203-214.

22. Matthes, R. K. W. F., I. W. Watson, K. Savelle and D. L. Sirois. 1988. Effect of load and speed on fuel consumption of a rubber-tired skidder. Transactions of ASABE 31 (1): 37-39.

23. Mckyes, E. 1985. Soil cutting and tillage. Amsterdam of Holland.368 P.

24. Moitzi, G., H. Weingartmann, and J. Boxberger, 2006. Effects of tillage systems and wheel slip on fuel consumption. Energy Efficiency and Agricultural Engineering. International Scientific Conference Pp. 16-23.

25. Montgomery, D. C. 2008. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 8th edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.725 P.

26. Rashidi, M., I. Najjarzadeh, B. Jaberinasab, S. M. Emadi, and M. Fayyazi. 2013. Effect of soil moisture content, tillage depth and operation speed and draft force of moldboard plow. Journal of Science Research 16 (2): 245-249.

27. Rezapour-Sarabi, M., T. Mesri- Gondoshmian, Y. Abbaspour-Guilandehand A. Ahmadi. 2015. Determining the fuel consumption of the tractor MF6290 in the conventional tillage and no-tillage systems. 9th National Congress of Agricultural machinery Engineering and Mechanization, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. (In Farsi).

28. Roozbeh, M., and A. Hemmat. 2003. Evaluation and investigation of energy consumption in different tillage methods in corn planting. Journal of Agricultural Science 33: 117-128. (In Farsi).

29. Saunders, M., P. Lewisand, and A. Thornhill. 2000. Research methods for business students. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

30. Sirhan, A., B. Snober, and A. Baltikhi. 2002. Management of primary tillage operation to reduce tractor fuel consumption. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America 33 (4): 9-11.

31. Zhao, X., G. Zhouand, and Q. Tian. 2009. Study on the shear strength of deep reconstituted soils. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 19: 405-408.