ارتباط عملکرد محصول انگور با شاخص‌های گیاهی سنجش از دور: ترکیبی تصاویر سنتینل راداری و اپتیکی و مدل‌های یادگیری ماشین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

حمیدرضا ملکی ¹

مهرانه خدامرادپور ²

حسنی محمدی منور ¹

¹ گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

² گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2025.91357.1325

چکیده

ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﮏ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ در ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ محسوب می‌شود، که نقش مهمی در شناسایی پوشش‌های گیاهی متفاوت دارد. انگور از ارزشمندترین محصولات باغبانی است که استان همدان حدود 7.3 درصد از وسعت تاکستان‌های کشور را در اختیار دارد. با این حال توزیع جغرافیایی از تاکستان‌ها در این استان وجود ندارد. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی رابطه عملکرد محصول انگور با شاخص‌های سنجش از دور پوشش گیاهی در تاکستان‌های استان همدان است. به همین منظور، دقت شناسایی تاکستان‌های استان همدان توسط الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشین شامل: ماشین بردار پشتیبان (SVM) و حداقل فاصله (MD) و جنگل تصادفی (RF) با شاخص‌های سنجش از دور پوشش گیاهی شامل: شاخص تفاضلی نرمال‌شده گیاهی (NDVI) و شاخص تفاضلی نرمال‌شده آب (NDWI) برآوردشده از تصاویر ترکیبی اپتیکی و رادارای سنتینل (Sentinel-1 و Sentinel-2) انجام شد. سپس براساس دقیق‌ترین نقشه شناسایی تاکستان‌ها، سری زمانی ماکزیمم شاخص‌های NDVI و NDWI سنجنده‌ی مودیس در تاکستان‌ها در سال‌های 2007 تا 2020 برآورد شد و همبستگی آن‌ها با عملکرد واقعی محصول انگور بررسی شد. مقایسه دقت طبقه‌بندی الگوریتم‌های متفاوت بیانگر برتری الگوریتم RF با شاخص NDWI با بالاترین دقت کلی (%95) و ضریب کاپا (0.95) بود. هم‌چنین تحلیل همبستگی بین شاخص‌های NDVI و NDWI سنجنده مودیس مستخرج از نقشه تاکستان‌ها با عملکرد واقعی انگور نشان از رابطه خطی قوی‌تری بین شاخصNDVI  نسبت به NDWI دارد. یافته‌های این پژوهش که بیانگر دقت بالای شاخص‌های سنجش از دور و الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشین در تاکستان‌ها است می‌تواند در پیش‌بینی عملکرد محصول انگور قبل از برداشت، بهبود کیفیت انگور و مدیریت بهینه‌ی آبیاری نقش مهمی داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

