Development of an Electronic System for Determining Vertical Loads on the Rear Axle of Cereal Combine Harvesters in Motion

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• A. Rezaei
• H. Masoudi
• H. Zaki Dizaji
• M. E. Khorasani

Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2021.58832.0

Abstract

Introduction
The cereal combine harvester is one of the agricultural machines that works in difficult conditions and its parts are constantly under various static and dynamic loads. For the optimal design of vehicle parts, types and values of loads applied to them must be determined correctly. The purpose of this study was to design and fabricate an electronic system that could instantly measure and store the amount of vertical load exerted on the rear axle of grain combine harvester in various conditions to be used in the design and optimization of the axle.
Materials and Methods
Main components of the designed system included a steel coupling, a disc loadcell (H2F-C2-10t ZEMIC model), an electronic board for amplifying loadcell output voltage, a data logger (AdvanTech DAQ Navi model), a 12-volt battery, and a laptop. A special steel coupling was designed in CATIA software for connecting the loadcell to the axle. The loadcell was placed between the coupling plates and then the coupling was installed on the center point of the rear axle of a JD 955 combine harvester. A standard tensile-compression testing machine (Cantam STM-150) was used to calibrate the loadcell. The relationship between the input load and the loadcell output voltage was linear and had a high coefficient of determination (R² = 0.9991). In the static test, the vertical load exerted on the axle was recorded by the electronic system while the combine was stopped and the combine engine was in ON/OFF modes. In the dynamic test, the combine was driven in three positions including asphalt road, dirt road, and wheat field at three different forward speeds, and loads on the rear axle were recorded by the electronic system. Finally, the data obtained from the tests were analyzed as a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design with five replications in Excel and SPSS software.
Results and Discussion
The average static loads on the combine rear axle in ON and OFF modes were 14.908 and 14.905 kN, respectively. The results of the Student's t-test of paired samples to compare the values of axle vertical loads in two modes of static load measurement showed that there is no significant difference between the axle loads in ON and OFF mode of the engine at 1% probability level. The average vertical loads on the rear axle of the combine were equal to 15.20, 15.27, and 15.28 kN, while driving on asphalt roads at speeds of 10, 15, and 20 km h^-1 respectively. These values were equal to 17.57, 17.99, and 18.15 kN, while driving on the dirt road at speeds of 2, 4, and 6 km h^-1 respectively, and they were equal to 16.47, 18.01, and 17.78 kN when harvesting wheat in the field at speeds of 3, 4, and 5 km h^-1 respectively. The average load applied on the axle in the turning path was more than the load applied in the straight path, which indicates load transfer to the rear axle during turning. The effect of forward speed and path type on the amount of axle load was significant at a 1% probability level, but their interaction was not significant. Therefore, the critical conditions for applying load on the rear axle of combine harvester are occurred while combine turns with high forward speed, and the design of the axle should be based on these conditions. The maximum load on the axle was obtained equal to 50 kN on the dirt road, which was due to the combine movement on a steep uphill at the end of the path.
Conclusion
Evaluation of the system in different conditions showed that the performance and accuracy of the system are acceptable and the data of this system can be trusted and used to measure the vertical load on the rear axle of the combine. The current rear axle of the JD955 combine harvester looks relatively safe, but at some very rugged elevations, especially steep uphills, it suffers from a lot of stress that may cause damage. So, optimizing the axle such as increasing the thickness of the triangular piece in the middle of axis and using a stronger alloy for the middle areas of the axle are recommended.

Keywords

• Cereals combine harvester
• Coupling
• Electronic system
• Load cell
• Rear axle

20.1001.1.22286829.1401.12.2.12.4

Main Subjects

• Design and Construction

Open Access

©2021 The author(s). This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

1. Annonymous. 2018. Axle load weighing system. Golstein Weighing Systems, The Netherlands. Available at: http://www.aslast.nl. Accessed 30 October 2020.
2. 2019. Portable Truck Weighing Scales. Galoce Company, Shaanxi, China. Available at: https://www.galoce.com. Accessed 30 October 2020.
3. Blanksby, Ch., R. George, B. Peters, A. Ritzinger, and L. Bruzsa. 2009. Measuring dynamic wheel loads on tri and quad axle groups. Proceedings of the International Conference on Heavy Vehicles. Wiley Online Library, Editor(s): Bernard Jacob and Eugene O'Brien. pp. 223-236.
4. Fernando, E., G. Harrison, and S. Hilbrich. 2007. Truck instrumentation for dynamic load measurement. Report 0-4863-1, Project 0-4863. Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, USA.
5. Foster, J. D. G. 2003. Measurement of central or offset axle load by axle-mounted strain gauges. Strain 39: 21-26.
6. Germanchev, A., Ch. Blanksby, A. Ritzinger, S. Patrick, B. Peters, L. Bruzsa, and J. Perovic. 2008. Measuring the dynamic wheel loads of heavy vehicles. 23rd ARRB Conference- Research Partnering with Practitioners. Adelaide, Australia.
7. Hajiahmad, A., A. Jafari, A. Keyhani, H. Goli, and B. Nodust. 2014. Development of a mechanism for measuring forces and aligning moment acting on the steering wheels of a four-wheel vehicle. Journal of Agricultural Machinery 4 (2): 141-153. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/jam.v4i2.20641.
8. Jafari, A., M. Khanali, H. Mobli, and A. Rajabipour. 2006. Stress analysis of front axle of JD 955 combine harvester under static loading. Journal of Agriculture & Social Sciences 2 (3): 133-135.
9. Kargar Moghadam, V. 2017. Tozin education set. Part Sanat Company, Tehran, Iran. Available at: http://partsanat.co. (In Persian).
10. Khanali, M., A. Jafari, H. Mobli, and A. Rajabipour. 2010. Analysis and design optimization of a frontal combine harvester axle using finite element and experimental methods. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 8 (2): 359-364.
11. Kharazan, M. 2011. Motion Theory of Vehicle. Nema Publications. Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).
12. Sroka, R., P. Burnos, and J. Gajda. 2019. Vehicle’s axle load sensors in weigh-in-motion systems. PP 49-67 in S. Y. Yurish eds. Physical and Chemical Sensors: Design, Applications & Networks (Book Series: Advances in Sensors: Reviews, Vol. 7). International Frequency Sensor Association (IFSA) Publishing, Barcelona.
13. Tarighi, J., S. S. Mohtasebi, and R. Alimardani. 2011. Static and dynamic analysis of front axle housing of tractor using finite element methods. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering (AJAE) 2 (2): 45-49.
14. Van, N. N., T. Matsuo, T. Koumoto, and Sh. Inaba. 2009. Transducers for measuring dynamic axle load of farm tractor. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture, Saga University 94: 23-35.
15. Wang, H., Z. Tang, X. Liu, B. Zhang, Z. Fu, and Y. Li. 2018. Test and analysis of half axle load of crawler chassis of rice combine harvester. International Agricultural Engineering Journal 27 (4): 255-262.
16. Yaoming, L., Y. Xiaofei, X. Lizhang, P. Jing, and M. Zheng. 2013. Construction and performance experiment of load test system for half axle of combine harvester. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE) 29 (6): 35- (In Chinese with English abstract).