شاخص NDVI

شاخص NDWI

مدل حداقل فاصله

مدل جنگل تصادفی

مدل ماشین بردار پشتیبان

موضوعات

• کشاورزی دیجیتال، هوشمند و دقیق

---

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

مراجع

1. Alex, E. C., Ramesh, K. V., & Sridevi, H. (2017). Quantification and understanding the observed changes in land cover patterns in Bangalore. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 597-603.
2. Adam, E., Mutanga, O., & Odindi, J., & Abdel-Rahman, E. M. (2014). Land-use/cover classification in a heterogeneous coastal landscape using Rapid Eye imagery: Evaluating the performance of random forest and support vector machines classifiers. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35, 3440-3458. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2014.903435
3. Adugna, T., Xu, W., & Fan, J. (2022). Comparison of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine Classifiers for Regional Land Cover Mapping Using Coarse Resolution FY-3C Images. Remote Sensing, 14(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030574
4. Ahmad, F. (2012). Detection of change in vegetation cover using multi-spectral and multi-temporal information for district Sargodha, Pakistan. Sociedade & Natureza, 24(3), 557-571. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-45132012000300014
5. Arab, S. T., Noguchi, R., Matsushita, S., & Ahamed, T. (2021). Prediction of grape yields from time-series vegetation indices using satellite remote sensing and a machine-learning approach. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 22, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100485
6. Avalos, J. M. M., & Araujo, E. S. (2021). Optimization of Vineyard Water Management: Challenges Strategies, and Perspectives. Water, 13(6), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060746
7. Biau, G., & Scornet. E. (2016). A random forest guided tour. Test, 25(2), 197-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7
8. Borgogno-Mondino, E., & Lessio, A. (2018). A FFT-Based approach to explore periodicity of vines/soil properties in vineyard from time series of satellite-derived spectral indices. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium(pp. 9078-9081). https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2018.8519437
9. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45, 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
10. Brinkhoff, J., Vardanega, J., & Robson, A. J. (2019). Land Cover Classification of Nine Perennial Crops Using Sentinel-1 and -2 Data. Remote Sensing, 12(1), 1-26. https://org/10.3390/rs12010096
11. Bovolo, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2007). A split-based approach to unsupervised change detection in large-size multitemporal images: Application to tsunami-damage assessment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(6), 1658-1670. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2007.895835
12. Basheer, S., Wang, X., Farooque, A. A., Nawaz, R. A., Liu, K., Adekanmbi, T., & Liu, S. (2022). Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978
13. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
14. Filgueiras, R., Mantovani, E. C., Althoff, D., FernandesFilho, E. I., & Cunha, F. F. D. (2019). Crop NDVI monitoring based on sentinel 1. Remote Sensing, 11(12), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121441
15. Faizizadeh, B. & Haydari, H. (2008). Estimation of vineyards cultivated area of in using SPOT5 satellite image. Journal of Geography and Planning, 14(27), 47-60. (in Persian). Retrieved from https://sid.ir/paper/203804/en
16. Ghayour, L., Neshat, A., Paryani, S., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chen, W., Ansari, N. A., Geertsema, M., Amiri, M. P., Gholamnia, M., Dou, J., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Performance evaluation of sentinel-2 and landsat8 OLI data for land cover/use classification using a comparison between machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071349
17. Goa, B. (1996). NDWI-A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing Environment, 58(3), 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
18. Gogtay, N. J., & Thatte, U. M. (2017). Principles of correlation analysis. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 65(3), 78-81. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28462548/
19. Gu, Y., Brown, J. F., Verdin, J. P., & Wardlow, B. (2007). A five‐year analysis of MODIS NDVI and NDWI for grassland drought assessment over the central Great Plains of the United States. Geophysical Research Letters,34(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029127
20. Hartling, S., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Maimaitijiang, M., & Carron, J. (2019). Urban tree species classification using a WorldView-2/3 and LiDAR data fusion approach and deep learning. Sensors, 19(6), 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061284
21. Holben, B. N. (1986). Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 7(11), 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948945
22. Huang, J., Chen, D., & Cosh, M.H. (2009). Sub-pixel reflectance unmixing in estimating vegetation water content and dry biomass of corn and soybeans cropland using normalized difference water index (NDWI) from satellites. Intenational Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(80), 2075-2104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802549245
23. Immitzer, M., Vuolo, F., & Atzberger, C. (2016). First Experience with Sentinel-2 Data for Crop and Tree Species Classifications in Central Europe. Remote Sensing, 8(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030166
24. Junges, A. H., Fontana, D. C., Anzanello, R., & Bremm, C. (2017). Normalized difference vegetation index obtained by ground-based remote sensing to characterize vine cycle in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazi. Ciencia E Agrotecnologia, 41(5), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542017415049016
25. Karimi, N., Sheshangosht, S., & Eftekhari, M. (2022). Crop type detection using an object-based classification method and multi-temporal Landsat satellite images. Paddy Water Environment, 20(3), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-022-00901-x
26. Keria, H., Bensaci, E., Zoubiri, A., & Ben Si Said, Z. (2024). Long-term dynamics of remote sensing indicators to monitor the dynamism of ecosystems in arid and semi-arid areas: contributions to sustainable resource management. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 15(4), 1532-1550. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.409
27. Kumar, L., & Mutanga, O. (2018). Google Earth Engine Applications Since Inception: Usage, Trends, and Potential. Remote Sensing, 10(10), 1509. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101509
28. Lewis, H. G., & Brown, M. (2001). A generalized confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(16), 3223-3235. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160152558332
29. Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2002). Classification and Regression by RandomForest. R News, 2, 18-22. Retrieved from https://journal.r-project.org/articles/RN-2002-022/RN-2002-022.pdf
30. Lopez-Martinez, C., & Fabregas, X. (2002). Modeling and reduction of SAR interferometric phase noise in the wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(12), 2553-2566. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2002.806997
31. Lu, S., Xuan, J., Zhang, T., Bai, X., Tian, F., & Ortega-Farias, S. (2022). Effect of the shadow pixels on evapotranspiration inversion of vineyard: A high-resolution UAV-based and ground-based remote sensing measurements. Remote Sensing, 14(9), 2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092259
32. Mirzaei, M., Abbasi, M., Marofi, S., Solgi, E., & Karimi, R. (2018). Spectral discrimination of important orchard species using hyperspectral indices and artificial intelligence approaches, Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 9(2), 76-92. (in Persian). Retrieved from https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/girs/Article/902480
33. MohamadiManavar, H., & Zibazadeh, S. (2022). Distinguishing rain-fed and irrigated crops in Hamadan province using spectral indices of satellite images. Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 12(4), 529-542. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jam.2021.69074.1022
34. Nematollahi, H., Ashourloo, D., Alimohammadi, A., Khodabandehloo, & Radiom, S. (2018). Development and application of crop and field condition indices using time-series satellite images of Sentinel-2. Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & amp: GIS. 10(3), 105-122. (in Persian with English abstract). Retrieved from https://gisj.sbu.ac.ir/article_96575.html
35. Negri, R. G., Dutra, L. V., Sant'Anna, S. J. S., & Lu, D. (2016). Examining region-based methods for land cover classification using stochastic distances. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(8), 1902-1921. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1165883
36. Pal, S., Pandey, S. K., Sharma, S. K., & Nair, R. (2022). Land use and land cover classification of Jabalpur district using minimum distance classifier. The Pharma Innovation, 11(11), 1161-1163. Retrieved from https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue11S/PartO/S-11-11-148-831.pdf
37. Pal, M., & Mather, P. M. (2005). Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5), 1007-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331314083
38. Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 187, 253-318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1896.0007
39. Phiri, D., Simwanda, M., Salekin, S., Nyirenda, V. R., Murayama, Y., & Ranagalage, M. (2020). Sentinel-2 data for land cover/use mapping: A review. Remote sensing, 12(14), https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142291
40. Robinson, N. P., Allred, B. W., Jones, M. O., Moreno, A., Kimball, J. S., Naugle, D. E., Erickson. T. A., & Richardson, A. D. (2017). A Dynamic Landsat Derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Product for the Conterminous United States. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 64-77. https:/doi.org/10.3390/rs9080863
41. Sekertekin, A., & Zadbagher, E. (2021). Simulation of future land surface temperature distribution and evaluating surface urban heat island based on impervious surface area. Ecological Indicators, 122, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107230
42. Tomas, P., Samuel, O. F., Dongryeol, R. (2018). Automatic Coregistration Algorithm to Remove Canopy Shaded Pixels in UAV-Borne Thermal Images to Improve the Estimation of Crop Water Stress Index of a Drip-Irrigated Cabernet Sauvignon Vineyard. Sensors, 18, 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020397
43. Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
44. Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E. & Rostan, F. (2012). GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote sensing of Environment, 120, 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028
45. Vélez, S., Barajas, E., Blanco, P., Rubio, J. A., & Castrillo, D. (2021). Spatio-temporal analysis of satellite imagery (NDVI) to identify terroir and vineyard yeast differences according to appellation of origin (AOP) and biogeographic origin. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal,4(3), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.3390/j4030020
46. Vintrou, E., Desbrosse, A., Begue, A., Traore, S., Baron, C., & Lo seen, D. (2012). Crop area mapping in West Africa using landscape stratification of MODIS time series and comparison with existing global land products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 14(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.06.010
47. Wacker, A. G., & Landgrebe, D. A. (1972). Minimum Distance Classification in Remote Sensing. LARS Technical Reports. Paper 25, 1-20. Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/larstech/25/
48. Yu, H., & Kim, S. (2012). SVM Tutorial: Classification, Regression and Ranking. Handbook of Natural Computing, 1, 479-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92910-9_15
49. Zare Khormizi, H., Ghafarian Malamiri, H. R, & Mortaz, M. (2020). Evaluation of supervised classification capability of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A Satellite images in determining type and area of Pistachio Cultivars. Journal of Rs and Gis for natural Resources, 11(1), 84-103. (in Persian with English abstract). Retrieved from https://srb.sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/902735
50. Zhao, L., Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Du, X. (2019). Integrating the Continuous Wavelet Transform and a Convolutional Neural Network to Identify Vineyard Using Time Series Satellite Images. Remote Sensing, 11(22), 2641. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11222641
51. Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery.